Abstract
Two experiments investigated saccade latency to a peripheral target under various warning signal conditions. In Experiment I, the effects of warning stimulus onset, change, and two offset conditions were compared at warning intervals of 0, 100, 300, and 600 msec. Warning stimulus onset, change, and offset were all effective in reducing saccade latency as compared to a no-warning control condition, but warning stimulus offset resulted in shorter saccade latency than onset or change at all warning intervals. Experiment 2 compared onset and offset warning conditions at −300-, −250-, −200-, −150-, −100-, −50-, 0-, and 50-msec intervals. Responses following onset were slower than those following offset at the latter five intervals, while warning onset resulted in slower saccades than no-warning control conditions at −150-, −100-, and −50-msec intervals. These results indicate that the onset of a visual warning signal can have an interfering effect on the programming or execution of a saccade.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker, W. The control of eye movements in the saccadic system. In J. Dichgans & E. Bizzi (Eds.),Cerebral control of eye movements and motion perception. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1972.
Carpenter, R. H. S.Movements of the eyes. London: Peon, 1977.
Cohen, M. E., &Ross, L. E. Saccade latency in children and adults: Effects of warning interval and target eccentricity.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1977,23, 539–549.
Cohen, M. E., &Ross, L. E. Latency and accuracy characteristics of saccades and corrective saccades in children and adults.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1978,26, 517–527.
Fellows, B. J. Chance stimulus sequences for discrimination tasks.Psychological Bulletin, 1967,67, 87–92.
Hansteen, R. W. Visual latency as a function of stimulus onset, offset, and background luminance.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1971,61, 1190–1195.
Lewis, J. H., Dunlap, W. P., &Matteson, H. H. Perceptual latency as a function of stimulus onset and offset and retinal location.Vision Research,1972,12, 1725–1731.
Nickerson, R. S. Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: Energy summation or preparation enhancement?Psychological Review, 1973,80, 489–509.
Posner, M. I. Psychobiology of attention. In M. Gazzaniga & C. Blakemore (Eds.),Handbook of psychobiology. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
Potter, M. C. Short-term conceptual memory for pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Learning and Memory, 1976,2, 509–522.
Potter, M. C., &Levy, E. I. Recognition memory for a rapid sequence of pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,81, 10–15.
Sanders, A. F. Foreperiod duration and the time course of preparation.Acta Psychologica, 1972,36, 60–71.
Saslow, M. G. Effects of components of displacement-step stimuli upon latency for saccadic eye movement.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1967,57, 1024–1029.
Senders, J. W. Speculations and notions. In R. A. Monty & J. W. Senchas (Eds.),Eye movements and psychological processes. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1976.
Walsh, T. Visual onset and offset latencies.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,25, 154–162.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by USPHS Grant HD08240.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ross, L.E., Ross, S.M. Saccade latency and warning signals: Stimulus onset, offset, and change as warning events. Perception & Psychophysics 27, 251–257 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204262
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204262