Abstract
Orthographic transparency refers to the systematicity in the mapping between orthographic letter sequences and phonological phoneme sequences in both directions, for reading and spelling. Measures of transparency previously used in the analysis of orthographies of other languages include regularity, consistency, and entropy. However, previous reports have typically been hampered by severe restrictions, such as using only monosyllables or only word-initial phonemes. Greek is sufficiently transparent to allow complete sequential alignment between graphemes and phonemes, therefore permitting full analyses at both letter and grapheme levels, using every word in its entirety. Here, we report multiple alternative measures of transparency, using both type and token counts, and compare these with estimates for other languages. We discuss the problems stemming from restricted analysis sets and the implications for psycholinguistic experimentation and computational modeling of reading and spelling.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. Y., & Cortese, M. J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 285–375). London: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-012369374-7/50010-9
Borgwaldt, S. R., Hellwig, F. M., & De Groot, A. M. B. (2004). Word-initial entropy in five languages: Letter to sound and sound to letter. Written Language & Literacy, 7, 165–184. doi:10.1075/ wll.7.2.03bor
Borgwaldt, S. R., Hellwig, F. M., & De Groot, A. M. B. (2005). Onset entropy matters—Letter-to-phoneme mappings in seven languages. Reading & Writing, 18, 211–229. doi:10.1007/s11145-005-3001-9
Burani, C., Barca, L., & Ellis, A. W. (2006). Orthographic complexity and word naming in Italian: Some words are more transparent than others. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 346–352.
Burt, J. S., & Blackwell, P. (2008). Sound-spelling consistency in adults’ orthographic learning. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 77–96. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00362.x
Chalamandaris, A., Raptis, S., & Tsiakoulis, P. (2005, September). Rule-based grapheme-to-phoneme method for the Greek. In Inter-speech 2005: 9th European conference on speech communication and technology (pp. 2937–2940). Lisbon, Portugal.
Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. Inc G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151–216). London: Academic Press.
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589–608. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.589
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
Conrad, M., Carreiras, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2008). Contrasting effects of token and type syllable frequency in lexical decision. Language & Cognitive Processes, 23, 296–326. doi:10.1080/01690960701571570
Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167–188. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4
Goswami, U., Porpodas, C., & Wheelwright, S. (1997). Children’s orthographic representations in English and Greek. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 3, 273–292.
Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2008). Cross-code consistency in a functional architecture for word recognition. In E. L. Grigorenko & A. J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (pp. 129–158). New York: Erlbaum.
Hanna, P. R., Hanna, J. S., & Hodges, R. E. (1966). Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
Hatzigeorgiu, N., Gavrilidou, M., Piperidis, S., Carayannis, G., Papakostopoulou, A., Spiliotopoulou, A., et al. (2000). Design and implementation of the online ILSP corpus. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference of Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC) (Vol. 3, pp. 1737–1740). Athens.
Hofmann, M. J., Stenneken, P., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2007). Sublexical frequency measures for orthographic and phonological units in German. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 620–629.
Jared, D. (2002). Spelling-sound consistency and regularity effects in word naming. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 723–750. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2827
Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (2001). Relationships between sounds and letters in English monosyllables. Journal of Memory & Language, 44, 592–617. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2745
Kessler, B., Treiman, R., & Mullennix, J. (2008). Feedback-consistency effects in single-word reading. In E. L. Grigorenko & A. J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (pp. 159–174). New York: Erlbaum.
Lété, B., Peereman, R., & Fayol, M. (2008). Consistency and word-frequency effects on spelling among first- to fifth-grade French children: A regression-based study. Journal of Memory & Language, 58, 952–977. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.01.001
Marcus, G. F., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 189–256. doi:10.1006/cogp.1995.1015
McKague, M., Davis, C., Pratt, C., & Johnston, M. B. (2008). The role of feedback from phonology to orthography in orthographic learning: An extension of item-based accounts. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 55–76. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00361.x
Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Do type and token effects reflect different mechanisms? Connectionist modeling of Dutch past-tense formation and final devoicing. Brain & Language, 90, 287–298. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2003.12.002
Peereman, R., & Content, A. (n.d.). Quantitative analyses of orthography to phonology mapping in English and French. Retrieved September 22, 2008, from http://homepages.vub.ac.be/~acontent/OPMapping.html.
Perry, C., Ziegler, J., & Coltheart, M. (2002). How predictable is spelling? Developing and testing metrics of phoneme-grapheme contingency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 897–915. doi:10.1080/02724980143000640
Petrounias, E. V. (2002). Neoellinikí grammatikí kai sigkritikí análisi: Tómos A. Fonitikí kai eisagogí sti fonología [Modern Greek grammar and comparative analysis: Vol. A. Phonetics and introduction to phonology]. Thessaloniki: Ziti.
Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 73–193. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(88)90032-7
Porpodas, C. D. (1999). Patterns of phonological and memory processing in beginning readers and spellers of Greek. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 406–416. doi:10.1177/002221949903200506
Porpodas, C. D. (2006). Literacy acquisition in Greek: Research review of the role of phonological and cognitive factors. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 189–199). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Porpodas, C. D., Pantelis, S. N., & Hantziou, E. (1990). Phonological and lexical encoding processes in beginning readers: Effects of age and word characteristics. Reading & Writing, 2, 197–208. doi:10.1007/ BF00257971
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174. doi:10.1348/000712603321661859
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423 and 623–656.
Shannon, C. E. (1950). Prediction and entropy of printed English. Bell System Technical Journal, 30, 50–64.
Spencer, K. A. (2007). Predicting children’s word-spelling difficulty for common English words from measures of orthographic transparency, phonemic and graphemic length and word frequency. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 305–338. doi:10.1348/000712606X123002
Spencer, K. A. (2009). Feedforward, -backward, and neutral transparency measures for British English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 220–227. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.1.220
Spencer, K. A. (in press). Predicting children’s word-reading difficulty for common English words: The effect of complexity and transparency. British Journal of Psychology.
Stathis, C., & Carayannis, G. (1999). Emploutismós morfologikón lexikón me órous kai ipostíriksi kiménon entáseos óron se diadikasíes diórthosis lathón [Enriching morphological dictionaries with terms and supporting term-intensive texts in error correction procedures]. In Praktika 2ou sinedriou “Elliniki Glossa kai Orologia” (pp. 157-165). Athens.
Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107–136. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.107
Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2006). Simulating consistency effects and individual differences in nonword naming: A comparison of current models. Journal of Memory & Language, 54, 145–160. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.08.002
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3
Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M., & Stone, G. O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 504–515.
Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Coltheart, M. (2000). The DRC model of visual word recognition and reading aloud: An extension to German. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 413–430. doi:10.1080/09541440050114570
Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Coltheart, M. (2003). Speed of lexical and nonlexical processing in French: The case of the regularity effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 947–953.
Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 600–618.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The quantification of Greek orthographic transparency is part of a larger ongoing effort at the Institute for Language and Speech Processing (ILSP) to provide psycholinguistic resources for the Greek language. Data tables, code implementing graphophonemic conversion by rule, and other material may be downloaded from http://speech.ilsp.gr/iplr/.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Protopapas, A., Vlahou, E.L. A comparative quantitative analysis of Greek orthographic transparency. Behavior Research Methods 41, 991–1008 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.991
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.991