Abstract
ATC-labAdvanced is a new, publicly available air traffic control (ATC) simulation package that provides both realism and experimental control. ATC-labAdvanced simulations are realistic to the extent that the display features (including aircraft performance) and the manner in which participants interact with the system are similar to those used in an operational environment. Experimental control allows researchers to standardize air traffic scenarios, control levels of realism, and isolate specific ATC tasks. Importantly, ATC-labAdvanced also provides the programming control required to cost effectively adapt simulations to serve different research purposes without the need for technical support. In addition, ATC-labAdvanced includes a package for training participants and mathematical spreadsheets for designing air traffic events. Preliminary studies have demonstrated that ATC-labAdvanced is a flexible tool for applied and basic research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman, P. L. (1992). Predicting individual differences in complex skill acquisition: Dynamics of ability determinants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 598–614.
Athenes, S., Averty, P., Puechmorel, S., Delahaye, D., & Collet, C. (2002). Complexity and controller workload: Trying to bridge the gap. In Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics (HCI-Aero 2002) (pp. 56–60). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Berkowitz, L., & Donnerstein, E. (1982). External validity is more than skin deep: Some answers to criticisms of laboratory experiments. American Psychologist, 37, 245–257.
Bliese, P. D., & Ployhart, R. E. (2002). Growth modeling using random coefficient models: Model building, testing, and illustration. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 362–387.
Bolland, S., Fothergill, S., & Humphreys, M. (2007). Modelling the human operator: Part II. Emulating controller intervention. In R. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 57–62). Dayton, OH: Association for Aviation Psychology.
Boring, E. G. (1954). The nature and history of experimental control. American Journal of Psychology, 67, 573–589.
Brehmer, B., & Dorner, D. (1993). Experiments with computer-simulated microworlds: Escaping both the narrow straights of the laboratory and the deep blue sea of the field study. Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 171–184.
Brunswick, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Callantine, T. J. (2002). CATS-based air traffic controller agents (NASA Technical Memorandum 211856). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
Cox, M. (1994). Task analysis of selected operating positions within UK air traffic control (Rep. No. 749). Farnborough, U.K.: DRA/Institute of Aviation Medicine.
DiFonzo, N., Hantula, D. A., & Bordia, P. (1998). Microworlds for experimental research: Having your (control and collection) cake, and realism too. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 278–286.
Dismukes, R. K. (2008). Prospective memory in aviation and everyday settings. In M. Kliegel, M. A. McDaniel, & G. O. Einstein (Eds.), Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 411–428). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ehret, B. D., Gray, W. D., & Kirschenbaum, S. S. (2000). Contending with complexity: Developing and using a scaled world in applied cognitive research. Human Factors, 42, 8–23.
Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 717–726.
Ericsson, K. A., & Williams, A. M. (2007). Capturing naturally occurring superior performance in the laboratory: Translational research on expert performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 115–123.
Fothergill, S., & Neal, A. (2005). Managing the airspace: A task analysis of Australian air traffic control. Australian Journal of Psychology Supplement, 57, 109–110.
Fothergill, S., & Neal, A. (2006). Decision making in air traffic control: How contextual factors influence conflict resolution choices. Australian Journal of Psychology Supplement, 59, 3.
Fothergill, S., & Neal, A. (2008). An evaluation of the effect of workload on conflict decision making in air traffic control. Australian Journal of Psychology Supplement, 60, 4.
Gray, W. D. (2002). Simulated task environments: The role of highfidelity simulations, scaled worlds, synthetic environments, and microworlds in basic and applied cognitive research. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 2, 205–227.
Gronlund, S. D., Ohrt, D. D., Dougherty, M. R. P., Perry, J. L., & Manning, C. A. (1998). Role of memory in air traffic control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 263–280.
Hendy, K. C., Liao, J., & Milgram, P. (1997). Combining time and intensity effects in assessing operator information processing load. Human Factors, 39, 30–47.
Jeppesen (2007). TAAM solutions. Retrieved April 8, 2008, from www.preston.net/products/TAAM.htm. Jones, D. G., & Endsley, M. R. (2000). Overcoming representational errors in complex environments. Human Factors, 42, 367-378.
Kopardekar, P., & Magyarits, S. (2003, June). Measurement and prediction of dynamic density. Paper presented at the 5th USA/Europe ATM Research and Development Seminar, Budapest.
Kwantes, P. J., Neal, A., & Loft, S. (2004). Developing a formal model of human memory in a simulated air traffic control conflict detection task. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting (pp. 391–395). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors & Ergonomics Society.
Lamoureux, T. (1999). The influence of aircraft proximity data on the subjective mental workload of controllers in the air traffic control task. Ergonomics, 42, 1482–1491.
Laudeman, I., Shelden, S., Branstrom, R., & Brasil, C. (1998). Dynamic density: An air traffic management metric (NASA-TM-1988-11226). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
Loft, S., Bolland, S., & Humphreys, M. (2007). Modelling the human air traffic controller. Expert-trainee differences in conflict detection. In R. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 409–414). Dayton, OH: Association for Aviation Psychology.
Loft, S., Campbell, L. & Remington, R. W. (2008, March). Failure to deviate from routine and task interference in an air traffic control task. Paper presented at the 34th Australasian Experimental Psychology Conference, Perth, Australia.
Loft, S., Hill, A., Neal, A., Humphreys, M., & Yeo, G. (2004). ATClab: An air traffic control simulator for the laboratory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 331–338.
Loft, S., Humphreys, M., & Neal, A. (2004). The influence of memory for prior instances on performance in a conflict detection task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 173–187.
Loft, S., Neal, A., & Humphreys, M. (2007). The development of a general associative learning account of skill acquisition in a conflict detection task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 938–959.
Loft, S., Sanderson, P., Neal, A., & Mooij, M. (2007). Modeling and predicting mental workload in en route air traffic control: Critical review and broader implications. Human Factors, 49, 376–399.
Metzger, U., & Parasuraman, R. (2001). The role of the air traffic controller in future air traffic management: An empirical study of active control versus passive monitoring. Human Factors, 43, 519–528.
Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external validity. American Psychologist, 38, 379–387.
Rantanen, E. M., & Nunes, A. (2005). Hierarchical conflict detection in air traffic control. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 15, 339–362.
Raytheon (2005). FIRSTplus tower and radar simulator. Retrieved April 8, 2008, from www.ray.ca/external/home.nsf /(Webpages)/Products_FIRSTplus? OpenDocument.
Remington, R. W., Johnston, J. C., Ruthruff, E., Gold, M., & Romera, M. (2000). Visual search in complex displays: Factors affecting conflict detection by air traffic controllers. Human Factors, 42, 349–366.
Rodgers, M. D., & Drechsler, G. K. (1993). Conversion of the CTA Inc, En Route operations concepts database into a formal sentence outline job task taxonomy (FAA Rep. DOT/FAA/AM-93/1). Washington, DC: FAA Office of Aviation Medicine.
Schiff, W., Arnone, W., & Cross, S. (1994). Driving assessment with computer-video scenarios: More is sometimes better. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 26, 192–194.
Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of environments. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138.
Späth, O., & Eyferth, K. (2001). Conflict resolution in en route traffic: A draft concept for an assistance system compatible with solutions of air traffic controllers. MMI-Interaktiv, 5, 1–11.
Stone, M., Dismukes, K., & Remington, R. (2001). Prospective memory in dynamic environments: Effects of load, delay, and phonological rehearsal. Memory, 9, 165–176.
UFA Inc. (n.d.). The experts in air traffic control simulation: Products. Retrieved on April 8, 2008, from www.atcoach.com/products1.html.
Yeo, G., & Neal, A. (2004). A multilevel analysis of effort, practice and performance: Effects of ability, conscientiousness and goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 231–247.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by Linkage Grant LP0453978 from the Australian Research Council.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fothergill, S., Loft, S. & Neal, A. ATC-labAdvanced: An air traffic control simulator with realism and control. Behavior Research Methods 41, 118–127 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.1.118
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.1.118