Abstract
A number of properties of word associations, generated in a continuous task, were investigated. First, we investigated the correspondence of word class in association cues and responses. Nouns were the modal word class response, regardless of the word class of the cue, indicating a dominant paradigmatic response style. Next, the word association data were used to build an associative network to investigate the centrality of nodes. The study of node centrality showed that central nodes in the network tended to be highly frequent and acquired early. Small-world properties of the association network were investigated and compared with a large English association network (Steyvers & Tenenbaum, 2005). Networks based on a multiple association procedure showed small-world properties despite being denser than networks based on a discrete task. Finally, a semantic taxonomy was used to investigate the composition of semantic types in association responses. The majority of responses were thematically related situation responses and entity responses referring to parts, shape, or color. Since the association task required multiple responses per cue, the interaction between generation position and semantic role could be investigated and discussed in the framework of recent theories of natural concept representations (Barsalou, Santos, Simmons, & Wilson, in press).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdullaev, Y. G., & Posner, M. I. (1997). Time course of activating brain areas in generating verbal associations. Psychological Science, 8, 56–59.
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (1999). Internet: Diameter of the World-Wide Web. Nature, 401, 130–131.
Allport, D. A. (1985). Distributed memory, modular subsystems and dysphasia. In S. Newman & R. Epstein (Eds.), Current perspectives in dysphasia (pp. 32–60). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
Amaral, L. A., Scala, A., Barthelemy, M., & Stanley, H. E. (2000). Classes of small-world networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 11149–11152.
Baayen, R., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509–512.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.
Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W., & Wilson, C. D. (in press). Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In M. De Vega, A. M. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols, embodiment, and meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bell, B. D., Davies, K. G., Hermann, B. P., & Walters, G. (2000). Confrontation naming after anterior temporal lobectomy is related to age of acquisition of the object names. Neuropsychologia, 38, 83–92.
Brysbaert, M., Van Wijnendaele, I., & De Deyne, S. (2000). Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. Acta Psychologica, 104, 215–226.
Buchanan, L., Westbury, C., & Burgess, C. (2001). Characterizing the neighborhood: Semantic neighborhood effects in lexical decision and naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 531–544.
Burgess, C., & Lund, K. (1997). Modelling parsing constraints with high-dimensional context space. Language & Cognitive Processes, 12, 177–210.
Cramer, P. (1965). Response entropy as a function of the affective quality of the stimulus. Psychonomic Science, 3, 347–348.
Cramer, P. (1968). Word association. New York: Academic Press.
Cree, G. S., & McRae, K. (2003). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 163–201.
De Deyne, S., & Storms, G. (2007). Age-of-acquisition differences in young and older adults affect latencies in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Acta Psychologica, 124, 274–295.
De Deyne, S., & Storms, G. (2008). Word associations: Norms for 1,424 Dutch words in a continuous task. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 198–205.
Deese, J. (1962). Form class and the determinants of association. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1, 79–84.
Deese, J. (1965). The structure of associations in language and thought. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
de Groot, A. M. B. (1980). Mondelinge woordassociatienormen: 100 woordassociaties op 460 Nederlandse zelfstandige naamwoorden [Oral word association norms: 100 word associations to 460 Dutch nouns]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
de Groot, A. M. B. (1989). Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency as assessed through word association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory. & Cognition, 15, 824–845.
Freeman, L. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on between-ness. Sociometry, 40, 35–41.
Galbraith, R., & Underwood, B. (1973). Perceived frequency of concrete and abstract words. Memory & Cognition, 1, 56–60.
Ghyselinck, M., Custers, R., & Brysbaert, M. (2003). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 2322 Dutch words from 49 different semantic categories. Psychologica Belgica, 43, 181–214.
Ghyselinck, M., De Moor, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2000). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 2816 Dutch four- and five-letter nouns. Psychologica Belgica, 40, 77–98.
Glanzer, M. (1962). Grammatical category: A rote learning and word association analysis. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1, 31–41.
Glenberg, A. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 20, 1–55.
Griffiths, T. L., Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Topics in semantic representation. Psychological Review, 114, 211–244.
Hampton, J. (1997). Associative and similarity-based processes in categorization decisions. Memory & Cognition, 25, 625–640.
Jeong, H., Tombor, B., Albert, R., Oltvai, Z. N., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000). The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature, 407, 651–654.
Joordens, S., & Becker, S. (1997). The long and short of semantic priming effects in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory. & Cognition, 23, 1083–1105.
Kay, J., & Hanley, J. R. (1999). Person-specific knowledge and knowledge of biological categories. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 171–180.
Lambert, W. (1955). Associational fluency as a function of stimulus abstractness. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 9, 103–106.
Landauer, T., & Dumais, S. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.
Liljeros, F., Edling, C. R., Amaral, L. A. N., Stanley, H. E., & Åberg, Y. (2001). The web of human sexual contacts. Nature, 411, 907–908.
Livesay, K., & Burgess, C. (1999). The influence of verbal ability on mediated priming. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 314–319). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Locker, L., Jr., Simpson, G. B., & Yates, M. (2003). Semantic neighborhood effects on the recognition of ambiguous words. Memory & Cognition, 31, 505–515.
Lupker, S. (1984). Semantic priming without association: A second look. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 709–733.
Marschark, M., & Hunt, R. R. (1989). A reexamination of the role of imagery in learning and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 710–720.
McRae, K., & Cree, G. S. (2002). Factors underlying category-specific semantic deficits. In E. M. E. Forde & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Category-specificity in brain and mind (pp. 211–249). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Nelson, D. L., & McEvoy, C. L. (2000). What is this thing called frequency? Memory & Cognition, 28, 509–522.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (2004). The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 402–407.
Nelson, D. L., Zhang, N., & McKinney, V. (2001). The ties that bind what is known to the recognition of what is new. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1147–1159.
Newman, M. E. J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45, 167.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Postman, L. (1964). The acquisition and retention of consistent associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 183–190.
Redner, S. (1998). How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. European Physical Journal, 4B, 131–134.
Ruts, W., De Deyne, S., Ameel, E., Vanpaemel, W., Verbeemen, T., & Storms, G. (2004). Dutch norm data for 13 semantic categories and 338 exemplars. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 506–515.
Schwanenflugel, P., & Shoben, E. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9, 82–102.
Shelton, J. R., & Martin, R. C. (1992). How semantic is automatic semantic priming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 1191–1210.
Simmons, W., Hamann, S., Harenski, C., Hu, X., & Barsalou, L. (2007). fMRI evidence for word association and situated simulation in conceptual processing. Manuscript in preparation.
Sporns, O., Chialvo, D. R., Kaiser, M., & Hilgetag, C. C. (2004). Organization, development and function of complex brain networks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 418–425.
Steyvers, M., Shiffrin, R. M., & Nelson, D. L. (2004). Word association spaces for predicting semantic similarity effects in episodic memory. In A. F. Healy (Ed.), Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications (pp. 237–249). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. (2005). The large-scale structure of semantic networks: Statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth. Cognitive Science, 29, 41–78.
Strogatz, S. H. (2001). Exploring complex networks. Nature, 410, 268–276.
Ukita, H., Abe, K., & Yamada, J. (1999). Late acquired words in childhood are lost earlier in primary progressive aphasia. Brain & Language, 70, 205–219.
van Loon-Vervoorn, W. (1985). Voorstelbaarheidswaarden van Nederlandse woorden: 4600 substantieven, 1000 verba, 500 adjectieven [Imageability ratings of Dutch words: 4600 nouns, 1000 verbs, 500 adjectives]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
van Loon-Vervoorn, W. (1989). Eigenschappen van basiswoorden [Properties of basic words]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Lewis, W., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 422–488.
Wattenmaker, W., & Shoben, E. (1987). Context and the recallability of concrete and abstract sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 140–150.
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature, 393, 440–442.
Wu, L., & Barsalou, L. (2007). Grounding concepts in perceptual simulation: I. Evidence from property generation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by Grant OT/01/15 from the Leuven University Council and Grant G.02666.02 from the Belgian National Science Foundation, awarded to the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Deyne, S., Storms, G. Word associations: Network and semantic properties. Behav Res 40, 213–231 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.1.213
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.1.213