Abstract
In signal detection theory, sensitivity can be indexed as either the distance between distributions or the area under the isosensitivity curve. The statistic d′ is usually identified as a distance measure of sensitivity, while A′ is an estimate of the area. This article considers both statistics as estimates. As such, they can be evaluated against actual distances and areas calculated under specific assumptions about the variances of the distributions. The analysis shows that d′ is a better estimate of distance than A′ is of area only under the assumption that the variances of the hypothetical distributions are equal (i.e., the slope of the z-coordinate ROC is 1.0). When the slope takes on values other than 1.0, A′ is generally a more accurate estimate of area than d′ is of distance.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Donaldson, W. (1992). Measuring recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 275–277.
Green, D. M., & Moses, F. L. (1966). On the equivalence of two recognition measures of short-term memory. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 228–234.
Grier, J. B. (1971). Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: Computing formulas. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 424–429.
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50.
Swets, J. A., & Pickett, R. M. (1982). Evaluation of diagnostic systems: Methods from signal detection theory. New York: Academic Press.
Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., Murphy, A. Z., & Dittmar, M. L. (1992). Sensing and decision-making components of the signal-regularity effect in vigilance performance. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 297–300.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was completed while the author was on sabbatical leave at the University of California at Santa Cruz and was supported by a research grant from the University of New Brunswick.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Donaldson, W. Accuracy of d′ and A′ as estimates of sensitivity. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 31, 271–274 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334926
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334926