Abstract
Hick’s law states that choice reaction time is a linear function of the amount of information provided by the reaction stimulus. Thus a straight line is predicted for the function that relates choice reaction time to the logarithm of the number of response alternatives. Although some (but not all) studies have confirmed this relationship, the range of response alternatives has been almost completely limited to 2 to 8 choices. Three experiments now extend the range to 16 choices and beyond. In all of them, a curvilinear function is obtained. Longstreth’s power law better fits the data (Longstreth, El-Zahhar, & Alcorn, 1985). It is concluded that Hick’s law is an approximation to the complete power function and that it becomes noticeably deficient only beyond 3 bits of stimulus uncertainty (i.e., 8 choices).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fitts, P. M., & Switzer, G. (1962). Cognitive aspects of information processing: I. The familiarity of S-R sets and subsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 321–329.
Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11–26.
Hilgendorf, L. (1966). Information input and response time. Ergonomics, 9, 31–37.
Jensen, A. R. (1983). Methodological and statistical techniques for the chronometric study of mental abilities. In C. Reynolds & V. Willson (Eds.), Methodological and statistical advances in the study of individual differences (pp. 51-116). New York: Plenum.
Longstreth, L. E., & Alcorn, M. B. (1987). Hick’s law versus a power law: Reply to Welford. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 315–316.
Longstreth, L. E., El-Zahhar, N., & Alcorn, M. B. (1985). Exceptions to Hick’s law: Explorations with a response duration measure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 417–434.
Seibel, R. (1962). Discrimination reaction time as a function of the number of stimulus-response pairs and the self-pacing adjustment of the subject. Psychological Monographs, 76(Whole No. 561).
Seibel, R. (1963). Discrimination reaction time for a 1,023-alternative task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 215–226.
Welford, A. T. (1980). The single-channel hypothesis. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction times. New York: Academic Press.
Welford, A. T. (1987). Comment on “Exceptions to Hick’s law: Explorations with a response duration measure” (Longstreth, El-Zahhar, & Alcorn, 1985). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 312–314.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author thanks Jia Pan for assistance in running subjects.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Longstreth, L.E. Hick’s law: Its limit is 3 bits. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 26, 8–10 (1988). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334845
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334845