Abstract
Positive, neutral, and negative expectancy conditions were varied to determine their effects on time perception. Subjects were led to believe that their participation would result in a “pleasant,” an “unpleasant,” or a subjectively neutral experience. Intervals of 60 and 240 sec were estimated under each expectancy condition. The results indicated that the positive expectancy group tended to overestimate the actual interval (time passed relatively slowly), whereas the neutral and negative expectancy groups tended to underestimate the actual interval. The results are related to theories of time perception.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cahoon, D., & Edmonds, E. M. The watched pot still won’t boil: Expectancy as a variable in estimating the passage of time. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1980, 16, 115–116.
Filer, R., & Meals, D. The effect of motivating conditions on the estimation of time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1949, 39, 327–331.
Fraisse, p. The psychology of time. New York: Harper & Row, 1963.
Ornstein, R. E. On the experience of time. London: Penguin, 1969.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Edmonds, E.M., Cahoon, D. & Bridges, B. The estimation of time as a function of positive, neutral, or negative expectancies. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 17, 259–260 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333733
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333733