Abstract
When human subjects are presented a light and a tone simultaneously, each of which serves as a cue in a reaction time task, responding is predominantly to the light. This phenomenon has been referred to as visual dominance. The present experiment attempted to test the hypothesis that when subjects must divide their attention between different objects in space, the visual channel is favored over the auditory channel. Rather than the “free-field” method used in our earlier work, our procedure involved the use of earphones to deliver the auditory stimulus. The results provided a further indication of the robustness of the visual dominance effect. While there was a slight reduction in the magnitude of the effect, as compared with the “free-field” situation, responding was still predominantly to the visual stimulus.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Colavita, F. B. Human sensory dominance. Perception & Psychophysics, 1974, 16, 409–412.
Colavita, F. B., Tomko, R., & Weisberg, D. Visual prepotency and eye orientation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1976, 8, 581–582.
Colavita, F. B., & Weisberg, D. A further investigation of visual dominance. Perception & Psychophysics, 1979, 25, 345–347.
Egeth, H. E., & Sager, L. C. On the locus of visual dominance. Perception & Psychophysics, 1977, 22, 77–86.
Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Klein, R. M. Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 1976, 83, 157–171.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Colavita, F.B. Visual dominance and attention in space. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 19, 261–262 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330251
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330251