Abstract
Visually evoked potentials elicited by tachistoscopically displayed alphabetic stimuli were recorded at vertex from six human subjects during a series of item recognition tasks. When presented with a test stimulus, the observer had to decide whether it had been memorized previously (i.e., whether it belonged to the positive as opposed to the negative set) and made a choice reaction time response accordingly. P300 amplitude was unequivocally greater following positive letter presentations than it was following negative letter presentations. This result is consistent with a “template-matching” model of P30O enhancement, but, more importantly, it extends the potential generality of this theory beyond the detection of simple sensory stimuli to complex cognitive tasks and stimulus events. The latency of the second positive peak remained essentially invariant across all positive set sizes, a fact which suggested that it reflected the minimum time required to register or encode the stimulus input. In contrast, P300 latency increased as positive set size was increased, i.e., as information processing took longer to complete.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Briggs, G. E. On the predictor variable for choice reaction time. Memory & Cognition, 1974, 2, 575–580.
Burrows, D., & Murdock, B. B., Jr. Effects of extended practice on high-speed scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 82, 231–237.
Chapman, R. M. Evoked potentials of the brain related to thinking. In F. J. McGuigan and R. A. Schoonover (Eds.), The psychophysiologv of thinking. New York: Academic Press. 1973. Pp. 69–108.
Chapman, R. M., & Bragdon, H. R. Evoked responses to numerical and nonnumerical visual stimuli while problem solving. Nature, 1964, 203, 1155–1157.
Corby, J. C., & Kopell, B. S. The effects of predictability on evoked response enhancement in intramodal selective attention. Psychophysiology, 1973, 10, 335–346.
Donald, M. W., Jr., & Goff, W. R. Attention-related increases in cortical responsivity dissociated from contingent negative variation. Science, 1971, 172, 1163–1166.
Donchin, E., & Cohen, L. Averaged evoked potentials and intramodality selective attention. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1967, 22, 537–546.
Donchin, E., Kibovy, M., Kutas, M., Johnson, R., Jr., & Herning, R. I. Graded changes in evoked response (P300) amplitude as a function of cognitive activity. Perception & Psychophysics. 1973. 14, 319–324.
Eason, R. G., Harter, M. R., & White, C. T. Effects of attention and arousal on visually evoked cortical potentials and reaction time in man. Physiology and Behavior, 1969, 4. 283-289.
Ford, J. M., Roth, W. T., Dirks, S. J., & Kopell, B. S. Evoked potential correlates of signal recognition between and within modalities. Science. 1973. 181. 465–466.
Hartley, L. R. The effect of stimulus relevance on the cortical evoked potential. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1970. 22. 531–546.
Hillyard, S. A., Hink, R. F., Schwent, V. L., & Picton, T. W. Electrical signs of attention in the human brain. Science. 1973. 182. 177–180.
Hillyard, S. A., Squires, K. C., Bauer, J. W., & Lindsay, P. H. Evoked potential correlates of auditorv signal detection. Science, 1971, 172, 1357–1360.
Jenness, D. Stimulus role and gross differences in the cortical evoked response. Physiology and Behavior, 1972, 9, 141–146.
Karlin, L. Cognition, preparation, and sensory-evoked potentials. Psychological Bulletin. 1970, 73, 122–136.
Posner, M. I., Klein, R., Summers, J., & Buggie, S. On the selection of signals. Memory & Cognition, 1973, 1, 2–12.
Ritter, W., Simson, R., & Vaughan, H. G., Jr. Association cortex potentials and reaction time in auditory discrimination. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1972, 33, 547–555.
Ritter, W., & Vaughan, H. G., Jr. Averaged evoked responses in vigilance and discrimination: A reassessment. Science, 1969, 164. 326-328.
Rohrbaugh, J. W., Donchin, E., & Eriksen, C. W. Decision making and the P300 component of the cortical evoked response. Perception & Psychophxsies, 1974, 15, 368–374.
Roth, W. T., Kopell, B. S., Tinklenberg, J. R., Darley, C. F., Sikora, R., & Vesecky, T. B. The contingent negative variation during a memory retrieval task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1975, 38, 171–174.
Ross, J. Extended practice with a single-character classification task. Perception & Psychophysics, 1970, 8, 276–278.
Sheatz, G. C., & Chapman, R. M. Task relevance and auditory evoked responses. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1969, 26, 468–475.
Squires, K. C., Hillyard, S. A., & Lindsay, P. H. Cortical potentials evoked by confirming and disconfirming feedback following an auditory discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 1973, 13. 25-31. (a)
Squires, K. C., Hillyard, S. A., & Lindsay, P. H. Vertex potentials evoked during auditory signal detection: Relation to decision criteria. Perception & Psychophysics, 1973, 14, 265–272. (b)
Sternberg, S. Memory-scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. American Scientist, 1969, 57. 421-457. (a)
Sternberg, S. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. Acta Psychologica, 1969, 30, 276–315. (b)
Sutton, S. The specification of psychological variables in an average evoked potential experiment. In E. Donchin and D. B. Lindsley (Eds.), Average evoked potentials: Methods, results, evaluations Washington, D. C: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1969. Pp. 237–262.
Tecce, J. J. Attention and evoked potentials in man. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Attention: Contemporary theory and analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970. Pp. 331–365.
Teichner, W. H., & Krebs, M. J. Laws of visual choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 1974, 81, 75–98.
Theios, J., Smith, P. G., Haviland, S. E., Traupmann, J., & May, M. C. Memory scanning as a serial self-terminating process. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 97. 323-336.
Wilkinson, R. T., & Lee, M. V. Auditory evoked potentials and selective attention. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1972, 33, 411–418.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gomer, F.E., Spicuzza, R.J. & O’Donnell, R.D. Evoked potential correlates of visual item recognition during memory-scanning tasks. Psychobiology 4, 61–65 (1976). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03326547
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03326547