Abstract
Six experiments examined orientation-specific effects of stimulus context on the visual perception of horizontal and vertical lengths: Using a paired-comparison method, Experiments 1–5 showed that the probability of judging a given vertical line to be longer than a given horizontal line was relatively great when the stimulus set comprised relatively long horizontals and short verticals, and relatively small when the stimulus set comprised short horizontals with long verticals. To the extent that stimulus context exerts orientation-specific effects on perceived length, it thereby modulates the degree to which verticals appear longer than physically equivalent horizontals: the horizontal—vertical illusion (HVI). Under various contextual conditions, the HVI was as small as 3% (horizontals had to be 3% greater than verticals to be perceived as equally long) and as great as 15%, equaling about 12% in a “neutral” context. In Experiment 6, subjects judged the absolute physical length of each stimulus, and the results indicated that stimulus context acted largely by decreasing perceived lengths. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that differential effects of context reflect a process of stimulus-specific perceptual attenuation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Caelli, T. (1977). Is perceived length affected by interactions between orientation detectors?Vision Research,17, 837–841.
Collani, G. von (1985). The horizontal—vertical illusion in photographs of concrete scenes with and without depth information.Perceptual & Motor Skills,61, 523–531.
Finger, F. W., &Spelt, D. K. (1947). The illustration of the horizontal—vertical illusion.Journal of Experimental Psychology,37, 243–250.
Foley, H. J., Cross, D. V., &O’Reilly, J. A. (1990). Pervasiveness and magnitude of context effects: Evidence for the relativity of absolute magnitude estimation.Perception & Psychophysics,48, 551–558.
Girgus, J. S., &Coren, S. (1975). Depth cues and constancy scaling in the horizontal—vertical illusion: The bisection error.Canadian Journal of Psychology,29, 59–65.
Helson, H. (1964).Adaptation level theory: An experimental and systematic approach to behavior. New York: Harper & Row.
Künnapas, T. M. (1955). An analysis of the “vertical—horizontal illusion.”Journal of Experimental Psychology,49, 134–140.
Künnapas, T. M. (1957). Vertical-horizontal illusion and surrounding field.Acta Psychologica,13, 35–42.
Künnapas, T. M. (1959). The vertical—horizontal illusion in artificial visual fields.Journal of Psychology,47, 41–48.
Marks, L. E. (1988). Magnitude estimation and sensory matching.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 511–525.
Marks, L. E. (1992a). The contingency of perceptual processing: Context modifies equal-loudness relations.Psychological Science,3, 285–291.
Marks, L. E. (1992b). The slippery context effect in psychophysics: Intensive, extensive and qualitative continua.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 187–198.
Marks, L. E. (1993). Contextual processing of multidimensional and unidimensional auditory stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 227–249.
Marks, L. E. (1994). “Recalibrating” the auditory system: The perception of loudness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 382–396.
Marks, L. E. (1996). Recalibrating the perception of loudness: Interaural transfer.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,100, 473–480.
Marks, L. E., &Armstrong, L. (1996). Visual and haptic representations of space. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.),Attention and performance XVI (pp. 263–287). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marks, L. E., Stevens, J. C., Bartoshuk, L. M., Gent, J. F., Rifkin, B., &Stone, V. K. (1988). Magnitude-matching: The measurement of taste and smell.Chemical Senses,13, 63–87.
Marks, L. E., &Warner, E. (1991). Slippery context effect and critical bands.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 986–996.
Masin, S. C., &Vidotto, G. (1983). A magnitude estimation study of the inverted-T illusion.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 582–584.
Potts, B. C. (1991).The horizontal—vertical illusion: A conf luence of configural, contextual, and framing factors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University.
Poulton, E. C. (1989).Bias in quantifying judgments. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
Prinzmetal, W., &Gettleman, L. (1993). Horizontal-vertical illusion: One eye is better than two.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 81–88.
Rankin, K. M. (1993).Differential effects of context on intensity judgements of taste and smell: Perceptual change or judgemental bias? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stockholm University.
Rankin, K. M., &Marks, L. E. (1991). Differential context effects in taste perception.Chemical Senses,16, 617–629.
Rankin, K. M., &Marks, L. E. (1992). Effects of context on sweet and bitter tastes: Unrelated to sensitivity to PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil).Perception & Psychophysics,52, 479–486.
Schneider, B., &Parker, S. (1990). Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgments?Perception & Psychophysics,48, 409–418.
Stevens, S. S. (1958). Adaptation-level vs. the relativity of judgment.American Journal of Psychology,71, 633–646.
Tedford, W. H., Jr., &Tudor, L. L. (1969). Tactual and visual illusions in the T-shaped figure.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 199–201.
Teghtsoonian, M. (1972). Apparent length as a function of tilt does not depend on orientation of the standard.Journal of Experimental Psychology,94, 191–197.
Tukey, J. (1977).Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Verrillo, R. T., &Irvin, G. (1979). Absolute magnitude estimation of line length as a function of orientation and contrast polarity.Sensory Processes,3, 261–274.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grants 1RO1 DC00818-04 and 5RO1 DC00271-12 from the National Institutes of Health to L.E.M.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Armstrong, L., Marks, L.E. Differential effects of stimulus context on perceived length: Implications for the horizontal-vertical illusion. Perception & Psychophysics 59, 1200–1213 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214208
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214208