Abstract
In this experiment, Ss were visually presented with the names of two animals and were required to throw a switch under the name of the larger animal. Although error rates were relatively low (4.5%), reaction time (RT) was largely an inverse linear function of the logarithm of the estimated difference in animal size. Since RT is similarly related to size differences when Ss make direct perceptual comparisons (e.g., of lengths of line),.it was argued that Ss compare animal names by making an “internal psychophysical judgment.” A more general model was then proposed for answering, from memory, questions of the form, “Which is /X/, /A/ or [B/?” where /X/ is any comparative adjective and /A/and /B/ are any concrete nouns.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
De Soto, C. B., London, M., & Handel, S. Social reasoning and spatial paralogic. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1965, 2, 513–521.
John, E. R.Mechanisms of memory. New York: Academic Press, 1967.
John, E. R. Switchboard versus statistical theories of learning and memory. Science, 1972, 177, 850–864.
Johnson, D. M. Confidence and speed in the two-category judgment. Archives of Psychology, 1939, No. 241, 1–52.
Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. Time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature, 1967, 215, 1519–1520.
Parkman, J. M. Temporal aspects of digit and letter inequality judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 91, 191–205.
Sekuler, R., Rubin, E., & Armstrong, R. Processing numerical information: A choice time analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 89, 75–80.
Shepard, R. N., & Chipman, S. Second-order isomorphism of internal representations: Shapes of states. Cognitive Psychology, 1970, 1, 1–17.
Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I.The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1944.
Welford, A. T. The measurement of sensory-motor performance: Survey and reappraisal of twelve years’ progress. Ergonomics, 1960, 3, 189–230.
Woodworth, R. S. & Schlosberg, H.Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1954.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I thank Rich Freund, Tom Landauer, and Dave Meyer for helpful comments on various stages of the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moyer, R.S. Comparing objects in memory: Evidence suggesting an internal psychophysics. Perception & Psychophysics 13, 180–184 (1973). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214124
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214124