Abstract
Many theories of memory predict that the slope of the z-transformed receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve should decrease with increases in the memory strength of old items. While several prior studies have failed to demonstrate this effect, the results of two experiments demonstrate that increasing presentation duration can reduce the slope of the z-transformed ROC curve. These results raise questions about the generality of prior results and of dual-process theories designed to accommodate those results. We close by emphasizing that determining the experimental circumstances that affect whether or not the slope of the z-transformed ROC curve decreases will provide important constraints on theories of recognition memory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,19, 1–65.
Glanzer, M., &Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 5–16.
Glanzer, M., Adams, J. K., Iverson, G., &Kim, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory.Psychological Review,100, 546–567.
Glanzer, M., Kim, K., Hilford, A., &Adams, J. K. (1999). Slope of the receiver operating characteristic in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 500–513.
Green, D., &Swets, J. (1966).Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
Gronlund, S. D., &Elam, L. E. (1994). List-length effect: Recognition accuracy and variance of underlying distributions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1355–1369.
Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,95, 528–551.
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses ofmemory.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 513–541.
Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information.Psychological Review,89, 609–626.
Ogilvie, J., &Creelman, C. (1968). Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic curve parameters.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,5, 377–391.
Ratcliff, R, McKoon, G., &Tindall, M. (1994). Empirical generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for the global memory models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 763–785.
Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C.-F., &Gronlund, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves.Psychological Review,99, 518–535.
Thorndike, E. L., &Lorge, I. (1944).The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1341–1354.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity.Memory & Cognition,25, 747–763.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Research Grant SBR-9420248 from the National Science Foundation to the first author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hirshman, E., Hostetter, M. Using ROC curves to test models of recognition memory: The relationship between presentation duration and slope. Memory & Cognition 28, 161–166 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213795
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213795