Abstract
Any individual living or working in an odorous environment can experience changes in odor perception, some of which are long lasting. Often, these individuals report a significant reduction in the perception of an odor following long-term exposure to that odor (adaptation). Yet, most experimental analyses of olfactory adaptation use brief odorant exposures which may not typify real-world experiences. Using a procedure combining long-term odor exposure in a naturalistic setting with psychophysical tests in the laboratory, we present evidence to show that reduced odor intensity following long-term exposure is accompanied by odorant-specific shifts in threshold. Subjects were exposed continuously to one of two odorants while in their home for a period of 2 weeks. Exposure produced an odorant-specific reduction in sensitivity and perceived intensity compared with preexposure baselines: Detection thresholds for the adapting odorant were elevated following exposure and perceived intensity ratings for weak concentrations were reduced. For most individuals, reduced sensitivity to the test odorant was still evident up to 2 weeks following the last exposure. The persistence of the change, as evidenced by the duration of recovery from adaptation, distinguishes this phenomenon from the adaptation seen following shorter exposures and highlights the need for the study of exposure durations that are more similar to real-world exposures.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahlström, R., Berglund, B., Berglund, U., Lindvall, T., &Wennberg, A. (1986). Impaired odor perception in tank cleaners.Scandinavian Journal of Work & Environmental Health,12, 574–581.
Anderson, I., Lundqvist, G. R., Molhave, L., Pederson, O. F., Proctor, D. F., Vaeth, M., &Wyon, D. P. (1983). Human response to controlled levels of toluene in 6-hour exposures.Scandinavian Journal of Work & Environmental Health,9, 405–418.
Benignus, V. A., Muller, K. K., Graham, J. A., &Barton, C. N. (1984). Toluene levels in blood and brain of rats as a function of toluene level in inspired air.Environmental Research,33, 39–46.
Berglund, B. (1974). Quantitative and qualitative analysis of industrial odors with human observers. In W. S. Cain (Ed.),Odors: Evaluation, utilization and control (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 237, pp. 35–51). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Berglund, B. (1977).Quality, intensity and time in olfactory perception (Report No. 505). Stockholm: University of Stockholm, Department of Psychology.
Berglund, B., Berglund, U., Engen, T., &Lindvall, T. (1971). The effect of adaptation on odor detection.Perception & Psychophysics,9, 435–438.
Berglund, B., &Engen, T. (1993). A comparison of self-adaptation and cross-adaptation to odorants presented singly and in mixtures.Perception,22, 103–111.
Cain, W. S. (1970). Odor intensity after self-adaptation and crossadaptation.Perception & Psychophysics,7, 271–275.
Cain, W. S. (1974). Perception of odor intensity and the time-course of olfactory adaptation.ASHRAE Transactions,80, 53–75.
Cain, W. S., &Polak, E. H. (1992). Olfactory adaption as an aspect of odor similarity.Chemical Senses,17, 481–491.
Cheesman, G. H., &Mayne, S. (1953). The influence of adaptation on absolute threshold measurements for olfactory stimuli.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,5, 22–30.
Cometto-Muñiz, J. E., &Cain, W. S. (1995). Olfactory adaptation. In R. L. Doty (Ed.),Handbook of olfaction and gustation (pp. 257–281). New York: Marcel Dekker.
Cunzeman, P. J., &Slotnick, B. M. (1984). Prolonged exposure to odors in the rat: Effects on odor detection and mitral cells.Chemical Senses,9, 351–361.
Dravnieks, A. (1985).Atlas of odor character profiles. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials.
Ekblom, A., Flock, A., Hansson, P., & Ottoson, D. (1984). Ultrastructural and electrophysiological changes in the olfactory epithelium following exposure to organic solvents.Acta Otolaryngologica,98, 351–361.
Ekman, G., Berglund, B., Berglund, U., &Lindvall, T. (1967). Perceived intensity of odor as a function of time of adaptation.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,8, 177–186.
Engen, T. (1982).The perception of odors. New York: Academic Press.
Gagnon, P., Mergler, D., &Lapare, S. (1994). Olfactory adaptation, threshold shift and recovery at low levels of exposure to methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK).Neurotoxicology,15, 637–642.
Getchell, T. V. (1986). Functional properties of vertebrate olfactory receptor neurons.Journal of Physiology,3, 772–809.
Green, B. G., Dalton, P., Cowart, B., Shaffer, G., Rankin, K., Pierce, J., & Higgins, J. (in press). Further evaluations of the utility and “validity” of the labeled magnitude scale. Chemical Senses.
Green, B. G., Shaffer, G. S., &Gilmore, M. M. (1993). Derivation and evaluation of a semantic scale of oral sensation magnitude with apparent ratio properties.Chemical Senses,18, 683–702.
Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A. (1966).Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
Köster, E. P. (1971). Adaptation and cross-adaptation in olfaction: An experimental study with olfactory stimuli at low levels of intensity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Laing, D. G., &Panhuber, H. (1978).Olfactory sensitivity of rats reared in an odorous or deodorized environment.Physiology & Behavior,25, 555–558.
Laing, D. G., &Panhuber, H. (1987). Neural and behavioral changes in rats following continuous exposure to an odor.Journal of Comparative Physiology,124, 259–265.
Maruniak, J., Silver, W., &Moulton, D. G. (1983). Olfactory receptors respond to blood-borne odorants.Brain Research,265, 312–316.
Mergler, D., &Beauvais, B. (1992). Olfactory threshold shift following controlled 7-hour exposure to toluene and/or xylene.Neurotoxicology,13, 211–216.
Mozell, M. M. (1962). Olfactory mucosal and neural responses in the frog.American Journal of Physiology,203, 353–358.
Panhuber, H., Mackay-Sim, A., &Laing, D. G. (1987). Prolonged odor exposure causes severe cell shrinkage in the rat olfactory bulb.Developmental Brain Research,31, 307–311.
Pierce, J. D., Wysocki, C. J., &Aronov, E. V. (1993). Mutual crossadaptation of the volatile steroid androstenone and a non-steroid perceptual analog.Chemical Senses,18, 245–256.
Post, R. M. (1980). Minireview: Intermittent versus continuous stimulation: Effect of time interval on the development of sensitization or tolerance.Life Sciences,26, 1275–1282.
Potter, H., &Chorover, S. (1976). Response plasticity in hamster olfactory bulb: Peripheral and central processes.Brain Research,116, 417–429.
Pryor, G. T., Steinmetz, G., &Stone, H. (1970). Changes in absolute detection threshold and in subjective intensity of suprathreshold stimuli during olfactory adaptation and recovery.Perception & Psychophysics,8, 331–335.
Rabin, M. D., &Cain, W. S. (1986). Determinants of measured olfactory sensitivity.Perception & Psychophysics,39, 281–286.
Schiet, F. T., &Cain, W. S. (1990). Odor intensity of mixed and unmixed stimuli under environmentally realistic conditions.Perception,19, 123–132.
Schwartz, B. S., Ford, P., Bolla, K. I., Agnew, J., &Bleecker, L. (1991). Solvent-associated olfactory dysfunction: Not a predictor of deficits in learning and memory.American Journal of Psychiatry,148, 751–756.
Semb, G. (1968). The detectability of the odor of butanol.Perception & Psychophysics,4, 335–340.
Steinmetz, G., Pryor, G. T., &Stone, H. (1970). Olfactory adaptation and recovery in man as measured by two psychophysical techniques.Perception & Psychophysics,8, 327–330.
Thompson, R. F., &Spencer, W. A. (1966). Habituation: A model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior.Psychological Review,73, 16–43.
Todrank, J., Wysocki, C. J., &Beauchamp, G. K. (1991). The effects of adaptation on the perception of similar and dissimilar odors.Chemical Senses,16, 467–482.
Voight, R., &Atema, J. (1990). Adaptation in chemoreceptor cells. III. Effects of cumulative adaptation.Journal of Comparative Physiology,166, 865–874.
Wang, H.-W., Wysocki, C. J., &Gold, G. (1993). Induction of olfactory receptor sensitivity in mice.Science,260, 998–1000.
Wysocki, C. J., Dorries, K. A., &Beauchamp, G. K. (1989). Ability to perceive androstenone can be acquired by ostensibly anosmic people.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science,86, 7976–7978.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant 1 F32 DC00197-01 to P.D., NIH Grant 5 RO1 DC002948-09 to C.J.W., and NIH Institutional Training Grant No. 5 T32 DC00014-17 to Monell Chemical Senses Center.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dalton, P., Wysocki, C.J. The nature and duration of adaptation following long-term odor exposure. Perception & Psychophysics 58, 781–792 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213109
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213109