Abstract
In an extension of a study by Vitu, O’Regan, Inhoff, and Topolski (1995), we compared global and local characteristics of eye movements during (1) reading, (2) the scanning of transformed text (in which each letter was replaced with a z), and (3) visual search. Additionally, we examined eye behavior with respect to specific target words of high or low frequency. Globally, the reading condition led to shorter fixations, longer saccades, and less frequent skipping of target strings than did scanning transformed text. Locally, the manipulation of word frequency affected fixation durations on the target word during reading, but not during visual search or z-string scanning. There were also more refixations on target words in reading than in scanning. Contrary to Vitu et al.’s (1995) findings, our results show that eye movements are not guided by a global strategy and local tactics, but by immediate processing demands.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., &Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading.Cognitive Psychology,17, 364–390.
Ehrlich, S. F., &Rayner, K. (1981). Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 641–655.
Francis, W. N., &Kuccera, H. (1982).Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Henderson, J. M., &Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 417–429.
Hogaboam, T. W. (1983). Reading patterns in eye movement data. In K. Rayner (Ed.),Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes (pp. 309–332). New York: Academic Press.
Inhoff, A. W. (1984). Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 612–624.
Inhoff, A. W. (1989). Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 544–555.
Inhoff, A. W., &Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 431–439.
Inhoff, A. W., &Topolski, R. (1994). Use of phonological codes during eye fixations in reading and in on-line and delayed naming tasks.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 689–713.
Inhoff, A. W., Topolski, R., Vitu, F., &O’Regan, J. K. (1993). Attention demands during reading and the occurrence of brief (express) fixations.Perception & Psychophysics,54, 814–823.
McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., &Zola, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words.Vision Research,28, 1107–1118.
Morrison, R. E. (1984). Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 667–682.
O’Regan, J. K. (1979). Saccade size control in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 501–509.
O’Regan, J. K. (1990). Eye movements and reading. In E. Kowler (Ed.),Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (pp. 395–453). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
O’Regan, J. K. (1992). Optimal viewing position in words and the strategy-tactics theory of eye movements in reading. In K. Rayner (Ed.),Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 333–354). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Pollatsek, A., &Rayner, K. (1990). Eye movements and lexical access in reading. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d’Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.),Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 143–163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., &Balota, D. A. (1986). Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 123–130.
Radach, R., &Kempe, V. (1993). An individual analysis of initial fixation positions in reading. In G. d’Ydewalle & J. van Rensbergen (Eds.),Perception and cognition: Advances in eye movement research (pp. 213–226). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
Raney, G. E., &Rayner, K. (1995). Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,49, 151–172.
Rayner, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words.Perception,8, 21–30.
Rayner, K. (1995). Eye movements and cognitive processes in reading, visual search, and scene perception. In J. M. Findlay, R. W. Kentridge, & R. Walker (Eds.),Eye movement research: Mechanisms, processes and applications (pp. 3–22). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
Rayner, K., &Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.Memory & Cognition,14, 191–201.
Rayner, K., &McConkie, G. W. (1976). What guides a reader’s eye movements?Vision Research,16, 829–837.
Rayner, K., &Morris, R. K. (1992). Eye movements in reading: Evidence against semantic preprocessing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 167–179.
Rayner, K., &Pollatsek, A. (1987). Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 327–362). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rayner, K., &Pollatsek, A. (1989).The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Rayner, K., &Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading and visual search: Effects of word frequency.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 245–248.
Rayner, K., &Sereno, S. C. (1994). Eye movements in reading: Psycholinguistic studies. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.),Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 57–81). San Diego: Academic Press.
Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Morris, R. K., Schmauder, A. R., &Clifton, C., Jr. (1989). Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes.Language & Cognitive Processes,4, 21–49.
Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., & Raney, G. E. (in press). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Rayner, K., Slowiaczek, M. L., Clifton, C., Jr., &Bertera, J. H. (1983). Latency of sequential eye movements: Implications for reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 912–922.
Salthouse, T. A., &Ellis, C. L. (1980). Determinants of eye fixation duration.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 611–623.
Sereno, S. C. (1992). Early lexical effects when fixating a word in reading. In K. Rayner (Ed.),Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 304–316). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Vitu, F. (1991). The influence of parafoveal processing and linguistic context on the optimal landing position effect.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 58–75.
Vitu, F. (1993). The influence of the reading rhythm on the optimal landing position effect. In G. d’Ydewalle & J. Van Rensbergen (Eds.),Perception and cognition: Advances in eye movement research (pp. 181–192). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
Vitu, F., O’Regan, J. K., Inhoff, A. W., &Topolski, R. (1995). Mindless reading: Eye movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading texts.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 352–364.
Vitu, F., O’Regan, J. K., &Mittau, M. (1990). Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 583–600.
Zola, D. (1984). Redundancy and word perception during reading.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 277–284.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant HD26765 from the National Institutes of Health. K.R. was also supported by a Research Scientist Award from the National Institutes of Mental Health (MH01255).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rayner, K., Fischer, M.H. Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different. Perception & Psychophysics 58, 734–747 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213106
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213106