Abstract
Watson and Humphreys (1997,1998) have recently demonstrated that new objects can be prioritized for visual attentional processing by the top-down attentional inhibition of old objects already in the field, a mechanism they calledvisual marking. The experiments reported here show that the detection of a dim probe dot is impaired when it falls at the location of an old object (Experiments 1 and 3) but that this occurs only in conditions in which it is advantageous for subjects to mark (inhibit) old objects (Experiment 2). These results further support previous work showing that visual marking is based on the inhibition of the locations of old objects and that visual marking can be flexibly applied (or with-held), depending on the goals of current behavior.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, D. A. (1987). Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.).Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 395–419). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cepeda, N. J., Cave, K. R., Bichot, N. P., &Kim, M.-S. (1998). Spatial selection via feature-driven inhibition of distractor locations.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 727–746.
Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli.Psychological Review,87, 272–300.
Humphreys, G. W., &Müller, H. J. (1993). Search via recursive rejection (SERR): A connectionist model of visual search.Cognitive Psychology,25, 43–110.
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and Performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kim, M.-S., &Cave, K. R. (1995). Spatial attention in visual search for features and feature conjunctions.Psychological Science,6, 376–380.
Klein, R. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search.Nature,334, 430–431.
Loftus, G. R., &Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 476–490.
Posner, M. I. &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.)Attention and performance X: Control ojlanguage processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., &Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 160–174.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1989). The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model.Cognition,32, 65–97.
Pylyshyn, Z. [W.], Burkell, J., Fisher, B., Sears, C, Schmidt, W., &Trick, L. (1994). Multiple parallel access in visual attention.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,48, 260–283.
Townsend, J. T. (1972). Some results on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes.British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology,25, 168–199.
Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G. W. (1995). Attention capture by contour onsets and offsets: No special role for onsets.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 583–597.
Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition.Psychological Review,104, 90–122.
Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G. W. (1998). Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 946–962.
Wolfe, J. M., &Pokorny, C. W. (1990). Inhibitory tagging in visual search: A failure to replicate.Perception & Psychophysics,48, 357–362.
Wright, R. D. (1994). Shifts of visual attention to multiple simultaneous location cues.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,48, 205–217.
Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 676–681.
Yantis, S., &Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 95–107.
Yantis, S., &Johnson, D. N. (1990). Mechanisms of attentional priority.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 812–825.
Yantis, S., &Jones, E. (1991). Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 166–178.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1996). Attentional capture by abrupt visual onsets: New perceptual objects or visual masking?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1505–1513.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by a grant from the Medical Research Council (U.K.).
—Accepted by previous editor, Myron L. Braunstein
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Watson, D.G., Humphreys, G.W. Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics 62, 471–481 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212099
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212099