Abstract
Perceptual judgments can be affected by expectancies regarding the likely target modality. This has been taken as evidence for selective attention to particular modalities, but alternative accounts remain possible in terms of response priming, criterion shifts, stimulus repetition, and spatial confounds. We examined whether attention to a sensory modality would still be apparent when these alternatives were ruled out. Subjects made a speeded detection response (Experiment 1), an intensity or color discrimination (Experiment 2), or a spatial discrimination response (Experiments 3 and 4) for auditory and visual targets presented in a random sequence. On each trial, a symbolic visual cue predicted the likely target modality. Responses were always more rapid and accurate for targets presented in the expected versus unexpected modality, implying that people can indeed selectively attend to the auditory or visual modalities. When subjects were cued to both the probable modality of a target and its likely spatial location (Experiment 4), separable modality-cuing and spatial-cuing effects were observed. These studies introduce appropriate methods for distinguishing attention to a modality from the confounding factors that have plagued previous normal and clinical research.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alho, K., Woods, D. L., &Algazi, A. (1994). Processing of auditory stimuli during auditory and visual attention as revealed by eventrelated potentials.Psychophysiology,31, 469–479.
Alho, K., Woods, D. L., Algazi, A., &Näätänen, R. (1992). Intermodal selective attention: II. Effects of attentional load on processing of auditory and visual stimuli in central space.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,82, 356–368.
Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., &Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Auerbach, C., &Sperling, P. (1974). A common auditory-visual space: Evidence for its reality.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 129–135.
Boulter, L. R. (1977). Attention and reaction times to signals of uncertain modality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 379–388.
Ciesielski, K. T., Courchesne, E., &Elmasian, R. (1990). Effects of focused selective attention tasks on event-related potentials in autistic and normal individuals.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,75, 207–220.
Ciesielski, K. T., Knight, J. E., Prince, R. J., Harris, R. J., &Handmaker, S. D. (1995). Event-related potentials in cross-modal divided attention in autism.Neuropsychologia,33, 225–246.
Courchesne, E., Akshoomoff, N., Townsend, J., Yeung-Courchesne, R., Lincoln, A., James, H., Haas, R., Schreibman, L., &Lau, L. (1993). Impairment in shifting attention in autistic and cerebellar patients. In S. H. Broman & J. Grafman (Eds.),Atypical cognitive deficits in developmental disorders: Implications for brain function (pp. 67–83). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dinnerstein, A. J., &Zlotogura, P. (1968). Intermodal perception of temporal order and motor skills: Effects of age.Perceptual & Motor Skills,26, 987–1000.
Dixon, P., &Just, A. M. (1986). A chronometric analysis of strategy preparation in choice reactions.Memory & Cognition,14, 488–500.
Driver, J., &Spence, C. J. (1994). Spatial synergies between auditory and visual attention. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 311–331). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Eijkman, E., &Vendrik, J. H. (1965). Can a sensory system be specified by its internal noise?Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,37, 1102–1109.
Ferstl, R., Hanewinkel, R., &Krag, P. (1994). Is the modality-shift effect specific for schizophrenia patients?Schizophrenia Bulletin,2, 367–373.
Guttentag, R. E. (1985). A developmental study of attention to auditory and visual signals.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,39, 546–561.
Hackley, S. A., Woldorff, M., &Hillyard, S. A. (1990). Crossmodal selective attention effects on retinal, myogenic, brainstem, and cerebral evoked potentials.Psychophysiology,27, 195–208.
Hafter, E. R., & Bonnel, A.-M. (1995, June).Shared attention in detection and identification. Paper presented at the 129th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America (Washington, DC).
Hannes, M., Sutton, S., &Zubin, J. (1968). Reaction time: Stimulus uncertainty with response certainty.Journal of General Psychology,78, 165–181.
Harvey, N. (1980). Non-informative effects of stimuli functioning as cues.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 413–425.
Hillyard, S. A., Simpson, G. V., Woods, D. L., Van Voorhis, S., &Münte, T. F. (1984). Event-related brain potentials and selective attention to different modalities. In F. Reinoso-Suárez & C. Ajmone-Marson (Eds.),Cortical integration (pp. 395–414). New York: Raven Press.
Hohnsbein, J., Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., &Blanke, L. (1991). Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. 1. Simple and choice reaction tasks.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,78, 438–446.
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Klein, R. M. (1977). Attention and visual dominance: A chronometric analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 365–378.
Klein, R. M., Kingstone, A., &Pontefract, A. (1992). Orienting of visual attention. In K. Rayner (Ed.),Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 46–65). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Kraeplin, E. (1919).Dementia praecox and paraphrenia. Chicago: Medical Books.
Kristofferson, A. B. (1965).Attention in time discrimination and reaction time (NASA Contractors Report 194). Washington, DC: Office of Technical Services, U.S. Department of Commerce.
Kristofferson, M. W. (1967). Shifting attention between modalities.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,72, 388–394.
LaBerge, D. (1973). Identification of two components of the time to switch attention: A test of a serial and a parallel model of attention. In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and performance IV (pp. 71–85). New York: Academic Press.
LaBerge, D., Van Gelder, P., &Yellott, J., Jr. (1970). A cueing technique in choice reaction time.Perception & Psychophysics,7, 57–62.
Mannuzza, S. (1980). Cross-modal reaction time and schizophrenic attentional deficit: A critical review.Schizophrenia Bulletin,6, 654–675.
Massaro, D. W., &Kahn, B. J. (1973). Effects of central processing on auditory recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology,97, 51–58.
Massaro, D. W., &Warner, D. S. (1977). Dividing attention between auditory and visual perception.Perception & Psychophysics,21, 569–574.
Miller, J. O. (1988). A warning about median reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 539–543.
Mowrer, O. H., Rayman, N. N., &Bliss, E. L. (1940). Preparatory set (expectancy)—An experimental demonstration of its ‘central’ locus.Journal of Experimental Psychology,26, 357–372.
Mulligan, R. M., &Shaw, M. L. (1981). Attending to simple auditory and visual signals.Perception & Psychophysics,30, 447–454.
Münte, T. F., Blum, H., &Heinze, H.-J. (1993). Attentional orienting to visual targets after visual and auditory cues: An analysis with event-related brain potentials.Zeitschrift EEG-EMG,24, 225–233.
Parasuraman, R. (1985). Event-related brain potentials and intermodal divided attention.Proceedings of the Human Factors Society,29, 971–975.
Pashler, H., &Baylis, G. (1991). Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 33–48.
Phipps-Yonas, S. (1984). Visual and auditory reaction time in children vulnerable to psychopathology.Minnesota High-Risk Studies,6, 312–319.
Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., &Klein, R. M. (1976). Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance.Psychological Review,83, 157–171.
Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., &Ogden, W. C. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In H. I. Pick & E. Saltzman (Eds.),Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp. 137–157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P. A., Brennan, C. W., &Sciolto, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 673–685.
Rist, F., &Cohen, R. (1987). Effects of modality shift on event-related potentials and reaction time of chronic schizophrenics. In R. Hohnson, Jr., J. W. Rohrbaugh, & R. Parasuraman (Eds.),Current trends in event-related potential research (pp. 738–745). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Rist, F., &Thurm, I. (1984). Effects of intramodal and crossmodal stimulus diversity on the reaction time of chronic schizophrenics.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,93, 331–338.
Robin, D. A., &Rizzo, M. (1989). The effect of focal cerebral lesions on intramodal and cross-modal orienting of attention. In T. E. Prescott (Ed.),Clinical aphasiology (Vol. 18, pp. 61–74). Boston: College-Hill.
Robin, D. A., &Rizzo, M. (1992). Orienting of attention in audition and between audition and vision: Young and elderly subjects.Journal of Speech & Hearing Research,35, 701–707.
Rogers, D. R., &Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 207–231.
Shallice, T. (1988).From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shaw, M. L. (1984). Division of attention among spatial locations: A fundamental difference between detection of letters and detection of luminance increments. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X (pp. 109–121). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Grantham, D. W. (1974). Can attention be allocated to sensory modalities?Perception & Psychophysics,15, 460–474.
Simpson, W. E. (1972). Latency of locating lights and sounds.Journal of Experimental Psychology,93, 169–175.
Spence, C., &Driver, J. (1994). Covert spatial orienting in audition: Exogenous and endogenous mechanisms.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 555–574.
Spence, C., &Driver, J. (1996). Audiovisual links in endogenous covert spatial attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1005–1030.
Spence, C., &Driver, J. (1997). Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 1–22.
Spence, C., Driver, J., & Rogers, R. (1997).Is there an attentional component to the MSE? Manuscript in preparation.
Spring, B. J. (1980). Shift of attention in schizophrenics, siblings of schizophrenics, and depressed patients.Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease,168, 133–140.
Sutton, S., Hakerem, G., Zubin, J., &Portnoy, M. (1961). The effect of shift of sensory modality on serial reaction time: A comparison of schizophrenics and normals.American Journal of Psychology,74, 224–232.
Sutton, S., &Zubin, J. (1965). Effect of sequence on reaction time in schizophrenia. In A. T. Welford & J. E. Birren (Eds.),Behavior, ageing and the nervous system (pp. 562–597). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Ulrich, R., &Miller, J. (1994). Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 34–80.
Verleger, R., &Cohen, R. (1978). Effects of certainty, modality shift and guess outcome on evoked potentials and reaction times in chronic schizophrenics.Psychological Medicine,8, 81–93.
Waldbaum, J. K., Sutton, S., &Kerr, J. (1975). Shifts of sensory modality and reaction time in schizophrenia. In M. L. Kietzman, S. Sutton, & J. Zubin (Eds.),Experimental approaches to psychopathology (pp. 167–176). New York: Academic Press.
Woods, D. L., Alho, K., &Algazi, A. (1992). Intermodal selective attention: 1. Effects on event-related potentials to lateralized auditory and visual stimuli.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,82, 341–355.
Woods, D. L., Alho, K., &Algazi, A. (1993). Intermodal selective attention: Evidence for processing in tonotopic auditory fields.Psychophysiology,30, 287–295.
Wundt, W. (1893).Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie [Foundations of physiological psychology] (4th ed.). Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This work was supported by grants from the Medical Research Council (U.K.) and by a Junior Research Fellowship to the first author from St. John’s College, Cambridge.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spence, C., Driver, J. On measuring selective attention to an expected sensory modality. Perception & Psychophysics 59, 389–403 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211906
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211906