Abstract
Two experiments investigated whether there is evidence for acquisition of rules in implicit artificial grammar learning (AGL). Two different methods were used in meeting this goal, multiple regression analysis and analysis of receiver-operating characteristics (ROCs). By means of multiple regression analysis, several types of knowledge were identified that were used in judgments of grammaticality, for example, about single letters and about larger stimulus fragments. There was no evidence for the contribution of rule knowledge. The ROCs were in accord with a similarity-based account of AGL and thus did not support the notion that rule knowledge is acquired in AGL either. Simulations with a connectionist model corroborated the conclusion that the results were in accord with a similarity-based, associative account.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cleeremans, A., Servan-Schreiber, D., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). Finite state automata and simple recurrent networks.Neural Computation,1, 372–381.
Dienes, Z., Altmann, G. T. M., &Gao, S. (1999). Mapping across domains without feedback: A neural network model of transfer of implicit knowledge.Cognitive Science,23, 53–82.
Dienes, Z., Kurz, A., Bernhaupt, R., &Perner, J. (1997). Application of implicit knowledge: Deterministic or probabilistic?Psychologica Belgica,37, 89–113.
Hahn, U., &Chater, N. (1998). Similarity and rules: Distinct? Exhaustive? Empirically distinguishable?Cognition,65, 197–230.
Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., &Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 139–154.
Johnstone, T., &Shanks, D. R. (1999). Two mechanisms in implicit artificial grammar learning? Comment on Meulemans and Van der Linden (1997).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 524–531.
Kinder, A. (2000). The knowledge acquired during artificial grammar learning: Testing the predictions of two connectionist models.Psychological Research,63, 95–105.
Kinder, A., & Shanks, D. R. (in press). Amnesia and the declarative/ nondeclarative distinction: A recurrent network model of classification, recognition, and repetition priming.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
Knowlton, B. J., &Squire, L. R. (1996). Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplarspecific information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 169–181.
Lorch, R. F., &Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 149–157.
Luce, R. D. (1963). A threshold model for simple detection experiments.Psychological Review,70, 61–69.
Mathews, R. C., &Roussel, L. G. (1997). Abstractness of implicit knowledge: A cognitive evolutionary perspective. In D. C. Berry (Ed.),How implicit is implicit learning? (pp. 162–194). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Meulemans, T., &Van der Linden, M. (1997). Associative chunk strength in artificial grammar learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1007–1028.
Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,6, 855–863.
Reber, A. S. (1969). Transfer of syntactic structure in synthetic languages.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 115–119.
Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 219–235.
Redington, M. (1998).On hybrid models of artificial grammar learning: Commentary on Knowlton and Squire (1996) and Meulemans and Van der Linden (1997). Unpublished manuscript.
Redington, M., &Chater, N. (1996). Transfer in artificial grammar learning: A reevaluation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 123–138.
Servan-Schreiber, E., &Anderson, J. R. (1990). Learning artificial grammars with competitive chunking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 592–608.
Shanks, D. R., Johnstone, T., &Staggs, L. (1997). Abstraction processes in artificial grammar learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 216–252.
Vokey, J. R., &Brooks, L. R. (1992). Salience of item knowledge in artificial grammar learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 328–344.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Dorken, M. D. (1993). Incidentally, things in general seem to be particularly determined: An episodic processing account of implicit learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 227–248.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model.Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1341–1354.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity.Memory & Cognition,25, 747–763.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kinder, A., Assmann, A. Learning artificial grammars: No evidence for the acquisition of rules. Memory & Cognition 28, 1321–1332 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211833
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211833