Abstract
The auditory tau and the kappa effects show that there is time-pitch interdependence in our perception. Our judgments of pitch separation between two tones depend on the temporal interval between them (the auditory tau effect), and our judgments of the tones’ temporal interval depend on their pitch separation (the kappa effect). The mechanisms underlying this interdependence were investigated by studying the auditory tau and the kappa effect in three experiments. Comparisons were made between results obtained from subjects with absolute pitch and those who did not have absolute pitch, and two frequency ranges of pure tones (octave and whole-tone conditions) were selected. The procedures had been used in previous experiments (Shigeno, 1986), in which the auditory tau and the kappa effects were compared in speech and nonspeech stimuli. The present results demonstrate that the auditory tau effect does not occur when possessors of absolute pitch judge the closeness of stimuli in pitch, except when the stimulus continuum consists of tones that do not correspond to musical notes in the whole-tone condition. The kappa effect was obtained in the judgment of possessors of absolute pitch in both the octave and the whole-tone conditions. These findings suggest that the interaction between temporal interval and pitch judgment might be explained in terms of the two different memory modes for retaining the pitch of tones, and that these effects occur at the precategorical level.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbe, M. (1936). The spatial effect upon the perception of time.Journal of Experimental Psychology,3, 1–52.
Bachem, A. (1937). Various types of absolute pitch.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,9, 146–151.
Borden, G. J., &Harris, K. S. (1984).Speech science primer. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
Burns, E. M., Campbell, S. L., & Hoberg, K. E. (1989). Is absolute pitch an example of “categorical perception”? InProceedings of the First International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (pp. 421–424). Kyoto, Japan.
Burns, E. M., &Ward, W. D. (1978). Categorical perception—phenomenon or epiphenomenon: Evidence from experiments in the perception of melodic musical intervals.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,63, 456–468.
Christensen, I. P., &Huang, Y. L. (1979). The auditory tau effect and memory for pitch.Perception & Psychophysics,26, 489–494.
Cohen, J., Christensen, I. P., &Ono, A. (1974). Influence of temporal intervals on comparative judgments of pitch: A study of subjective relativity.Tohoku Psychological Folia,33, 76–87.
Cohen, J., Hansel, C. E. M., &Sylvester, J. D. (1953). A new phenomenon in time judgment.Nature,172, 901.
Cohen, J., Hansel, C. E. M., &Sylvester, J. D. (1954). Interdependence of temporal auditory judgments.Nature,174, 642.
Cutting, J. E., &Rosner, B. S. (1974). Categories and boundaries in speech and music.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 564–570.
Helson, H. (1930). The tau effect—An example of psychological relativity.Science,71, 536–537.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., &Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code.Psychological Review,74, 431–461,
Miyazaki, K. (1988). Musical pitch identification by absolute pitch possessors.Perception & Psychophysics,44, 501–512.
Parks, T. E. (1968). The spatial separation of two light-flashes and their perceived separation in time.American Journal of Psychology,81, 92–98.
Pisoni, D. B. (1977). Identification and discrimination of the relative onset time of two component tones: Implication for voicing perception in stops.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,61, 1352–1361.
Pisoni, D. B., CArrell, T. D., &Gans, S. J. (1983). Perception of the duration of rapid spectrum changes in speech and nonspeech signals.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 314–322.
Price-Williams, D. R. (1954). The kappa-effect.Nature,173, 363–364.
Radocy, R. E., &Boyle, J.D. (1979).Psychological foundations of musical behavior. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Repp, B. H., Healy, A. F., &Crowder, R. G. (1979). Categories and context in the perception of isolated steady-state vowels.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 129–145.
Shigeno, S. (1986). The auditory tau and kappa effects for speech and nonspeech stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 9–19.
Shigeno, S. (1987). The auditory tau and kappa effects for voiced stop consonants.Japanese Psychological Research,29, 71–80.
Shigeno, S. (1991). Assimilation and contrast in the phonetic perception of vowels.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,90, 103–111.
Shigeno, S., &Fujisaki, H. (1979). Effect of a preceding anchor upon the categorical judgment ofspeech and non-speech stimuli.Japanese Psychological Research,21, 165–173.
Shigeno, S., &Fujisaki, H. (1980). A comparison of forward versus backward context effect in phonetic and non-phonetic judgments on synthetic vowels.Japanese Journal of Psychology,51, 287–290. (In Japanese, with English summary)
Siegel, J. A. (1974). Sensory and verbal coding strategies in subjects with absolute pitch.Journal of Experimental Psychology,103, 37–44.
Siegel, J. A., &Siegel, W. (1977a). Absolute identification of notes and intervals by musicians.Perception & Psychophysics,21, 143–152.
Siegel, J. A., &Siegel, W. (1977b). Categorical perception of tonal intervals: Musicians can’t tell sharq, from flat.Perception & Psychophysics,21, 399–407.
Ward, W. D., &Burns, E. M. (1982). Absolute pitch. In D. Deutsch (Ed.),The psychology of music (pp. 431–451). New York: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research 02610064 from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shigeno, S. The interdependence of pitch and temporal judgments by absolute pitch possessors. Perception & Psychophysics 54, 682–692 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211792
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211792