Abstract
In four experiments, the effect of the semantic relationship between test and inducing stimuli on the magnitude of size contrast in an Ebbinghaus-type illusion was explored. In Experiments 1 and 2, the greatest illusion was found when test and inducing stimuli were identical in shape and differed only in size. Decreased size contrast was found when inducing stimuli were drawn from the same category as the test stimulus, but were not visually identical. Even less size contrast was found when inducing stimuli were from a near conceptual category, with the least effect when they were drawn from a completely different category. In Experiment 3, it was demonstrated that even if test and inducing stimuli are drawn with identical geometric elements, the size contrast illusion is greatly reduced if they represent apparently different conceptual categories (through the manipulation of orientation and perceptual set). In Experiment 4, any geometric or spatial confounds were ruled out. These results suggest that size contrast is strongly influenced by the conceptual similarity between test and inducing stimuli.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, A. L., &Prawat, R. S. (1983). When is a cup not a cup? A further examination of form and function in children’s labeling responses.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,29, 375–385.
Coren, S. (1971). A size contrast illusion without physical size difference.American Journal of Psychology,84, 565–566.
Coren, S., &Aks, D. J. (1990). Moon illusion in pictures: A multi-mechanism approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 365–380.
Coren, S. &Girgus, J. S. (1972). A comparison of five methods of illusion measurement.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,4, 240–244.
Coren, S., &Girgus, J. S. (1978).Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Coren, S., Girgus, J. S., Erlichman, H., &Hakstian, A. R. (1976). An empirical taxonomy of visual illusions.Perception & Psychophysics,20, 129–137.
Coren, S., &Hoy, V. S. (1986). An orientation illusion analog to the rod and frame: Relational effects in the magnitude of the distortion.Perception & Psychophysics,39, 159–163.
Coren, S., &Miller, J. (1974). Size contrast as a function of figural similarity.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 355–357.
Coren, S., &Porac, C. (1978a). Iris pigmentation and visual-geometric illusions.Perception,7, 473–478.
Coren, S., &Porac, C. (1978b). A new analysis of life-span age trends in visual illusions.Developmental Psychology,14, 193–194.
Coren, S., Ward, L. M., Porac, C., &Fraser, R. (1978). The effect of optical blur on visual-geometric illusions.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,11, 390–392.
Foltz, G. S., &Poltrock, S. E. (1984). Mental comparison of size and magnitude: Size congruity effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 442–453.
Girgus, J. S., &Coren, S. (1982). Assimilation and contrast illusions: Differences in plasticity.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 555–561.
Girgus, J. S., Coren, S., &Agdern, M. (1972). The interrelationship between the Ebbinghaus and Delboef illusions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,95, 453–455.
Helmholtz, H. von (1866).Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. Hamburg & Leipzig: Voss.
Helson, H. (1964).Adaptation level theory: An experimental and systematic approach to behavior. New York: Harper.
Holyoak, K. J., Dumais, S. T., &Moyer, R. S. (1979). Semantic association effects in a mental comparison task.Memory & Cognition,7, 303–313.
Irwin, D. I., &Lupker, S. J. (1983). Semantic priming of pictures and words: A levels of processing approach.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 45–60.
Jordan, K., &English, P. W. (1989). Simultaneous sampling and length contrast.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 546–554.
Jordan, K., &Schiano, D. J. (1986). Serial processing and the parallel-lines illusion: Length contrast through relative spatial separation of contours.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 384–390.
Jordan, K., &Uhlarik, J. (1986). Length contrast in the Müller-Lyer figure: Functional equivalence of temporal and spatial separation.Perception & Psychophysics,39, 267–274.
La Heij, W. (1988). Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming.Memory & Cognition,16, 400–410.
La Heij, W., &Dirkx, J. (1990). Categorical interference and associative priming in picture naming.British Journal of Psychology,81, 511–525.
Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task.Memory & Cognition,7, 485–495.
Lupker, S. J. (1988). Picture naming: An investigation of the nature of categorical priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 444–455.
Marschark, M., &Paivio, A. (1981). Congruity and the perceptual comparison task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 290–308.
Massaro, D. W., &Anderson, N. H. (1971). Judgmental model of the Ebbinghaus illusion.Journal of Experimental Psychology,89, 147–151.
Medin, D. L., &Smith, E. E. (1984). Concepts and concept formation.Annual Review of Psychology,35, 113–138.
Nelson, K. (1988). Where do taxonomic categories come from?Human Development,31, 3–10.
Porac, C., &Coren, S. (1981). Life-span age trends in the perception of the Müller-Lyer: Additional evidence for the existence of two illusions.Canadian Journal of Psychology,35, 58–62.
Porac, C., Coren, S., Girgus, J. S., &Verde, M. (1979). Visual-geometric illusions: Uni-sexed phenomena.Perception,8, 401–412.
Posnansky, C. J., &Rayner, K. (1977). Visual-feature and response components in a picture-word interference task with beginning and skilled readers.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,24, 440–460.
Rayner, K., &Springer, C. J. (1986). Graphemic and semantic similarity effects in the picture-word interference task.British Journal of Psychology,77, 207–222.
Restle, F. (1971). Visual illusions. In M. H. Appley (Ed.),Adaptation level theory (pp. 55–69). New York: Academic Press.
Rosinski, R. R. (1975). Picture-word interference is semantically based.Child Development,48, 643–647.
Shulman, G. L. (1991, November).Attentional modulation of size contrast. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Francisco, CA.
Smith, E. E. (1980). Organization of factual knowledge.Nebraska Symposium on Motivation,28, 163–209.
Sperber, R. D., McCauley, C., Ragain, R., &Well, C. M. (1979). Semantic priming effects on picture and word processing.Memory & Cognition,7, 339–345.
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology,37A, 571–590.
Tipper, S. P., &Driver, J. (1988). Negative priming between pictures and words in a selective attention task: Evidence for semantic processing of ignored stimuli.Memory & Cognition,16, 64–70.
Wallach, H. &Floor, L. (1971). The use of size matching to demonstrate the effectiveness of accommodation and convergence as cues for distance.Perception & Psychophysics,10, 423–428.
Weintraub, D. J., &Schneck, M. K. (1986). Fragments of Delboeuf and Ebbinghaus illusions: Contour/context explorations of misjudged circle size.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 147–158.
Wilson, A. E., &Pressey, A. W. (1988). Contrast and assimilation in the Baldwin illusion.Perceptual & Motor Skills,66, 195–204.
Wundt, W. (1894).Lectures on human and animal psychology (J. E. Creighton & E. B. Titchner, Trans.). London: Swan Sonnenschein.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coren, S., Enns, J.T. Size contrast as a function of conceptual similarity between test and inducers. Perception & Psychophysics 54, 579–588 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211782
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211782