Abstract
The effects of distractor clustering on target detection were examined in two experiments in which subjects attended to binaural tone bursts of one frequency while ignoring distracting tones of two competing frequencies. The subjects pressed a button in response to occasional target tones of longer duration (Experiment 1) or increased loudness (Experiment 2). In evenly spaced conditions, attended and distractor frequencies differed by 6 and 12 semitones, respectively (e.g., 2096-Hz targets vs. 1482- and 1048-Hz distractors). In clustered conditions, distractor frequencies were grouped; attended tones differed from the distractors by 6 and 7 semitones, respectively (e.g., 2096-Hz targets vs. 1482- and 1400-Hz distractors). The tones were presented in randomized sequences at fixed or random stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs). In both experiments, clustering of the unattended frequencies improved the detectability of targets and speeded target reaction times, Similar effects were found at fixed and variable SO As. Results from the analysis of stimulus sequence suggest that clustering improved performance primarily by reducing the interference caused by distractors that immediately preceded the target.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alain, C., Achim, A., & Richer, F. (in press). Perceptual context and the auditory selective attention effect on event-related brain potentials.Psychophysiology.
Alain, C., & Woods, D. L. (1993).Modulations in auditory cortical activity with signal clustering in humans. Manuscript in preparation.
Bregman, A. S. (1990).Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bregman, A. S., &Campbell, J. (1971). Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones.Journal of Experimental Psychology,89, 244–249.
Bregman, A. S., &Rudnicky, A. I. (1975). Auditory segregation: Stream or streams?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,1, 263–267.
Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system.Psychological Bulletin,104, 164–191.
Dannenbring, G. L., &Bregman, A. S. (1976). Effect of silence between tones on auditory stream segregation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,59, 987–989.
French-St. George, M., &Bregman, A. S. (1989). Role of predictability of sequence in auditory stream segregation.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 384–386.
Handel, S., Weaver, M. S., &Lawson, G. (1983). Effect of rhythmic grouping on stream segregation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 637–651.
Jones, M. R. (1976). Time, our lost dimension: Toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory.Psychological Review,83, 323–355.
Jones, M. R., Kidd, J. G., &Wetzel, R. (1981). Evidence for rhythmic attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 1059–1073.
Luce, R. D. (1986).Response time: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Clarendon.
Tougas, Y., &Bregman, A. S. (1985). Crossing of auditory streams.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 788–798.
Woods, D. L. (1990). The physiological basis of selective attention: Implications of event-related potential studies. In J. W. Rohrbaugh, R. Parasuraman, & R. Johnson (Eds.),Event-related brain potentials: Basic issues and applications (pp. 178–209). New York: Oxford University Press.
Woods, D. L. (1992). Auditory selective attention in middle-aged and elderly subjects: An event-related brain potential study.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,84, 456–468.
Woods, D. L., &Alain, C. (1993). Feature processing during high-rate auditory selective attention.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 391–402.
Woods, D. L., Alho, K., & Algazi, A. (in press). Stages of auditory feature conjunction: An event-related brain potential study.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by grants from the NIDCD and the VA Research Service to D. L. Woods, and by a postdoctoral fellowship provided by the Quebec Government Postdoctoral Fellowship (FCAR) to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alain, C., Woods, D.L. Distractor clustering enhances detection speed and accuracy during selective listening. Perception & Psychophysics 54, 509–514 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211773
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211773