Abstract
The vertical-horizontal illusion is the tendency for observers to overestimate the length of a vertical line relative to a horizontal line that has the same length. One explanation of this illusion is that the visual field is elongated in the horizontal direction, and that the vertical-horizontal illusion is a kind of framing effect (Künnapas, 1957a, 1957b, 1957c). Since the monocular visual field is less asymmetric than the combined visual field, this theory predicts that the illusion should be reduced with monocular presentation. This prediction was tested in five experiments, in which the vertical-horizontal illusion was examined in a variety of situations—including observers seated upright versus reclined 90°, monocular presentation with the dominant versus the nondominant eye, viewing in the dark versus in the light, and viewing with asymmetrical frames of reference. The illusion was reliably reduced with monocular presentation under conditions that affected the asymmetry of the phenomenal visual field.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avery, G. C., &Day, R. H. (1969). Basis of the horizontal-vertical illusion.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 376–380.
Banton, T., &Levi, D. M. (1991). Binocular summation in vernier acuity.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,8, 673–680.
Begelman, D. A., &Steinfeld, G. (1967). An investigation of several parameters of the horizontal-vertical illusion.Perception & Psychophysics,2, 539–543.
Blake, R., Sloane, M., &Fox, R. (1981). Further developments in binocular summation.Perception & Psychophysics,30, 266–276.
Coren, S., &Girgus, J. S. (1978).Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Coren, S., &Kaplin, C. P. (1973).American Journal of Optometry & Archives of the American Academy of Optometry,50, 282–292.
Finger, F. W., &Spelt, D. K. (1947). The illustration of the horizontal-vertical illusion.Journal of Experimental Psychology,37, 243–250.
Gillam, B. (1980). Geometrical illusions.Scientific American,242, 102–111.
Girgus, J. S., &Coren, S. (1975). Depth cues and constancy scaling in the horizontal-vertical illusion: The bisection error.Canadian Journal of Psychology,29, 59–65.
Gregory, R. L. (1963). Distortion of visual space as inappropriate constancy scaling.Nature,199, 678–680.
Harrington, D. O. (1981).The visual fields: Textbook and atlas of clinical perimetry. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.
Higashiyama, A. (1992). Anisotropic perception of visual angle: Implications for the horizontal-vertical illusion, overconstancy of size, and the moon illusion.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 218–230.
Houcx, R. L., Mefferd, R. B., &Greenstein, G. J. (1972). Influence of a visual frame and vertical-horizontal illusion on shape and size perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology,96, 273–279.
Jones, R. K., &Lee, D. N. (1981). Why two eyes are better than one: The two views of binocular vision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 30–40.
Künnapas, T. M. (1955a). An analysis of the “vertical-horizontal illusion.”Journal of Experimental Psychology,49, 134–140.
Künnapas, T. M. (1955b). Influence of frame size on apparent length of a line.Journal of Experimental Psychology,50, 168–170.
Künnapas, T. M. (1957a). Interocular differences in the vertical—horizontal illusion.Acta Psychologica,13, 253–259.
Künnapas, T. M. (1957b). Vertical-horizontal illusion and the surrounding field.Acta Psychologica,13, 35–42.
Künnapas, T. M. (1957c). The vertical-horizontal illusion and the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology,53, 405–407.
Künnapas, T. M. (1958). Influence of head inclination on the vertical-horizontal illusion.Journal of Psychology,46, 179–185.
Künnapas, T. M. (1959). The vertical-horizontal illusion in artificial visual fields.Journal of Psychology,47, 41–48.
Pearce, D., &Matin, L. (1969). Variation of the magnitude of the horizontal-vertical illusion with retinal eccentricity.Perception & Psychophysics,6, 241–243.
Porac, C. (1989). Is visual illusion decrement based on selective adaptation?Perception & Psychophysics,46, 279–283.
Porac, C., &Coren, S. (1976). The dominant eye.Psychological Bulletin,83, 880–897.
Ritter, S. M. (1917). The vertical-horizontal illusion.Psychological Monographs,23 (4, Whole No. 101).
Rock, I. (1975).An introduction to perception. New York: Macmillan.
Schiffman, H. R., &Thompson, J. G. (1975). The role of figure orientation and apparent depth in the perception of the horizontal-vertical illusion.Perception,4, 79–83.
Thompson, J. G., &Schifeman, H. R. (1974). The effect of the magnitude Of the horizontal-vertical illusion of horizontal retinal eccentricity.Vision Research,14, 1463–1465.
von Collani, G. (1985a). The horizontal-vertical illusion in photographs of concrete scenes with and without depth information.Perceptual & Motor Skills,61, 523–531.
von Collani, G. (1985b). Retinal projection or size constancy as determinants of the horizontal-vertical illusion.Perceptual & Motor Skills,61, 547–557.
Ward, L. M., Porac, C., Coren, S., &Girgus, J. S. (1977). The case for misapplied constancy scaling: Depth associations elicited by illusion configurations.American Journal of Psychology,90, 609–620.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NIMH Grant MH39881 to W.P. We would like to thank Walter Gogel and Irvin Rock for their encouragement.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prinzmetal, W., Gettleman, L. Vertical-horizontal illusion: One eye is better than two. Perception & Psychophysics 53, 81–88 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211717
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211717