Abstract
In two experiments, a concurrent discrimination paradigm was used to study the effects of visual attention on psychophysical judgments and the consistency of these effects with a sample-size model in which attention influences the variance of the internal representation used to make psychophysical judgments. Two pairs of lines were presented simultaneously—one on each side of fixation—and subjects had to indicate for each pair separately whether or not the lines had the same length. Attention was manipulated by instructing subjects to pay 100%, 75%, 50%, 25%, or 0% of their attention to the discrimination on one side, with the complementary amount of attention to the other side. In the first experiment, the relationship between attention and discrimination accuracy was consistent with the sample-size model both when attentional allocation varied from trial to trial and when it varied between blocks, and the relationship held over more widely varying attentional allocations than had previously been studied. In addition, discriminations were more accurate overall with varied than with blocked attentional allocation, suggesting that the two types of allocation do not merely differ in the degree to which attention is focused. The second experiment examined the effects of attentional allocation and stimulus variance, the latter being manipulated by randomly incrementing or decrementing line lengths. These manipulations had additive effects on total Thurstonian variance, and a version of the samplesize model gave an excellent quantitative fit to the obtained results. Besides supporting the samplesize model, the results of Experiment 2 suggest that criterion variance is at least as large as sensory variance and that criterion but not sensory variance increases with stimulus variance.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashby, F. G., &Gott, R. E. (1988). Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 33–53.
Barlow, H. B. (1978). The efficiency of detecting changes of density in random dot patterns.Vision Research,18, 637–650.
Barlow, H. B. (1980). The absolute efficiency of perceptual decisions.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (Series B),290, 71–82.
Bonnel, A. M., Possamai, C. A., &Schmitt, M. (1987). Early modulation of visual input: A study of attentional strategies.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,39A, 757–776.
Braida, L. D., &Durlach, N. I. (1972). Intensity perception: II. Resolution in one-interval paradigms.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,51, 483–502.
Burgess, A., &Barlow, H. B. (1983). The precision of numerosiry üscrimination in arrays of random dots.Vision Research,23, 811–820.
Dickman, S. J., &Meyer, D. E. (1988). Impulsivity and speed-accuracy tradeoffs in information processing.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,54, 274–290.
Dorfman, D. D., &Alf, E., Jr. (1969). Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals: Rating method data.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,6, 487–496.
Downing, C. J. (1988). Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: Effects on perceptual quality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 188–202.
Dudewicz, E. J., &Mishra, S. N. (1988).Modern mathematical statistics. New York: Wiley.
Durlach, N. I., &Braida, L. D. (1969). Intensity perception: I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,46, 372–383.
Egeth, H. [E.], &Blecker, D. [L.] (1971). Differential effects of familiarity on judgments of sameness and difference.Perception & Psychophysics,9(4), 321–326.
Eriksen, C. W., &St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 225–240.
Gravetter, F., &Lockhead, G. R. (1973). Criterial range as a frame of reference for stimulus judgment.Psychological Review,80, 203–216.
Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A. (1966).Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
Hawkins, H. L., Shafto, M. G., &Richardson, K. (1988). Effects of target luminance and cue validity on the latency of visual detection.Perception & Psychophysics,44, 484–492.
Hillyard, S. A., Munte, T. F., &Neville, H. J. (1985). Visualspatial attention, orienting, and brain physiology. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention & performance XI: Mechanisms of attention (pp. 63–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hoffman, J. E., &Nelson, B. (1981). Spatial selectivity in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,30, 283–290.
Hughes, H. C. (1984). Effects of flash luminance and positional expectancies on visual response latency.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 177–184.
Ingleby, J. D. (1968). Decision-making processes in human perception and memory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Jonides, J. (1980). Towards a model of the mind’s eye’s movement.Canadian Journal of Psychology,34, 103–112.
Jonides, J. (1983). Further toward a model of the mind’s eye’s movement.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,21, 247–250.
Kahneman, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kinchla, R. A. (1969).An attention operating characteristic in vision (Tech. Rep. No. 29). McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Department of Psychology.
Kinchla, R. A. (1980). The measurement of attention. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.),Attention and performance VIII (pp. 213–218). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Klein, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search.Nature,334, 430–431.
Kornbrot, D. E. (1980). Attention bands: Some implications for categorical judgments of loudness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 92–104.
Kubovy, M., &Healy, A. F. (1977). The decision rule in probabilistic categorization: What it is and how it is learned.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 427–446.
Lee, W., &Jahnke, M. (1964). Categorizing externally distributed stimulus samples for three continua.Journal of Experimental Psychology,68, 376–382.
Lehmann, E. L. (1986).Testing statistical hypotheses (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Lindsay, P. H., Taylor, M. M., &Forbes, S. M. (1968). Attention and multidimensional discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics,4, 113–117.
Luce, R. D. (1977). Thurstone’s discriminal processes fifty years later.Psychometrika,42, 461–489.
Luce, R. D., &Green, D. M. (1978). Two tests of a neural attention hypothesis for auditory psychophysics.Perception & Psychophysics,23, 363–371.
Luce, R. D., Green, D. M., &Weber, D. L. (1976). Attention bands in absolute identification.Perception & Psychophysics,20, 49–54.
Macmillan, N. A., &Kaplan, H. L. (1985). Detection theory analysis of group data: Estimating sensitivity from average hit and false-alarm rates.Psychological Bulletin,98, 185–199.
Maylor, E. A., &Hockey, R. J. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,11, 777–787
Miller, J [O.] (1991) The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load. A search for boundary conditions.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 270–288,
Moss, S. M., Myers, J. L., &Fjlmore, T. (1970). Short-term recognition memory of tones.Perception & Psychophysics,7, 369–373.
Müller, H. J., &Findlay, J. M. (1987). Sensitivity and criterion effects in the spatial cuing of visual attentionPerception & Psychophysics,42, 383–399.
Navon, D. (1985) Attention division or attention sharing? In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 133–146) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,
Navoy, D., &Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human information processing system.Psychological Review,86, 214–255.
Norman, D. A., &Bobrow, D. G. (1975), On data-limited and resourcelimited processes.Cognitive Psychology,7, 44–64.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1983). Information integration and the identification of stimulus noise and criterial noise in absolute judgmentJournal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception & Performance,9, 299–309.
Posner, M. L. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1984) Components of visual orienting In H. Bouma & D. G. Bowhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., Cohen, Y., Choate, L. S., Hockey, R. J., &Maylor, E. A. (1984). Sustained concentration; Passive filtering or active orienting? In S Kornblum & J. Requin (Eds.),Preparatory states and processes (pp. 49–65), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C., &Davidson, B. (1980). Attention and the detection of signalsJournal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 160–174.
Rosenbrock, H. K., (1960). An automatic method for finding the greatest or least value of a function.Computer Journal,3, 175–184,
Shaw, M. L. (1978). A capacity allocation model for reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,4, 586–598.
Spencer, M. B. H., Lambert, A. J., &Hockey, R. (1988) The inhibitory component of orienting, alertness and sustained attention.Acta Psychologica,69, 165–184.
Sperling, G. (1984). A unified theory of attention and signal detection. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.),Varieties of attention (pp. 103–182). New York: Academic Press
Sperling, G., &Melchner, M. (1973a) The attention operating characteristic: Examples from visual search.Science,202, 315–318.
Sperling, G. &Melchner, M., (1978b). Visual search, visual attention, and the attention operating characteristic. In J. Requm (Ed),Attention and performance VII (pp. 675–686) Hiüsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stevens, S. S., &Galanter, E. H. (1957) Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continuaJournal of Experimental Psychology,54, 377–411.
Swets, J. A., &Birdsall, T. G. (1967). Deferred decision in human signal detection: A preliminary experiment.Perception & Psychophysics,2, 15–24,
Swets, J. A., &Pickett, R. M. (1982).Evaluation of diagnostic systems New York; Academic Press,
Swets, J. A., Shipley, E. F., McKey, M. J., &Green, D. M. (1959). Multiple observations of signals in noise.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,31, 514–521
Taylor, M. M., Lindsay, H., &Forbes, S. M. (1967). Quantification of shared capacity processingm auditory and visual discrimination In A. F. Sanders (Ed),Attention and performance (Vol 1, pp. 223–229). Amsterdam: North-Holland
Teghtsoonian, M., &Teghtsoonian, R. (1971). How repeatableare Stevens’s power law exponents for individual subjects?Perception & Psychophysics,10, 147–149
Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgmentPsychological Review,34, 273–286.
Treisman, M. (1987). Effects of the setting and adjustment of decision criteria on psychophysical performance In E. E. Roskam & R. Suck (Eds.),Progress in mathematical psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 253–297). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Treisman, M., &Faulkner, A. (1985). Can decision criteria interchange locations? Some positive evidenceJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 187–208.
Treisman, M., &Williams, T. C. (1984). A theoty of criterion setting with an application to sequential dependencies.Psychological Review,91, 68–111.
Umiltà, C. (1988). Orienting of attention. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.),Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol 1, pp, 175–193). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Wickelgren, W. A. (1968). Umdimensional strength theory and component analysis of noise in absolute and comparative judgments.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,5, 102–122.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Accepted by previous editor. Charles W. Enksen
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bonnel, AM., Miller, J. Attentional effects on concurrent psychophysical discriminations: Investigations of a sample-size model. Perception & Psychophysics 55, 162–179 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211664
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211664