Abstract
Local descriptions of velocity fields (e.g., rotation, divergence, and deformation) contain a wealth of information for form perception and ego motion. In spite of this, human psychophysical performance in estimating these entities has not yet been thoroughly examined. In this paper, we report on the visual discrimination of rotary motion. A sequence of image frames is used to elicit an apparent rotation of an annulus, composed of dots in the frontoparallel plane, around a fixation spot at the center of the annulus. Differential angular velocity thresholds are measured as a function of the angular velocity, the diameter of the annulus, the number of dots, the display time per frame, and the number of frames. The results show a U-shaped dependence of angular velocity discrimination on spatial scale, with minimal Weber fractions of 7%. Experiments with a scatter in the distance of the individual dots to the center of rotation demonstrate th-at angular velocity cannot be assessed directly; perceived angular velocity depends strongly on the distance of the dots relative to the center of rotation. We suggest that the estimation of rotary motion is mediated by local estimations of linear velocity.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anstis, S. (1986). Recovering motion information from luminance.Vision Research,26, 147–159.
Bell, H. H., &Lappin, J. S. (1979). The detection of rotation in random-dot patterns.Perception & Psychophysics,26, 415–417.
Brandalise, B. B., &Gottsdanker, R. M. (1959). The difference threshold of the magnitude of visual velocity.Journal of Experimental Psychology.57, 83–88.
Campbell, F. W. (1979). Stopped visual motion.Nature,278, 192.
De Bruyn, B., &Orban, G. A. (1988). Human velocity and direction discrimination measured with random dot patterns.Vision Research,28, 1323–1335.
Gibson, J., Olum, P., &Rosenblatt, F. (1958). Parallax and perspective during aircraft landings.American Journal of Psychology,68, 372–385.
Gordon, D. A. (1965). Static and dynamic visual fields in human space perception.Journal of the Optical Society of America,55, 1296–1303.
Helmholtz, H. Von (1925).Treatise on Physiological Optics. (J, P. Southall, Trans.), New York: Dover.
Hoffman, D. D. (1982). Inferring local surface orientation from motion fields.Journal of the Optical Society of America,72, 888–892.
Horn, B. K. P., &Schunck, B. G. (1981). Determining optical flow.Artificial Intelligence,17, 185–203.
Julesz, B., &Hesse, R. I. (1970). Inability to perceive the direction of rotation of line segments.Nature,225, 243–244.
Kaiser.M. K. (1990). Angular velocity discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 149–156.
Koenderink, J. J., &Van Doorn, A. J. (1975). Invariant properties of the motion parallax field due to the movement of rigid bodies relative to an observer.Optica Acta,22, 773–791.
Koenderjnk, J. J., &Van Doorn, A. J. (1976). Local structure of movement parallax of the plane.Journal of the Optical Society of America,66, 717–723.
Koenderink, J. J., &Van Doorn, A. J. (1986). Depth and shape from differential perspective in the presence of bending deformations.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,3, 242–249.
Lappin, J. S., &Bell, H. H. (1976). The detection of coherence in moving random-dot patterns.Vision Research,16, 161–168.
Longuet-Higgens, H., &Prazdny, K. (1980). The interpretation of a moving retinal image.Proceedings of the Royal Society London B,208, 385–397.
Mach, E. (1962). The analysis of sensations. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1886)
Marr, D., &Ullman, S. (1981). Directional selectivity and its use in early visual processing.Proceedings of the Royal Society London B,211, 151–180.
Mckee, S. P. (1981). A local mechanism for differential velocity detection.Vision Research,21, 491–500.
Mckee, S. P., &Welch, L. (1985). Sequential recruitment in the discrimination of velocity.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,2, 243–251.
Moulden, B., &Begg, H. (1986). Some tests of the Marr-Ullmann model of movement detection,Perception,15, 139–155.
Nakayama, K. (1985a). Biological image motion processing: A review.Vision Research,25, 625–660.
Nakayama, K. (1985b). Higher order derivatives of the optical velocity vector field: limitations imposed by biological hardware. In D. Ingle, M. Jeannerod, & D. Lee (Eds.),Brain mechanisms and spatial vision. The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Nakayama, K., &Loomis, J. M. (1974). Optical velocity patterns, velocity-sensitive neurons, and space perception: A hypothesis.Perception,3, 63–80.
Orban, G. A., Van Calenbergh, F., De Bruyn, B., &Maes, H. (1985). Velocity discrimination in central and peripheral visual field.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,2, 1836–1847.
Regan, D. (1986). Visual processing of four kinds of relative motion.Vision Research,26, 127–145.
Regan, D., &Beverley, K. I. (1985). Visual responses to vorticity and the neural analysis of optic flow.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,2, 280–283.
Reichardt, W. (1987). Evaluation of optical motion information by movement detectors.Journal of Comparative Physiology A,161, 533–547.
Rieger, J. H. (1983). Information in optical flows induced by curved paths of observation.Journal of the Optical Society of America,73, 339–344.
Riemersma, J. B. J. (1981). Visual control during straight road driving.Acta Psychologica,48, 215–225.
Rogers, B., &Graham, M. (1979). Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception.Perception,8, 125–134.
Saito, H., Yukie, M., Tanaka, K., Hikosaka, K., Fukada, Y., &Iwai, E. (1986). Integration of direction signals of image motion in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey.Journal of Neuroscience,6, 145–157.
Tanaka, K., Fukada, Y., &Saito, H. (1989). Underlying mechanisms of the responser specificity of expansion/contraction and rotation cells in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the Macaque monkey.Journal of Neurophysiology,62, 642–656.
Tanaka, K., &Saito, H. (1989). Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the Macaque monkey.Journal of Neurophysiology,62, 626–641.
Van Doorn, A. J., &Koenderink, J. J. (1982a), Temporal properties of the visual detectability of moving spatial white noise.Experimental Brain Research,45, 179–188.
Van Doorn, A. J., &Koenderink, J. J. (1982b). Spatial properties ofthe visual detectability of moving spatial white noise.Experimental Brain Research,45, 189–195.
Van Doorn, A. J., &Koenderink, J. J. (1982c). Visibility of movement gradients.Biological Cybernetics,44, 167–175.
Van Santen, J. P. H., &Sperling, G. (1985). Elaborated Reichardt Detectors.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,2. 300–321.
Walker, J. T. (1975). Visual texture as a factor in the apparent velocity of objective motion and motion aftereffects.Perception & Psychophysics,18, 175–180.
Warren, W. H., Jr.,Morris, M. W., &Kalish, M. (1988). Perception of translational heading from optical flow.Journal of Erperimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 646–660.
waxman, A. M., Kamar-Parsi, B, & Subbarao, M. (1987). Closed-form solutions to image flow equations. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 12-24). London.
Werkhoven, P., & Koenderink, J. J. (1989).Reversed rotary motion perception. Unpublished manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by US Air Force Office of Scientific Research Grant 87-0380 and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). The preparation of this manuscript was partially supported by USAF Life Science Directorate Visual Information Processing Grant 88-0140.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Werkhoven, P., Koenderink, J.J. Visual processing of rotary motion. Perception & Psychophysics 49, 73–82 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211618
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211618