Abstract
Converging experimental operations and several prospective memory tasks were used across three experiments to determine the extent to which prospective remembering is supported by datadriven versus conceptually driven processes. In all experiments, subjects were asked to perform an action when a target item later occurred. When the semantic context changed from encoding to test, prospective memory significantly declined (Experiment 1). When the target event (the item, which in its subsequent appearance in the experiment was the signal to perform the action) was presented as a word (relative to picture presentation, Experiment 2) or was encoded nonsemantically (relative to semantic encoding, Experiment 3), there was a decline in prospective memory performance. Dividing attention during prospective memory retrieval substantially reduced prospective memory performance (Experiment 3). The results of this research indicated that prospective memory is largely conceptually driven, and it behaves more similarly to direct rather than indirect conceptual tests. We suggest that prospective remembering of the type studied here is mediated by a reflexive episodic associative memory system as proposed by Moscovitch (1994).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R., &Reder, L. M. (1979). An elaborative processing explanation of depth of processing. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 385–404). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,80 (No. 3, Pt. 2).
Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer appropriate processing framework.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 657–668.
Blaxton, T. A. (1992). Dissociations among memory measures in memory-impaired subjects: Evidence for a processing account of memory.Memory & Cognition,20, 549–562.
Brandimonte, M., Einstein, G. O., &McDaniel, M. A. (Eds.) (1996).Prospective memory: Theory and applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brown, A. S., Neblett, D. R., Jones, T. C., &Mitchell, D. B. (1991). Transfer of processing in repetition priming: Some inappropriate findings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 514–525.
Challis, B. H., &Brodbeck, D. R. (1992). Level of processing affects priming in word fragment completion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 595–607.
Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., &Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval in human memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 159–180.
Donaldson, W. (1992). Measuring recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 275–277.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1964).Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (H. A. Ruger & C. E. Bussenius, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1885; translated 1913).
Eich, E. (1985). Context, memory, and integrated item/context imagery.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 764–770.
Einstein, G. O., Holland, L. J., McDaniel, M. A., &Guynn, M. J. (1992). Age related deficits in prospective memory: The influence of task complexity.Psychology & Aging,7, 471–478.
Einstein, G. O., &McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,6, 717–726.
Einstein, G. O., &McDaniel, M. A. (1996). Retrieval processes in prospective memory: Theoretical approaches and some new empirical findings. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.),Prospective memory: Theory & applications (pp. 115–142). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Richardson, S. L., Guynn, M. J., &Cunfer, A. R. (1995). Aging and prospective memory: Examining the influences of self-initiated retrieval processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 996–1007.
Gick, M. L., Craik, F. I. M., &Morris, R. G. (1988). Task complexity and age differences in working memory.Memory & Cognition,16, 353–361.
Godden, D. R., &Baddeley, A. D. (1980). When does context influence recognition memory?British Journal of Psychology,71, 99–104.
Goldstein, E., Schmitt, J. C., &Sheirer, C. J. (1978). Semantic effects in encoding specificity: A levels of processing approach.Memory & Cognition,6, 13–19.
Guynn, M. J., McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (in press). Remembering to perform actions: A different type of remembering? In H. D. Zimmer & R. L. Cohen (Eds.),Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic remembering? New York: Oxford University Press.
Hamann, S. B., &Squire, L. R. (1996). Level-of-processing effects in word-completion priming: A neuropsychological study.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 933–947.
Hunt, R. R., &Ellis, H. C. (1974). Recognition memory and degree of semantic contextual change.Journal of Experimental Psychology,103, 1153–1159.
Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 485–508.
Jacoby, L. L. (1984). Incidental versus intentional retrieval: Remembering and awareness as separate issues. In N. Butters & L. Squire (Eds.),The neuropsychology of memory (pp. 97–122). New York: Guilford.
Jacoby, L. L., Woloshyn, B., &Kelley, C. M. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 115–125.
Light, L. L., &Carter-Sobell, L. (1970). Effects of changed semantic context on recognition memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,9, 1–11.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgement of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.
Masson, M. E. J., &Freedman, L. (1990). Fluent identification of repeated words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 355–373.
Masson, M. E. J., &MacLeod, C. M. (1992). Re-enacting the route to interpretation: Enhanced perceptual identification without prior perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 145–176.
Matthews, T. D. (1992).Are retrospective and prospective memory related? Unpublished master’s thesis, University of North Carolina, Greensboro.
McDaniel, M. A. (1995). Prospective memory: Progress and processes. In D. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 33, pp. 191–221). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
McDaniel, M. A., Anderson, D. C., Einstein, G. O., &O’Halloran, C. M. (1989). Modulation of environmental reinstatement effects through encoding strategies.American Journal of Psychology,102, 523–548.
McDaniel, M. A., &Einstein, G. O. (1993). The importance of cue familiarity and cue distinctiveness in prospective memory.Memory,1, 23–41.
McDaniel, M. A., Friedman, A., &Bourne, L. E. (1978). Remembering the levels of information in words.Memory & Cognition,6, 156–164.
McDermott, K. B., &Roediger, H. L., III (1996). Exact and conceptual repetition dissociate conceptual memory tests: Problems for transfer appropriate processing theory.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,50, 57–71.
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. P., &Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 519–533.
Moscovitch, M. (1994). Memory and working with memory: Evaluation of a component process model and comparisons with other models. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.),Memory systems 1994 (pp. 269–310). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nelson, D. L. (1979). Remembering pictures and words: Appearance, significance, and name. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 45–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Paivio, A. (1971).Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Oxford University Press.
Paivio, A., &Csapo, K. (1973). Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding?Cognitive Psychology,5, 176–206.
Robinson, M. B. (1992).Contextual effects in prospective memory. Unpublished master’s thesis, Purdue University.
Robinson-Riegler, M. B. (1994).The recognition-recall hypothesis of prospective memory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.
Roediger, H. L., III, &Blaxton, T. A. (1987). Retrieval modes produce dissociations in memory for surface information. In D. Gorfein & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.),Memory and cognitive processes: The Ebbinghaus Centennial Conference (pp. 349–379). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Roediger, H. L., III,Weldon, M. S., &Challis, B. H. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 3–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Roediger, H. L., III,Weldon, M. S., Stadler, M. L., &Riegler, G. L. (1992). Direct comparison of two implicit memory tests: Word fragment and word stem completion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1251–1269.
Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,6, 156–163.
Smith, M. C., &Magee, L. E. (1980). Tracing the time course of picture-word processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 373–392.
Smith, S. M. (1988). Environmental context-dependent memory. In G. M. Davies & D. M. Thomson (Eds.),Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 13–33). New York: Wiley.
Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A., &Bjork, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory.Memory & Cognition,6, 342–353.
Toglia, M. P., &Battig, W. F. (1978).Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tulving, E. (1983).Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weldon, M. S. (1991). Mechanisms underlying priming on perceptual tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 526–541.
Weldon, M. S., &Coyote, K. C. (1996). Failure to find the picture superiority effect in implicit conceptual memory tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 670–686.
Weldon, M. S., &Roediger, H. L., III (1987). Altering retrieval demands reverses the picture superiority effect.Memory & Cognition,15, 269–280.
Weldon, M. S., Roediger, H. L., III, &Challis, B. H. (1989). The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect.Memory & Cognition,17, 95–105.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by National Institute on Aging Grant AG08436 and by a Purdue Research Foundation Grant. Experiments 1 and 2 were conducted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for B.R.-R.’s master’s degree at Purdue University. The experiments herein were partially described in chapters in edited volumes (Einstein & McDaniel, 1996; McDaniel, 1995).
—Accepted by previous editor, Geoffrey R. Loftus
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McDaniel, M.A., Robinson-Riegler, B. & Einstein, G.O. Prospective remembering: Perceptually driven or conceptually driven processes?. Memory & Cognition 26, 121–134 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211375
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211375