Abstract
Two experiments examined the RT to visual stimuli presented alone and when either auditory (Experiment 1) or kinesthetic (Experiment 2) stimuli followed the visual event by 50 or 65 msec, respectively. As has been found before, the RT to combined stimulus events was 20 to 40 msec shorter than to visual events alone. While such results have generally been interpreted to mean that two sensory modalities are interacting, Raab’s (1962) hypothesis of statistical facilitation— that the subject responds to that stimulus modality whose processing is completed first—is also possible. Using Raab’s model, but with relaxed assumptions, the present experiments show that RT to combined stimulus events is more rapid than can be accounted for by statistical facilitation. Therefore, some intersensory interaction was probably occurring. The nature of these possible interactions and the status of the statistical-facilitation hypothesis are discussed. Supported in part by Grant BNS 80–23125 from the National Science Foundation to the second author.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference Notes
Erkelens, C. Unpublished data,Faculty of Dentistry, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, 1981.
Schmidt, R. A., Gielen, S. C. A. M., & van den Heuvel, P. J. M.On the locus of intersensory facilitation of reaction time. Manuscript submitted for publication May 1983.
Gielen, S. C. A. M., Schmidt, R. A., & van den Heuvel, P. J. M. Unpublished experiments, Department of Physiological and Medical Physics, Rijksuniversiteit, Utrecht, 1981.
References
Bernstein, I. H., Clark, M. H., &Edelstein, B. A. Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time.Journal of ExperimentalPsychology, 1969,80, 567–569. (a)
Bernstein, I. H., Clark, M. H., &Edelstein, B. A. Intermodal effects in choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,81, 405–407. (b)
Bernstein, I. H., &Edelstein, B. A. Effects of some variations in auditory input upon visual choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,87, 241–247.
Chernikoff, R., &Taylor, F. V. Reaction time to kinesthetic stimulation resulting from sudden arm displacement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1952,43, 1–8.
Gurfinkel, V. S., &Pal’tsev, Y. I. Effect of the state of the spinal cord on the execution of a simple motor reaction.Biophysics, 1965,10, 944–951.
Hershesson, M. Reaction time as a measure of intersensory facilitation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962,63, 289–293.
Michie, P. T., Clarke, A. M., Sinden, J. D., &Glue, L. C. T. Reaction time and spinal excitability in a simple reaction time task.Physiology & Behavior, 1976,16, 311–315.
Morrell, L. Intersensory facilitation of reaction time.Psychonomic Science, 1967,8, 77–78.
Morrell, L. K. Cross-modality effects upon choice reaction time.Psychonomic Science, 1968,11, 129–130. (a)
Morrell, L. K. Temporal characteristics of sensory integration in choice reaction times.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,77, 14–18. (b)
Nickerson, R. S. Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: Energy summation or preparation enhancement?Psychological Review, 1973,80, 489–509.
Posner, M. I.Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, N.J: Wiley, 1978.
Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., &Klein, R. Visual dominance. An information-processing account of its origins and significance.Psychological Review, 1976,83, 157–171.
Raab, D. H. Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times.Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1962,24, 574–590.
Schmidt, R. A.Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics Press, 1982.
Schneider, W., &Fiske, A. D. Attention theory and mechanisms for skilled performance. In R. A. Magill (Ed.),Memory and control of motor behavior. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1982.
Schneider, W., &Shiffrin, R. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review, 1977,84, 1–66.
Semjen, A., Bonnet, M., &Requin, J. Relationship between the time-course of Hoffman reflexes and the foreperiod duration in a reaction-time task.Physiology & Behavior, 1973,10, 1041–1050.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Schneider, W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: 11. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Psychological Review, 1977,84, 127–190.
Simon, J. R., &Craft, J. L. Effects of an irrelevant auditory stimulus on visual choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,86, 272–274.
Todd, J. W. Reaction time to multiple stimuli.Archives of Psychology, 1912,3, 1–65.
Wadman, W. J., Boerhout, W., &Denier Van Den Gon, J. J. Responses of the arm movement control system to force impulses.Journal of Human Movement Studies, 1980,6, 280–302.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gielen, S.C.A.M., Schmidt, R.A. & Van Den Heuvel, P.J.M. On the nature of intersensory facilitation of reaction time. Perception & Psychophysics 34, 161–168 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211343
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211343