Abstract
An experiment was conducted to investigate the relative contributions of syntactic form and content to conditional reasoning. The content domain chosen was that of causation. Conditional statements that described causal relationships (if 〈cause〉, then (〈effect〉) were embedded in simple arguments whose entailments are governed by the rules -of truth-functional logic (i.e.,modus ponens, modus tollens, denying the antecedent, andaffirming the consequent). The causal statements differed in terms of the number of alternative causes and disabling conditions that characterized the causal relationship. (A disabling condition is an event that prevents an effect from occurring even though a relevant cause is present.) Subjects were required to judge whether or not each argument’s conclusion could be accepted. Judgments were found to vary systematically with the number of alternative causes and disabling conditions. Conclusions of arguments based on conditionals with few alternative causes or disabling conditions were found to be more accept-able than conclusions based on those with many.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bassok, M. (1990). Transfer of domain-specific problem-solving procedures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 522–533.
Bassok, M., &Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Interdomain transfer between isomorphic topics in algebra and physics.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 153–166.
Braine, M. D. S. (1978). On the relation between the natural logic of reasoning and standard logic.Psychological Review,85, 1–21.
Braine, M. D. S., Reiser, B. J., &Rumain, B. (1984). Some empirical justification for a theory of natural propositional logic. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 18, pp. 313–371). New York: Academic Press.
Byrne, R. M. J. (1989). Suppressing valid inferences with conditionals.Cognition,31, 61–83.
Cheng, P. W., &Holyoaic, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas.Cognitive Psychology,17, 391–416.
Cheng, P. W., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., &Oliver, L. M. (1986). Pragmatic vs. syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning.Cognitive Psychology,18, 293–328.
Cheng, P. W., &Novick, L. (1990). A probabilistic contrast model of causal induction.Journal of Personality& Social Psychology,58, 545–567.
Chi, M. T., Feltovich, P. J., &Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices.Cognitive Science,5, 121–152.
Evans, J. St. B. T. (1982).The psychology of deductive reasoning. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Evans, J. ST. B. T. (1989).Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Hove and London, U.K.: Erlbaum.
Evans, J. ST. B. T., Barston, J. L., &Pollard, P. (1983). On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning.Memory & Cognition,11, 295–306.
Fillenbaum, S. (1975). If: Some uses.Psychological Research,37, 245–260.
Fillenbaum, S. (1976). Inducements: On phrasing and logic of conditional promises, threats, and warnings.Psychological Research,38, 231–250.
Fillenbaum, S. (1978). How to do somethings with IF. In J. W. Cotton & R. L. Klatzky (Eds.),Semantic factors in cognition (pp. 169–214). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Geis, M., &Zwicky, A. M. (1971). On invited inferences.Linguistic Inquiry,2, 561–566.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.),Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Griggs, R. A., &Cox, J. R. (1982). The elusive thematic-materials effect Wason’s selection task.British Journal of Psychology,73, 407–420.
Henle, M. (1962). On the relation between logic and thinking.Psychological Review,69, 366–378.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D., &Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives.Psychological Review,93, 136–153.
Kelley, H. H. (1972). Causal schemata and the attribution process. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.),Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 1–26). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution.American Psychologist,78, 107–128.
Keppel, G. (1973). Design and analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Larkin, J. (1981).The role of problem representation in physics (Tech. Rep. No. CIP-429). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie-Mellon University, Department of Psychology.
Larkin, J., Mcdermott, J., Simon, D. P., &Simon, H. A. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems.Science,208, 1335–1342.
Manktelow, K. I., &Evans, J. St. B. T. (1979). Facilitation of reasoning by realism: Effect or non-effect?British Journal of Psychology,70, 477–488.
Marcus, S. L., &Rips, L. J. (1979). Conditional reasoning.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 199–233.
Markovits, H. (1986). Familiarity effects in conditional reasoning.Journal of Educational Psychology,78, 492–494.
Medin, D. L. (1983). Structural principles in categorization. In T. J. Tighe & B. E. Shepp (Eds.),Perception, cognition, and development: Interactional analyses (pp. 203–230). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Medin, D. L., Altom, M. W., Edelson, S. M., &Freko, D. (1982). Correlated symptoms and simulated medical classification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 37–50.
Medin, D. L., &Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning.Psychological Review,85, 207–238.
Novick, L. R. (1990, April).The influence of problem structure and world knowledge on causal inference. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association, Tucson.
Reich, S. S., &Ruth, P. (1982). Wason’s card selection task: Verification, falsification, and matching.British Journal of Psychology,73, 395–405.
Revlin, R., Leirer, V., Yopp, H., &Yopp, R. (1980). The belief-bias effect in formnal reasoning: The influence of knowledge on logic.Memory & Cognition,8, 584–592.
Rips, L. J. (1983). Cognitive processes in propositional reasoning.Psychological Review,90, 38–71.
Rumain, B., Connell, J., &Braine, M. D. S. (1983). Conversational comprehension processes are responsible for reasoning fallacies in children as well as adults: IF is not the biconditional.Developmental Psychology,19, 471–481.
Wason, P. C., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972).Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wilkins, M. C. (1928). The effect of changed material on the ability to do formal syllogistic reasoning.Archives of Psychology (No. 102).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cummins, D.D., Lubart, T., Alksnis, O. et al. Conditional reasoning and causation. Memory & Cognition 19, 274–282 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211151
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211151