Skip to main content
Log in

From a passing thought to a false memory in 2 minutes: Confusing real and illusory events

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The frequency with which subjects erroneously included a nonpresented word in their recall of a study list was explored in two experiments. The intrusion error was recalled by as many as 80% of the subjects, and when it was perceived to have been presented early in the study list, it was assigned confidence ratings and phenomenological retrieval characteristics equivalent to those for presented words. As a result, subjects were often unable to discriminate memories of real study words from their memories of a related but nonpresented word. Manipulations of encoding, but not of retrieval, conditions altered both the frequencies of illusory memories and their metamemorial characteristics. The results and paradigm are discussed in terms of their relevance to the “memory-recovery” debate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Alba, J. W., &Hasher, L. (1983). Is memory schematic?Psychological Bulletin,93, 203–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, B.,Morton, J.,Bekerian, D. A.,Brewin, C. R.,Davies, G. D., &Mollon, P. (1995, May). The recovery of memories in clinical practice: Experiences and beliefs of British Psychological Society practitioners.The Psychologist, 209–214.

  • Appleby, D. (1987). Producing a déj vu experience. In V. P. Makosky, L. G. Whittemore, & A. M. Rogers (Eds.),Activities handbook for the teaching of psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 78–79). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, E., &Davis, L. (1988).The courage to heal: A guide for women survivors of childhood sexual abuse. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousfield, W. A. (1953). The occurrence of clustering in the recall of randomly arranged associates.Journal of General Psychology,49, 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deese, J. (1959a). Influence of inter-item associative strength upon immediate free recall.Psychological Reports,5, 305–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deese, J. (1959b). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson, R. (1992).Repressed memories: A journey to recovery from sexual abuse. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, J. M., Gawlik, B., &Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1994). Maintenance rehearsal affects knowing, not remembering; elaborative rehearsal affects remembering, not knowing.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 107–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., &Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring.Psychological Review,88, 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., &Suengas, A. G. (1987). Reality monitoring judgments of other people’s memories.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,27, 107–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W., &Buschke, H. (1969). Homophones and synonyms in short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,80, 403–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, D. S., &Read, J. D. (1994). Psychotherapy and memories of child sexual abuse: A cognitive perspective.Applied Cognitive Psychology,8, 281–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, D. S., &Read, J. D. (1995). “Memory work” and recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse: Scientific evidence and public, professional, and personal issues.Psychology, Public Policy & Law,1, 846–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E. F. (1993). The reality of repressed memories.American Psychologist,48, 518–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, D. A., Lindsay, D. S., Memon, A., &Bull, R. (1995). Psychotherapy and the recovery of memories of childhood sexual abuse: U.S. and British practitioners’ beliefs, practices, and experiences.Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology,63, 426–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, J. D., &Lindsay, D. S. (1994). Moving toward a middle ground on the “false memory debate”: Reply to commentaries on Lindsay and Read.Applied Cognitive Psychology,8, 407–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. R., &Romig, C. A. (1990). Memory retrieval in treating adult survivors of sexual abuse.American Journal of Family Therapy,18, 246–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, B. J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology,70, 122–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Don Read.

Additional information

Funding from the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Alberta Law Foundation supported this research. The author thanks Eileen McFadzen and Tonia Nicholls for assistance in data analysis and Professors G. Prusky, L. Chew, and L. Delude for access to their classes. Constructive comments from John Vokey, Steve Lindsay, and Henry L. Roediger III greatly improved an earlier draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Read, J.D. From a passing thought to a false memory in 2 minutes: Confusing real and illusory events. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3, 105–111 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210749

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210749

Keywords

Navigation