Abstract
Confidence and accuracy, while often considered to tap the same memory representation, are often found to be only weakly correlated (e.g., Bothwell, Deffenbacher, & Brigham, 1987; Deffenbacher, 1980). There are at least two possible (nonexclusive) reasons for this weak relation. First, it may be simply due to noise of one sort or another; that is, it may come about because of both within- and between-subjects statistical variations that are partially uncorrelated for confidence measures on the one hand and accuracy measures on the other. Second, confidence and accuracy may be uncorrelated because they are based, at least in part, on different memory representations that are affected in different ways by different independent variables. We propose a general theory that is designed to encompass both of these possibilities and, within the context of this theory, we evaluate effects of four variables—degree of rehearsal, study duration, study luminance, and test luminance—in three face recognition experiments. In conjunction with our theory, the results allow us to begin to identify the circumstances under which confidence and accuracy are based on the same versus different sources of information in memory. The results demonstrate the conditions under which subjects are quite poor at monitoring their memory performance, and are used to extend cue utilization theories to the domain of face recognition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bamber, D. (1979). State-trace analysis: A method of testing simple theories of causation.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,19, 137–181.
Begg, I., Duft, S., Lalonde, P., Melnick, R., &Sanvito, J. (1989). Memory predictions are based on ease of processing.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 610–632.
Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., &Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 55–68.
Bogartz, R. S. (1976). On the meaning of statistical interactions.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,22, 178–183.
Bothwell, R., Deffenbacher, K., &Brigham, J. (1987). Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited.Journal of Applied Psychology,72, 691–695.
Burke, D. M., MacKay, D. G., Worthley, J. S., &Wade, E. (1991). On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and old adults?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,6, 325–337.
Chandler, C. C. (1994). Studying related pictures can reduce accuracy, but increase confidence, in a modified recognition test.Memory & Cognition,22, 273–280.
Clark, S. E. (1997). A familiarity-based account of confidence-accuracy inversions in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 232–238.
Cutler, B., &Penrod, S., &Stuve, T. (1988). Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases.Law & Human Behavior,12, 41–55.
Deffenbacher, K. (1980). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Can we infer anything about their relation?Law & Human Behavior,4, 243–260.
Dobbins, I. G., Kroll, N. E. A., &Liu, Q. (1998). Confidence-accuracy inversions in scene recognition: A remember-know analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1306–1315.
Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., &Kleinbölting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence.Psychological Review,98, 506–528.
Glanzer, M., &Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,13, 8–20.
Glanzer, M., &Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Theory and data.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 5–16.
Hart, J. T. (1967). Memory and the memory-monitoring process.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,6, 685–691.
Hintzman, D. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,93, 411–428.
Jameson, K. A., Narens, L., Goldfarb, K., &Nelson, T. O. (1990). The influence of near-threshold priming on metamemory and recall.Acta Psychologica,73, 55–68.
Kelemen, W. L., &Weaver, C. A., III (1997). Enhanced metamemory at delays: Why do judgments of learning improve over time?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1394–1409.
Kelley, C. M., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Remembering mistaken for knowing: Ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 1–24.
King, J. F., Zechmeister, E. G., &Shaughnessy, J. J. (1980). Judgments of knowing: The influence of retrieval practice.American Journal of Psychology,95, 329–343.
Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know what we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing.Psychological Review,100, 609–639.
Koriat, A. (1995). Dissociating knowing and the feeling of knowing: Further evidence for the accessibility model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 311–333.
Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 349–370.
Leonesio, R. J., &Nelson, T. O. (1990). Do different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 464–470.
Lindsay, D. S., Read, J. D., &Sharma, K. (1998). Accuracy and confidence in person identification: The relationship is strong when witnessing conditions vary widely.Psychological Science,9, 215–218.
Lindsay, R. C. L., Wells, G., &Rumpel, C. M. (1981). Can people detect eyewitness-identification accuracy within and across situations?Journal of Applied Psychology,66, 79–89.
Loftus, G. R. (1978). On interpretation of interactions.Memory & Cognition,6, 312–319.
Loftus, G. R., &Irwin, D. E. (1998). On the relations among different measures of visible and informational persistence.Cognitive Psychology,35, 135–199.
Loftus, G. R., &Ruthruff, E. R. (1994). A theory of visual information acquisition and visual memory with special application to intensityduration tradeoffs.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 33–50.
Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., &Joaquim, S. G. (1993). The cue familiarity heuristic in metacognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 851–861.
Neil v.Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 93, S. Ct. 375; 34 L. Ed. 2d 401 (1972).
Nelson, T. O., &Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people’s judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The “delayed JOL effect.”Psychological Science,2, 267–270.
Pelli, D. G., &Zhang, L. (1991). Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays.Vision Research,31, 1337–1350.
Read, J. D., Lindsay, D. S., &Nicholls, T. (1998). The relationship between confidence and accuracy in eyewitness identification studies: Is the conclusion changing? In C. P. Thompson, D. J. Herrmann, J. D. Read, D. Bruce, D. G. Payne, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.),Eyewitness memory: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 107–130). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Reder, L. M., &Ritter, F. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 435–451.
Schwartz, B. L. (1994). Sources of information in metamemory: Judgments of learning and feelings of knowing.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 357–375.
Schwartz, B. L., &Metcalfe, J. (1992). Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling-of-knowing judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1074–1083.
Sommer, W., Heinz, A., Leuthold, H., Matt, J., &Schweinberger, S. R. (1995). Metamemory, distinctiveness, and event-related potentials in recognition memory for faces.Memory & Cognition,23, 1–11.
Spellman, B. A., &Bjork, R.A. (1992). When predictions create reality: Judgments of learning may alter what they are intended to assess.Psychological Science,3, 315–316.
Stretch, V., &Wixted, J. T. (1998a). Decision rules for recognition memory confidence judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1397–1410.
Stretch, V., &Wixted, J. T. (1998b). On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1379–1396.
Thiede, K. W., &Dunlosky, J. (1994). Delaying students’ metacognitive monitoring improves their accuracy in predicting their recognition performance.Journal of Educational Psychology,86, 290–302.
Tulving, E. (1981). Similarity relations in recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 479–496.
Tulving, E., &Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review,80, 352–373.
Vesonder, G. T., &Voss, J. F. (1985). On the ability to predict one’s own responses while learning.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 363–376.
Weaver, C. A., III, &Kelemen, W. L. (1997). Shifts in response patterns or increased metamemory accuracy?Psychological Science,8, 318–321.
Wells, G. L., Ferguson, T. J., &Lindsay, R. C. L. (1981). The tractability of eyewitness confidence and its implications for triers of fact.Journal of Applied Psychology,66, 688–696.
Wells, G. L., Lindsay, R. C. L., &Ferguson, T. J. (1979). Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification.Journal of Applied Psychology,64, 440–448.
Wixted, J. T. (1992). Subjective memorability and the mirror effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 681–690.
Yonelinas, A. P., Kroll, N. E., Dobbins, I., Lazzara, M., &Knight, R. T. (1998) Recollection and familiarity deficits in amnesia: Convergence of remember-know, process dissociation, and receiver operating characteristic data.Neuropsychology,12, 323–339.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The research reported in this article was supported in part by an NIMH grant to T.A.B. and an NIMH grant to G.R.L. We thank John Wixted and Stephan Lindsay for their helpful suggestions during the review process. Thanks also to John Dunlosky for many helpful discussions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Busey, T.A., Tunnicliff, J., Loftus, G.R. et al. Accounts of the confidence-accuracy relation in recognition memory. Psychon Bull Rev 7, 26–48 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210724
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210724