Abstract
Simon, Acosta, and Mewaldt (1975) reported an experiment in which a 200-Hz warning-tone, presented in the left or right ear, was followed by an imperative stimulus of 500 Hz in either ear, to which a left- or right-key press was to be made. Simon et al. found a correspondence effect for warning location and response location (i.e., faster reactions when warning and response locations corresponded than when they did not) when the stimulus-response mapping was incompatible but not when it was compatible. These findings stand in contrast to typical results of (1) a correspondence effect for irrelevant location information when the mapping is compatible and (2) a reversed correspondence effect (i.e., faster responses when stimulus and response location do not correspond) when the mapping is incompatible. We conducted a direct replication of Simon et al.’s experiment and another experiment that differed only in the imperative stimulus being visual, in order to determine whether there are unique aspects of their method that yield atypical results. Our results failed to replicate those reported by Simon et al. but instead showed the patterns of correspondence effects typically found with other procedures, suggesting that the warning-signal method produces irrelevant-location effects consistent with those produced by other methods.
Article PDF
References
Arend, U., &Wandmacher, J. (1987). On the generality of logical recoding in spatial inference tasks.Acta Psychologica,65, 193–210.
De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., &Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 731–750.
Eimer, M. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 837–854.
Glaser, M. O., &Glaser, W. R. (1982). Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 875–894.
Hasbroucq, T., &Guiard, Y. (1991). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward a conceptual clarification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 246–266.
Hedge, A., &Marsh, N. W. A. (1975). The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response time.Acta Psychologica,39, 427–439.
Hommel, B., &Prinz, W. (Eds.) (1997).Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Lu, C.-H. (1997). Correspondence effects for irrelevant information in choice-reaction tasks: Characterizing the S-R relations and the processing dynamics. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.),Theoretical issues in S-R compatibility (pp. 85–117). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Lu, C.-H., &Proctor, R. W. (1994). Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 286–298.
Lu, C.-H., &Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 174–207.
Ragot, R., &Fiori, N. (1994). Mental processing during reactions toward and away from a stimulus: An ERP analysis of auditory congruence and S-R compatibility.Psychophysiology,31, 439–446.
Ragot, R., &Guiard, Y. (1992). Stimulus congruence and stimulus-response compatibility: Two variables disentangled in an auditory RT task.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,4, 219–232.
Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.),Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31–86). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Simon, J. R., Acosta, E., Jr., &Mewaldt, S. P. (1975). Effect of locus of warning tone on auditory choice reaction time.Memory & Cognition,3, 167–170.
Simon, J. R., &Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant location cue on information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology,51, 300–304.
Simon, J. R., Sly, P. E., &Vilapakkam, S. (1981). Effect of compatibility of S-R mapping on reaction toward the stimulus source.Acta Psychologica,47, 63–81.
Stoffels, E. J., van der Molen, M. W., &Keuss, P. J. G. (1989). An additive factors analysis of the effects of location cues associated with auditory stimuli on stages of information processing.Acta Psychologica,70, 161–197.
Sugg, M. J., &McDonald, J. E. (1994). Time course of inhibition in color-response and word-response versions of the Stroop task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 647–675.
Umiltà, C., &Nicoletti, R. (1990). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R.W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.),Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 89–116). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Wang, H., &Proctor, R. W. (1996). Stimulus-response compatibility as a function of stimulus code and response modality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1201–1217.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors would like to thank Amanda Foster, Marland Pittman, Brian Turner, and Jim Whanger for the assistance in conducting these experiments and Bernhard Hommel, Raymond Klein, and Steven Mewaldt for their comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Proctor, R.W., Pick, D.F. Lateralized warning tones produce typical irrelevant-location effects on choice reactions. Psychon Bull Rev 5, 124–129 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209467
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209467