Abstract
Two experiments examined the role of necessity and sufficiency relationships in conditional reasoning. The results indicated that perceived necessity and sufficiency predicted variability in reasoning performance for four pragmatic relations (permission, obligation, causation, and definition), for both determinant and indeterminant syntactic forms, and for both a conditional arguments and a truth table evaluation task, as well as when the temporal relationship between the antecedent and consequent events was reversed. These data support the general utility of perceived necessity and sufficiency in the interpretation and evaluation of conditional relationships. However, the effects of necessity and sufficiency were smaller for reversed than for forward statements, which suggests that necessity/sufficiency-based interpretations may be more useful for evaluating some types of conditional relations than others. In addition, people were more likely to accept valid rather than invalid arguments, regardless of necessity/sufficiency relations, a finding that suggests that abstract, content-free representations may play a functional role in conditional reasoning.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bindra, D., Clarke, K. A., &Schultz, T. R. (1980). Understanding predictive relations of necessity and sufficiency in formally equivalent “causal” and “logical” problems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 422–443.
Braine, M. D. S., &O’Brien, D. P. (1991). A theory of If: A lexical entry, reasoning program, and pragmatic principles.Psychological Review,98, 182–203.
Bucci, W. (1978). The interpretation of universal affirmative propositions.Cognition,6, 55–77.
Byrne, R. M. J. (1989). Suppressing valid inferences with conditionals.Cognition,31, 61–83.
Cheng, P. W., &Holyoak, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas.Cognitive Psychology,17, 391–416.
Cheng, P. W., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., &Oliver, L. M. (1986). Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning.Cognitive Psychology,18, 293–328.
Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how we reason? Studies with the Wason selection task.Cognition,31, 187–276.
Cummins, D. D., Lubart, T., Alksnis, O., &Rist, R. (1991). Conditional reasoning and causation.Memory & Cognition,19, 274–282.
Digdon, N. L. (1986).Conditional and biconditional interpretations of if-then sentences: The role of content and context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario.
Evans, J. St. B. T. (1982).The psychology of deductive reasoning. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Evans, J. St. B. T. (1983). Linguistic determinants of bias in conditional reasoning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,35A, 635- 644.
Evans, J. St. B. T., Barston, J. L., &Pollard, P. (1983). On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning.Memory & Cognition,11, 295–306.
Fillenbaum, S. (1986). The use of conditionals in deterrents and inducements. In E. C. Traugott, A. T. Meullen, J. S. Reilly, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.),On conditionals (pp. 179–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fillmore, C. J. (1987). Varieties of conditional sentences. InProceedings of the 3rd Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (pp. 163–182). Columbus: Ohio State University.
Gibbard, A. (1980). Two recent theories of conditionals. In W. L. Harper and G. Pearce (Eds.),Ifs (pp. 211–247). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Gigerenzer, G., &Hug, K. (1992). Domain-specific reasoning: Social contracts, cheating, and perspective change.Cognition,43, 127–171.
Griggs, R. A. (1983). The role of problem content in the selection task and in the THOG problem. In J. St. B. T. Evans (Ed.),Thinking and reasoning (pp. 16–43). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Byrne, R. M. J., &Schaeken, W. (1992). Propositional reasoning by model.Psychological Review,99, 418–439.
Marcus, S. L., &Rips, L. J. (1979). Conditional reasoning.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 199–223.
Markovits, H. (1984). Awareness of the ‘possible’ as a mediator of formal thinking in conditional reasoning problems.British Journal of Psychology,75, 367–376.
Markovits, H. (1986). Familiarity effects in conditional reasoning.Journal of Educational Psychology,78, 492–494.
Markovits, H., &Nantel, G. (1989). The belief-bias effect in the production and evaluation of logical conclusions.Memory & Cognition,17, 11–17.
Markovits, H., &Savary, F. (1992). Pragmatic schemas and the selection task: To reason or not to reason.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,45A, 133–148.
Newstead, S. E., Pollard, P., Evans, J. St. B. T., &Allen, J. L. (1992). The source of belief bias effects in syllogistic reasoning.Cognition,45, 257–284.
Oakhill, J., Johnson-Laird, P. N., &Garnham, A. (1989). Believability and syllogistic reasoning.Cognition,31, 117–140.
Pollard, P. (1982). Human reasoning: Some possible effects of availability.Cognition,12, 65–96.
Reich, S. S., &Ruth, P. (1982). Wason’s selection task: Verification, bias and matching.British Journal of Psychology,73, 395–405.
Rumaine, B., Connell, J., &Braine, M. D. S. (1983). Conversational comprehension processes are responsible for reasoning fallacies in children as well as adults: If is not the biconditional.Developmental Psychology,19, 471–481.
Staudenmayer, H. (1975). Understanding conditional reasoning with meaningful propositions. In R. J. Falmagne (Ed.),Reasoning: Representation and process (pp. 55–79). New York: Wiley.
Taplin, J. E. (1971). Reasoning with conditional sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 219–225.
Taplin, J. E., &Staudenmayer, H. (1973). Interpretation of abstract conditional sentences in deductive reasoning.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 530–542.
Thompson, V. A. (in press). Conditional reasoning: The necessary and sufficient conditions.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology.
Ward, S. L., Byrnes, J. P., &Overton, W. F. (1990). Organization of knowledge and conditional reasoning.Journal of Educational Psychology,82, 832–837.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by an NSERC postgraduate scholarship to the author, and by NSERC Operating Grant A0087 to Allan Paivio.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thompson, V.A. Interpretational factors in conditional reasoning. Memory & Cognition 22, 742–758 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209259
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209259