Abstract
Three experiments, using rats, demonstrated the encoding of a food unconditioned stimulus (US) in a simple Pavlovian conditioning paradigm. In all three studies, one stimulus was used to signal the delivery of pellets and a different stimulus was used to signal the delivery of sucrose. In Experiment 1, postconditioning devaluation of one of the food USs selectively reduced the frequency of conditioned magazine-directed behavior during the stimulus trained with that US. In Experiment 2, transfer of the stimuli to instrumental responses resulted in selective depression of the response trained with a different outcome. In Experiment 3, acquisition of stimulus-outcome learning was impaired by unsignaled intertrial presentations of the same outcome but not of a different outcome. These results indicate that a detailed representation of the outcome is encoded in the normal course of Pavlovian conditioning.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakal, C. W., Johnson, R. D., &Rescorla, R. A. (1974). The effect of change in US quality on the blocking effect.Pavlovian Journal of Biological Sciences,9, 97–103.
Baxter, D. J., &Zamble, E. (1982). Reinforcer and response specificity in appetitive transfer of control.Animal Learning & Behavior,10, 201–210.
Bull, J. A., III (1970). An interaction between appetitive Pavlovian CSs and instrumental avoidance responding.Learning & Motivation,1, 18–26.
Bull, J. A., III, &Overmter, J. B. (1968). Additive and subtractive properties of excitation and inhibition.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,66, 511–514.
Capaldi, E. D., Hovancik, J. R., &Friedman, F (1976). Effects of expectancies of different reward magnitudes in transfer from non-contingent pairings to instrumental performance.Learning & Motivation,7, 197–210.
Carlson, J. G., &Wielkiewicz, R. M. (1976). Mediators of the effects of magnitude of reinforcement.Learning & Motivation,7, 184–196.
Cleland, G. G., &Davey, G. C. L. (1982). The effects of satiation and reinforcer devaluation on signal-centered behavior in the rat.Learning & Motivation,13, 343–360.
Colwill, R. M. (1994). Associative representations of instrumental contingencies. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 28, pp. 1–72). New York: Academic Press.
Colwill, R. M., &Rescorla, R. A. (1985a). Extensive training, partial reinforcement, and temporal gaps do not affect S-S learning in second-order autoshaoping.Animal Learning & Behavior,13, 165–170.
Colwill, R. M., &Rescorla, R. A. (1985b). Post-conditioning devaluation of a reinforcer affects instrumental responding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,11, 120–132.
Colwill, R. M., &Rescorla, R. A. (1986). Associative structures in instrumental learning. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 20, pp. 55–104). New York: Academic Press.
Colwill, R. M., &Rescorla, R. A. (1988). Associations between the discriminative stimulus and the reinforcer in instrumental learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,14, 155–164.
Colwill, R. M., &Rescorla, R. A. (1990). Effect of reinforcer devaluation on discriminative control of instrumental behavior.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,16, 40–47.
Davey, G. C. L., &Cleland, G. G. (1982). Topography of signal-centered behavior in the rat: Effects of deprivation state and reinforcer type.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,38, 291–304.
Dickinson, A., &Mackintosh, N. J. (1979). Reinforcer specificity in the enhancement of conditioning by post trial surprise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,5, 162–177.
Dickinson, A., Nicholas, D. J., &Adams, C. D. (1983). The effect of the instrumental training contingency on susceptibility to reinforcer devaluation.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,35B, 35–51.
Durlach, P. J. (1983). The effect of signalling intertrial USs in au-toshaping.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,9, 374–389.
Durlach, P. J., &Shane, D. O. (1993). The effect of intertrial food presentations on anticipatory goal-tracking in the rat.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,46 B, 289–318.
Fantino, E. (1965). Some data on the discriminative stimulus hypothesis of secondary reinforcement.Psychological Record,15, 409–415.
Ganesan, R., &Pearce, J. M. (1988). Effect of changing the unconditioned stimulus on appetitive blocking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,14, 280–291.
Hawkins, R. D., Lalevic, N., Clark, G. A., &Kandel, E. R. (1989). Classical conditioning of theaplysia siphon-withdrawal reflex exhibits response specificity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,86, 7620–7624.
Holland, P. C. (1977). Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of the form of the Pavlovian conditioned response.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,3, 77–104.
Holland, P. C. (1979a). Differential effects of omission contingencies on various components of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responding in rats.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,5, 178–193.
Holland, P. C. (1979b). The effects of qualitative and quantitative variation in the US on individual components of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned behavior in rats.Animal Learning & Behavior,7, 424432.
Holland, P. C. (1984). Unblocking in Pavlovian appetitive conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,10, 476–497.
Holland, P. C. (1988). Excitation and inhibition in unblocking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,14, 261–279.
Holland, P. C., &Rescorla, R. A. (1975). Second-order conditioning with food unconditioned stimulus.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,88, 459467.
Holland, P. C., &Straub, J. J. (1979). Differential effects of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after Pavlovian appetitive conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,5, 65–78.
Jenkins, H. M., &Moore, B. R. (1973). The form of the autoshaped response with food or water reinforcers.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,20, 163–181.
Kaye, H., &Pearce, J. M. (1984). The strength of the orienting response during Pavlovian conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,10, 90–109.
Kruse, J. M., Overmter, J. B., Konz, W. A., &Rokke, E. (1983). Pavlovian conditioned stimulus effects upon instrumental choice behavior are reinforcer specific.Learning & Motivation,14, 165–181.
Lamon, B. C., &Ztegler, H. P. (1984). Grasping in the pigeon (Columbia livid): Stimulus control during conditioned and consummatery responses.Animal Learning & Behavior,12, 223–231.
Mackintosh, N. J. (1983).Conditioning and associative learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morgan, M. J. (1974). Resistance to satiation.Animal Behaviour,22, 449–466.
Pavlov, I. P. (1927).Conditioned reflexes (G. V Anrep, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.
Rescorla, R. A. (1973). Effect of US habituation following conditioning.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,82, 137–143.
Rescorla, R. A. (1977). Pavlovian second-order conditioning: Some implications for instrumental behavior. In H. Davis & H. M. B. Hurwitz (Eds.),Operant-Pavlovian interactions (pp. 133–164). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rescorla, R. A. (1980).Pavlovian second-order conditioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rescorla, R. A. (1984). Signaling intertrial shocks attenuates their negative effect on conditioned suppression.Bulletin of the Psycho-nomic Society,22, 225–228.
Rescorla, R. A., &Cunningham, C. L. (1978). Within-compound flavor associations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,4, 267–275.
Rescorla, R. A., &Lolokdo, V. M. (1965). Inhibition of avoidance behavior.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,59, 406–412.
Skelton, R. W., Spetch, M. L., &Wilkte, D. M. (1980). A method for automatically recording topographical differences in pigeons’ keypecking for food and water reinforcers.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 349–352.
Spetch, M. L., Wilkie, D. M., &Skelton, R. W. (1981). Control of pigeons’ keypecking topography by a schedule of alternating food and water reward.Animal Learning & Behavior,9, 223–229.
Stanhope, K. J. (1989). Dissociation of the effect of reinforcer type and response strength on the force of a conditioned response.Animal Learning & Behavior,17, 311–321.
Stanhope, K. J. (1990). Effect of intertrial unconditioned stimulus (US) presentations upon responding to a conditioned stimulus predictive of either the same or a different appetitive US.Learning & Motivation,21, 266–286.
Stanhope, K. J. (1992). The representation of the reinforcer and the force of the pigeon’s keypeckin first- and second-order conditioning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,44B, 137–158.
Stickney, K. J., &Donahoe, J. W. (1983). Attenuation of blocking by a change in US locus.Animal Learning & Behavior,11, 60–66.
Tate, M. W., &Clelland, R. C. (1957).Nonparametric and shortcut statistics in the social, biological and medical sciences. Danville, IL: Interstate Printers and Publishers.
Trapold, M. A. (1970). Are expectancies based upon different positive reinforcing events discriminably different?Learning & Motivation,1, 129–140.
Walters, E. T. (1989). Transformation of siphon responses during conditioning ofaplysia suggests a model of primitive stimulus-response association.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,86, 7616–7619.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
These experiments were supported by National Science Foundation Grants BNS 83-08176, to R. A. Rescorla, and BNS 89-15342, to R.M.C.; by a Brown University grant, BRSG 5-27469, to R.M.C.; and by an award from the Nassau Fund of the University of Pennsylvania to D.K.M. We thank R. A. Rescorla for helpful comments on a previous version of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Colwill, R.M., Motzkin, D.K. Encoding of the unconditioned stimulus in Pavlovian conditioning. Animal Learning & Behavior 22, 384–394 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209158
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209158