Abstract
Man possesses a central system of limited capacity. Theorists at first described this system as a single limited capacity channel Two current theoretical alternatives to single-channel theory are (1) the undifferentiated capacity hypothesis that man possesses a pool of capacity units so that interference occurs oniy if the total number of capacity units that mental operations demand exceeds the system limit and (2) the hypothesis that some, but not all, mental operations require space in a limited capacity central mechanism and that any operation that requires space will interfere with any other operation that also demands space. Time on task fails as a sensitive measure of capacity demands because some task components require time but not full processing capacity. The secondary task technique uses the interference between a primary task and a secondary task to assess the extent to which the primary task makes processing demands on the central limited system. Processing demands have been measured for five categories of mental operation: (1) encoding, (2) multiple input, (3) rehearsal, (4) transformation, and (5) responding.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, D. A., Antonis, B., & Reynolds, P. On the division of attention: A disproof of the single channel hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 24, 225–235.
Bahrick, H. P., Noble, M., & Fitts, P. M. Extratask performance as a measure of learning a primary task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954, 48,298–302.
Bertelson, P. Central intermittency twenty years later. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966, 18, 153–163.
Binet, A. La concurrence des etats psychologiques. Revue Philosophique de la France et de L’etranger, 1890, 29, 138–155.
Broadbent, D. E.Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon, 1958.
Broadbent, D. E.Decision and stress. London: Academic Press, 1971.
Brooks, L. R. The suppression of visualization by reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967, 19, 289–299.
Brown, I. D., & Poulton, E. C. Measuring the spare “mental capacity” of car drivers by a subsidiary task. Ergonomics, 1961, 4, 35–40.
Brown, J. Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958, 10, 12–21.
Comstock, E. M. Processing capacity in a letter-matching task. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Massachusetts, 1972.
Conrad, C. E. H. Studies of the subjective lexicon. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1972.
Crowder, R. G. Verbal short-term memory as a function of degree of learning on a perceptual-motor interpolated activity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1964.
Deutsch, J. A., & Deutsch, D. Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 1963, 70, 80–90.
Diller, R. D. Reaction time characteristics of an impression-formation task. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1971.
Ells, J. G. Attentional requirements of movement control. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Oregon, 1969.
Feynman, R.The character of physical law. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1965.
Foss, D. J. Decision processes during sentence comprehension. Effect of lexical item difficulty and position upon decision times. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1969, 8, 457–462.
Foss, D. J., & Lynch, R. H., Jr. Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effect of lexical item difficulty and position upon decision times. Perception & Psychophysics, 1969, 5,145–148.
Garvey, W. D., & Taylor, F. V. Interactions among operator variables, system dynamics, and task-induced stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1959, 43, 79–85.
Greenwald, A. G. On doing two things at once: Time sharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 94, 52–57.
James, W.The principles of psychology. New York: Holt, 1890.
Jastrow, J. The interference of mental processes. American Journal of Psychology, 1891–1892, 4, 219–223.
Johnston, W. A., Greenberg, S. N., Fisher, R. P., & Martin, D. W. Divided attention: A vehicle for monitoring memory processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970, 83, 164–171.
Johnston, W. A., Griffith, D., & Wagstaff, R. Speed, accuracy and ease of recall. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1972a, 11,512–520.
Johnston, W. A., Wagstaff, R. R., & Griffith, D. Information processing analysis of verbal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972b, 307–314.
Kahneman, D. Remarks on attention control. Acta Psychologica, 1970, 33, 118–131.
Kahneman, D.Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1973, in press.
Kahneman, D., Beatty, J., & Pollack, I. Perceptual deficit during a mental task. Science, 1967, 157,218–219.
Kariln, L., & Kestenbaum, R. Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 20, 167–178.
Keele, S. W. Compatibility and time-sharing in serial reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967, 75, 529–539.
Keele, S. W.Attention and human performance. Pacific Palisades, Cailf: Goodyear Publishing, 1973.
Leonard, J. A. Tactual choice reactions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959, 11, 76–83.
Martin, D. W. Residual processing capacity during verbal organization in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1970, 9, 391–397.
Moray, N. Where is capacity limited? A survey and a model. Acta Psychologica, 1967, 27, 84–92.
Mowbray, G. H., & Rhoades, M. U. On the reduction of choice reaction time with practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959, 11, 16–23.
Noble, M., Trumbo, D., & Fowler, F. Further evidence on secondary task interference in tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967, 79, 146–149.
Norman, D. A. Toward a theory of memory and attention. Psychological Review, 1968, 75,522–536.
Peterson, L. R. Concurrent verbal activity. Psychological Review, 1969, 76,376–386.
Peterson, L. R., & Petdrson, M. J. Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959, 58, 193–198.
Posner, M. I., & Boles, S. J. Components of attention. Psychological Review, 1971, 78,391–408.
Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. Attention demands of movements.Proceedings of the XVllth Congressof Applied Psychology. Amsterdam: Zeitlinger, 1969.
Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. Time and space as measures of mental operations. Invited address. Division 3. American Psychological Association, September 1970.
Posner, M. I., & Klein, R. On the functions of consciousness. In S. Kornblum (Ed.).Attention and performance IV New York: Academic Press, 1973. Pp. 21–35.
Posner, M. I., & Rossman, E. Effects of size and location of informational transforms upon short-term retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology,1965, 70, 496–505.
Savin, H. B., & Bever, T. G. The nonperceptual reality of the phoneme. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1970, 9, 295–302.
Seibel, R. Discrimination reaction time for a 1,023 alternative task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 66, 215–226.
Shallice, T. Dual functions of consciousness. Psychological Review, 1972, 79, 383–393.
Shulman, H. G., & Greenberg, S. N. Perceptual deficit due to division of attention between memory and perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 88, 171–176.
Shulman, H. G., Greenberg, S. N., & Martin,J. Intertask delay as a parameter of perceptual deficit in divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 88,439–440.
Stanners, R. F., Meunier, G. F., & Headley, D. B. Reaction time as an index of rehearsal in short term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 82, 566–570.
Trumbo, D., & Milone, F. Primary task performance as a function of encoding, retention, and recall in a secondary task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 91, 272–279.
Trumbo, D., & Noble, M. Secondary task effect on serial verbal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970, 85, 418–424.
Warren, R. E. Stimulus encoding and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 94, 90–100.
Welch, J. C. On the measurement of mental activity through muscular activity and the determination of a constant attention. American Journal of Physiology, 1898, 1, 283–306.
Welford, A. T. The “psychological refractory period” and the timing of high speed performance: A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 1952, 43, 2–19.
Welford, A. T.Fundamentals of skill. London: Methuen, 1968.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I would like to thank Michael Posner and Steven W. Keele for their suggestions and comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. This paper was written while the author was supported by a NIMH predoctora research fellowship.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kerr, B. Processing demands during mental operations. Memory & Cognition 1, 401–412 (1973). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208899
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208899