Abstract
New perceptual objects are known to capture attention. We show that such attentional capture is similar to that produced by peripheral luminance changes, as opposed to symbolic central cues, in that it produces inhibition of return. Two experiments employed equiluminant texture changes that attracted attention, producing an initial attentional benefit (in detection and discrimination) followed by inhibition of return. However, when the display was altered so that the texture change did not define a new object, no facilitation or inhibition was observed. The results bolster recent claims of the importance of new perceptual objects and extend our understanding of the effect of such objects on attention.
Article PDF
References
Abrams, R. A., &Dobkin, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 467–477.
Di Lollo, V. (1980). Temporal integration in vision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 75–97.
Egeth, H. E., &Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation and time course.Annual Review of Psychology,48, 269–297.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Gibson, B. S. (1996a). The masking account of attentional capture: A reply to Yantis and Jonides (1996).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1514–1522.
Gibson, B. S. (1996b). Visual quality and attentional capture: A challenge to the special role of abrupt onset.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1496–1504.
Klein, R. M. (1994). Perceptual-motor expectancies interact with covert visual orienting under conditions of endogenous but not exogenous control.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,48, 167–181.
Kwak, H.-W., &Egeth, H. (1992). Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 455–464.
Law, M. B., Pratt, J., &Abrams, R. A. (1995). Color-based inhibition of return.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 402–408.
Maylor, E. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 189–204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Maylor, E., &Hockey, R. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 777–787.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention [Seventh Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture].Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual attention. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bowhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–536). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., &Ogden, W. C. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In H. L. Pick & E. J. Saltzman (Eds.),Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp. 137–157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pratt, J. (1995). Inhibition of return in a discrimination task.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 117–120.
Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P. A., Brennan, C. W., &Sciolto, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 673–685.
Riggio, L., &Kirsner, K. (1997). The relationship between central cues and peripheral cues in covert visual orientation.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 885–889.
Stelmach, L. B., Campsal, J. M., &Herdman, C. M. (1997). Attentional and ocular movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 823–844.
Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L. M., &Burak, A. L. (1994). Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 478–499.
Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 45–76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Yantis, S. (1998). Control of visual attention. In H. Pashler (Ed.),Attention (pp. 223–256). London: Psychology Press.
Yantis, S., &Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 95–107.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1996). Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: New perceptual objects or visual masking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1505–1513.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant R01-MH45145 from the National Institutes of Health to R.A.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oonk, H.M., Abrams, R.A. New perceptual objects that capture attention produce inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5, 510–515 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208830
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208830