Abstract
Three experiments examined the effects of changes in retinal locus and locational uncertainty in the processing of hierarchical stimuli. In Experiment 1, stimuli were presented randomly in the left, center, or right portions of a display. Central presentation decreased reaction times for identifying small letters presented within a hierarchical stimulus pattern (i.e., local letters) but not for a single small letter presented alone. In Experiment 2, all stimuli were presented centrally, thus eliminating the locational uncertainty that existed in Experiment 1. The elimination of locational uncertainty resulted in faster reaction times (as compared with the central data of Experiment 1) for identifying small letters, whether or not they appeared in a hierarchical pattern. In Experiment 3, eye movements were monitored and eliminated as a possible source of these effects. The results are discussed in terms of possible effects of an attentional “spotlight” on hierarchical stimulus processing. It was also found that the identity of the target letter (i.e., whether it was an H or an S) had a large effect on performance. Finally, in contrast to earlier findings (Hoffman, 1980; Martin, 1979), the response-time advantage at a given level and the amount of Stroop-type interference produced at the other level did not always covary, suggesting that these two effects may reflect the operation of separate mechanisms.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boer, L. C, &Keuss, P. J. G. (1982). Global precedence as a post-perceptual effect: An analysis of speed-accuracy tradeoff functions.Perception & Psychophysics,31, 358–366.
Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984).Visual masking: An integrative approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Eriksen, C. W., &St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 225–240.
Eriksen, C. W., &Yeh, Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 583–597.
Grice, G. C, Canham, L., &Boroughs, J. M. (1983). Forest before trees? It depends where you look.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 121–128.
Hoffman, J. (1980). Interaction between global and local levels of form.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 222–234.
Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, J., &Quilan, T. T. (1986). Interactive processes in perceptual organization: Evidence from visual ag-nosia. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 301–318). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Johnston, W. A., &Dark, V. J. (1986). Selective attention. In M. R. Rosenzwieg & L. W. Porter (Eds.),Annual review of psychology (p. 43–75). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
Jonides, J. (1983). Further toward a model of the mind’s eye.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,21, 247–250.
Kimchi, R., &Palmer, S. E. (1982). Form and texture in hierarchically constructed patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 521–535.
Kinchla, R. A., Sous-Macias, V., &Hoffman, J. (1983). Attending to different levels of structure in a visual image.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 1–10.
Kinchla, R. A., &Wolfe, J. (1979). The order of visual processing: “Top down,” “bottom up,” or “middle out.”Perception & Psychophysics,25, 225–231.
Koffka, K. (1935).Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Academic Press.
Lamb, M. R., &Robertson, L. C (1987). The effects of acute alcohol on attention and the processing of hierarchical patterns.Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research,11, 243–248.
Lamb, M. R., Robertson, L. C, & Knight, R. T. (in press). Attention and interference in the processing of global and local information: Effects of unilateral temporal-parietal junction lesions.Neuropsychologia.
Martom, M. (1979). Local and global processing: The role of sparsity.Memory & Cognition,7, 476–484.
Miller, J. (1981). Global precedence in attention and decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 1161–1174.
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception.Cognitive Psycholoogy,9, 353–383.
Navon, D. (1981). DO attention and decision follow perception? Comment on Miller.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 1175–1182.
Navon, D., &Norman, J. (1983). Does global precedence really depend on visual angle?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 955–965.
Pomerantz, J. R. (1983). Global and local precedence: Selective attention in form and motion perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 516–540.
Robertson, L. C. (1986). From gestalt to neo-gestalt. In T. J. Knapp & L. C. Robertson (Eds.),Aproaches to recognition: Contrasts and controversies (pp. 159–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Robertson, L. C, Lamb, M. R., & Knight, R. T. (in press). Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans.Journal of Neuroscience.
Robertson, L. C, &Palmer, S. E. (1983). Holistic processes in the perception and transformation of disoriented figures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 203–214.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psycholoogy,18, 643–661.
Titchner, E. (1909).Experimental psychology of the thought processes. New York: MacMillan.
Ward, L. M. (1982). Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 562–581.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by the Medical Research Council of the Veterans Administration and NIAAA Grant AA06637 awarded to the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lamb, M.R., Robertson, L.C. The processing of hierarchical stimuli: Effects of retinal locus, locational uncertainty, and stimulus identity. Perception & Psychophysics 44, 172–181 (1988). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208710
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208710