Abstract
Using comparable stimulus and response sets, and the same Ss, the “repetition” and “same-different” effects were studied in two experiments involving several reaction-time (RT) tasks. In Experiment 1, these effects were examined at a 2-sec interval between successive stimuli in the simple (SRT), the recognition (RRT), the choice (CRT), the same-different recognition(S-DRRT),and the same-different choice (S-DCRT) tasks. In Experiment 2, the effects were studied at a 1 O-sec interval in the CRT and S-DCRT tasks. The results suggest the following mainconclusions: (1)The positive repetition effect (i.e., shorter reaction times on “repeated” trials than on “nonrepeated” trials) is not only a feature of the CRT task but may also occur in the SRT and RRT tasks. (2) With increasing intertrial interval, the magnitude of the positive repetition effect diminishes and then reverses into a negative repetition effect. (3) The positive same-different effect (ie., shorter reaction times on “same” trials than on “different” trials) is affected by an increase in interstimulus interval ina manner that parallels the effect of intertrial interval on the positive repetition effect, suggesting that the processes underlying the two effects are mainly the same. (4) These changes in the magnitude and direction of the repetition and same-different effects are probably a function of discrimination difficulty.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BERTELSON, P. S-R relationships and reaction times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 65, 478–484.
BERTELSON, P. Serial choice reaction-time as a function of response versus signal-and-response repetition. Nature, 1965, 206, 217–218.
BERTELSON, P., & RENKIN, A. Reaction times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task as a function of response-signal time interval. Acta Psychologica, 1966, 25, 132–136.
BINDRA, D., DONDERI, D. C., & NISHISATO, S. Decision latencies of “same” and “different” judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 1968, 3, 121–130.
BINDRA, D., WILLIAMS, J. A., & WISE, J. S. Judgments of sameness and difference: Experiments on decision time. Science, 1965, 150, 1625–1627.
CORBALLIS, M. C., LIEBERMAN, W., & BINDRA, D. Discriminability and central intermittency in same-different judgments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 20, 51–61.
DONDERS, F. C. Überdie Schnelligkeit psychischer Prozesse. ArclüVfür Anat. Physiologie, Leipzig, 1868, 657–681.
HALE, D. J. Sequential effects in a two-choice serial reaction task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967, 19, 133–141.
KLEIN, M. Intersensory and intrasensory comparisons. Unpublished BA Honors thesis, McC-ill University, 1968.
MOSS, S. M., ENGEL, S., & FABERMAN, D. Altemation and repetition reaction times under three schedules of event sequencing. Psychonomie Science, 1967, 9, 557–558.
NICKERSON, R. S. Response times for “same-different” judgments. Perceptual & Motor Sküls, 1965, 20, 15–18.
NICKERSON, R. S. “Same-different” response times with multi-attribute stimulus differences. Perceptual & Motor Sküls, 1967, 24, 543–554.
SMITH, M. C. Repetition effect and short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 77, 435–439.
WALK, R. D. Perceptual learning and the discrimination of wines. Psychonomie Science, 1965, 5, 57–58.
WILLIAMS, J. A. Sequential effects in disjunctive reaction time: Implications for decision models. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966, 71, 665–673.
WINER, B. J.Statistical principles in experimental design, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by a contract [No. NONR-4896 (00)] between the U.S. Office of Naval Research and McGill University and a grant (No. DRB 9425-10) from the Canadian Defence Research Board. We thank M. C. Corballis for statistical advice.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Entus, A., Bindra, D. Common features of the “repetition” and “same-different” effects in reaction time experiments. Perception & Psychophysics 7, 143–148 (1970). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208643
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208643