Abstract
This research uses comparative judgments of the relative loudness of sounds to make a critical test of one theory of the mental representation of continuous physical attributes. The first two experiments find a semantic congruity effect, which is an interaction such that subjects can pick the louder of two loud sounds faster than the softer, and the softer of two quiet sounds faster than the louder. According to the theory under test, physical quantities are stored as points on a representational continuum, with a variance as well as a mean placement on it. The theory predicts the semantic congruity effect by assuming that the variance of placement of intensities on the representational continuum is a function of the direction of judgment: a soft sound will have less variance than a loud one when judged for softness and more when judged for loudness. Since the speed of making a judgment increases as variance decreases, the theory predicts a semantic congruity effect. However, for loudness, it can be shown that variance does not change in the manner assumed. The finding of a semantic congruity effect therefore disconfirms the theory. Alternative models are discussed. This research was supported by NSF Grant BNS 78-17442.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R. Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery.Psychological Review, 1978,85, 249–277.
Banks, W. P. Encoding and processing of symbolic information in comparative judgments. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 11). New York: Academic Press, 1977.
Banks, W. P., &Barber, G. Color information in iconic memory.Psychological Review, 1977,84, 536–546.
Banks, W. P., Clark, H. H., &Lucy, P. The locus of the semantic congruity effect in comparative judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975,1, 35–47.
Banks, W. P., &Flora, J. Semantic and perceptual processes in symbolic comparisons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977,3, 278–290.
Banks, W. P., Fujii, M., &Kayra-Stuart, F. Semantic congruity effects in comparative judgments of magnitude of digits.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976,2, 435–447.
Clark, H. H., &Brownell, H. H. Judging up and down.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975,104, 339–352.
Dyer, F. N. The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes.Memory & Cognition, 1973,1, 106–120.
Jamieson, D. G., &Petrusic, W. M. Relational judgments with remembered stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,18, 373–378.
Marks, D. F. Relative judgment: A phenomenon and a theory.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,11, 156–160.
Moyer, R. S. Comparing objects in memory: Evidence suggesting an internal psychophysics.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,13, 180–184.
Moyer, R. S., &Bayer, R. H. Mental comparison and the symbolic distance effect.Cognitive Psychology, 1976,8, 228–246.
Movek, R. M., &Dumais, S. T. Mental comparison. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 12). New York: Academic Press, 1978.
Paiwo, A. Perceptual comparisons through the mind’s eye.Memory & Cognition, 1975,3, 635–647.
Schneider, R., &Lane, H. Ratio scales, category scales, and variability in the production of loudness and softness.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1963,35, 1953–1961.
Wallis, C. P., &Audley, R. J. Response instructions and the speed of relative judgments: II. Pitch discrimination.British Journal of Psychology, 1964,55, 121–132.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Banks, W.P., Root, M. Semantic congruity effects in judgments of loudness. Perception & Psychophysics 26, 133–142 (1979). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208307
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208307