Abstract
Predictions of an automatic-imagery, strategic-imagery, and context-availability hypothesis of concreteness effects in free recall were examined. In each experiment, recall of abstract and concrete words controlled for rated context availability was compared with the typical situation in which context availability is confounded with imageability. In Experiment 1, a directed intentional-recall task produced concreteness effects in recall. Experiment 2 compared concreteness effects in recall following three orienting tasks: imagery rating, context-availability rating, and a directed intentional-memory task. Concreteness effects in the context-availability-controlled condition were found following the imagery-rating and the directed intentional-memory tasks, but not after the context-availability-rating task. In Experiment 3, subjects reported the strategies that they used to encode the list. Subjects reporting an imagery strategy showed concreteness effects for words controlled for rated context availability, but those not reporting it did not. These results support a strategic-imagery view of concreteness effects in free recall.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories.Memory & Cognition,11, 211–227.
Barsalou, L. W. (1985). Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 629–654.
Barsalou, L. W., &Medin, D. L. (1986). Concepts: Static definitions or context-dependent representations?Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive,6, 187–202.
Berrian, R. W., Metzler, D. P., Kroll, N. E. A., &Clark-Meyers, G. M. (1979). Estimates of imagery, ease of definition, and animateness for 328 adjectives.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 435–447.
Bransford, J. D., &McCarrell, N. S. (1974). A sketch of a cognitive approach to comprehension: Some thoughts on what it means to comprehend. In W. Weimer & D. Palermo (Eds.),Cognition and the symbolic processes (pp. 189–230). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brewer, W. F. (1975). Memory for ideas: Synonym substitution.Memory & Cognition,3, 458–464.
Brown, J. I., Bennett, J. M., &Hanna, G. (1981).The Nelson-Denny Reading Test (Form E). Lombard, IL: Riverside.
Christian, J., Bickley, W., Tarka, M., &Clayton, K. (1978). Measures of free recall of 900 English nouns: Correlations with imagery, concreteness, meaningfulness, and frequency.Memory & Cognition,6, 379–390.
Ericsson, K. A., &Simon, M. A. (1984).Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fabricius, W. V., &Cavalier, L. (1989). The role of causal theories about memory in young children’s strategy choice.Child Development,60, 298–308.
Fabricius, W. V., &Hagen, J. W. (1984). The use of causal attributions about recall performance to assess metamemory and predict strategic memory behavior in young children.Developmental Psychology,20, 975–987.
Francis, W. N., &Kučera, H. (1982).Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Glass, A. L., Eddy, J. K., &Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1980). The verification ofhigh and low imagery sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 692–704.
Glass, A. L., Millen, D. R., Beck, L. G., &Eddy, J. K. (1985). Representation of images in sentence verification.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 442–465.
Greenspan, S. L. (1986). Semantic flexibility and referential specificity of concrete nouns.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 539–557.
Groninger, L. D., &Groninger, L. K. (1982). Function of images during the encoding-retrieval process.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 353–358.
Kieras, D. (1978). Beyond pictures and words: Alternative information processing models for imagery effects in verbal memory.Psychological Bulletin,85, 532–554.
Kirk, R. E. (1982).Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1980).Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Marschark, M. (1985). Imagery and organization in the recall of high and low imagery prose.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 734–745.
Marschark, M., &Paivio, A. (1977). Integrative processing of concrete and abstract sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 217–231.
Nagy, W. E., &Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English?Reading Research Quarterly,19, 304–330.
Pavio, A. (1965). Abstractness, imagery, and meaningfulness in paired associate learning.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,4, 32–38.
Paivio, A. (1971).Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Paivio, A. (1975). Coding distinctions and repetition effects in memory In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 9, pp. 179- 215). New York: Academic Press.
Paivio, A. (1986).Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paivio, A., &Csapo, K. (1969). Concrete-image and verbal memory codes.Journal of Experimental Psychology,80, 279–285.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. D., &Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,76 (1, Pt. 2), 1–25.
Peterson, R. (1974). Imagery and cued recall: Concreteness or context?Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 841–844.
Rubin, D. C. (1980). 51 properties of 125 words: A unit of analysis of verbal behavior.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 736–755.
Rubin, D. C. (1983). Associative asymmetry, availability, and retrieval.Memory & Cognition,11, 83–92.
Rubin, D. C. (1985). Memorability as a measure of processing: A unit of analysis of prose and list learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,114, 213–238.
Rubin, D. C., &Friendly, M. (1986). Predicting which words get recalled: Measures of free recall, availability, goodness, emotionality, and pronunciability for 925 nouns.Memory & Cognition,14, 79–94.
Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1991). Why are abstract concepts hard to understand? In P. J. Schwanenflugel (Ed.),The psychology of word meanings (pp. 223–250). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Harnishfeger, K. K., &Stowe, R. W. (1988). Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 499–520.
Schwanenflugel, P. J., &Shoben, E. J. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 82–102.
Schwanenflugel, P. J., &Stowe, R. W. (1989). Context availability and the processing of abstract and concrete words in sentences.Reading Research Quarterly,24, 114–126.
Vellutino, F. R., &Scanlon, D. M. (1985). Free recall of concrete and abstract words in poor and normal readers.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,39, 363–380.
Watienmaker, W. D., &Shoben, E. J. (1987). Context and the recallability of concrete and abstract sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 140–150.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Preparation of this article was supported in part by Grant BNS-8808453 from the National Science Foundation to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schwanenflugel, P.J., Akin, C. & Luh, WM. Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Mem Cogn 20, 96–104 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208259
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208259