Abstract
Previous research has demonstrated that discriminability of target and background elements has powerful effects on visual search performance. Typically, discriminability has been manipulated between blocks or subjects, allowing subjects to anticipate the discriminability in advance of each trial, and the results, therefore, have been consistent with a wide range of models. Two experiments are reported in which the number of distractors similar to the target was varied from trial to trial, preventing such anticipation. In Experiment 1, subjects’ response times increased as target-confusable distractors were added, for both “yes” and “no” responses. In Experiment 2, subjects searched for either of two targets. Distractors similar to one target slowed down detection of either that target or the other target, to similar degrees. The results indicate that decision noise, rather than feature-specific inhibition, is the major source of the latency effects. The results do not support models proposing that decisions in speeded search are based upon information integrated across all positions in the display. The data also would require (perhaps implausible) modification of the independent-channels model. They are broadly consistent, however, with models hypothesizing a parallel search followed by some slow serial checking, such as that developed by Hoffman (1978).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. A. (1977). Neural models with cognitive implications. In D. LaBerge & S. Samuels (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 27–90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Colegate, R. L. Hoffman, J. E., &Eriksen, C. W. (1973). Selective encoding from multielement visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 217–224.
Corcoran, D. W. J., &Jackson, A. (1977). Basic processes and strategies in visual search. In S. Domic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Duncan, J. (1980a). The demonstration of capacity limitation.Cognitive Psychology,12, 75–96.
Duncan, J. (1980b). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli.Psychological Review,87, 272–300.
Duncan, J. (1983). Category effects in visual search: A failure to replicate the “oh-zero” phenomenon.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 221–232.
Egeth, H., &Santee, J. L. (1981). Conceptual and perceptual components of ioterletter inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 506–517.
Eriksen, C. W., &Spencer, T. (1969). Rate of information processing in visual perception: Some results and methodological considerations.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph,79(2, Part 2).
Estes, W. K. (1972). Interactions of signal and background variables in visual piocessing.Perception & Psychophysics,12, 278–286.
Estes, W. K. (1982). Similarity-related channel interactions in visual processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 353–380.
EStes, W., &Taylor, H. (1964). A detection method and probabilistic models for assessing information processing from brief visual displays.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science,52, 446–454.
Gardner, G. T. (1972). Evidence for independent parallel channels in tachistoscopic perception.Cognitive Psychology,4, 130–155.
Gilmore, G. C. (1980). Letter interactions in brief visual displays.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 649–668.
Hoffman, J. E. (1978). Search through a sequentially presented visual display.Perception & Psychophysics,23, 1–11.
Hoffman, J. E. (1979). A two-stage model of visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 319–327.
Kinchla, R. A. (1974), Detecting target elements in multi-element arrays: A confusability model.Perception & Psychophysics,15, 149–158.
Krueger, L. (1984). Self-termination in same-different judgements: Multiletter comparison with simultaneous and sequential presentationJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cogrution,10,271–2855.
Logan, G. (1978). Attention in character classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticity of component stages.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,107, 32–63.
Logan, G. D., &Zbrodoff, N. J. (1982). Constraints on strategy construction in a speeded oUscrimination task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 502–520.
Logan, G. D., Zbrodoff, N. J., &Fostey, A. (1983). Costs and benefits of strategy construction in a speeded discrimination taskMemory & Cognition,11, 485–493.
Pashler, H., &Badgio, P. (1985) Visual attention and stimulus identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 105–121.
Santee, J L., &Egeth, H. E. (1982). Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition?Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,8, 489–501
Shiffrin, R. M., &Gardner, G T. (1972). Visual processing capacity and attentional control.Journal of Experimental Psychology,93, 72–83.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Geisler, W. S. (1973). Visual recognition in a theory of information processing. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),The Loyola Symposium: Contemporary viewpoints in cognitive psychology. Washington, DC: Winston.
van der Heuden, A. H. C, Malhas, M. S. M., &van den Roovart, B. P. (1984). An empirical interletter confusion matrix for continuous line capitals.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 85–88.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pashler, H. Target-distractor discriminability in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics 41, 285–292 (1987). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208228
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208228