Abstract
Reaction-time studies of numerical comparison have used essentially two paradigms:classification, in which a target number must be labelled “larger” or “smaller” in comparison to a fixed standard, andselection, in which the larger (or smaller) number of a pair must be picked out. In previous studies, classification has yielded only a distance effect in RTs, whereas selection has also revealedmagnitude (orminimum) andcongruity effects. We used two experiments with two-digit number comparisons to find the reason for this discrepancy. In Experiment 1, we used a variant of the classification task with the standard changing on each trial. RTs increased along with the standard for “smaller” responses and decreased along with the standard for “larger” responses, in a manner reminiscent of magnitude and congruity effects. In Experiment 2, we again used classification, but the fixed standard 75 was not at the center of the range of target numbers (20, 21, ... 99). Close to the standard, RTs were faster for “larger” than for “smaller” responses, again a congruity effect. Our data show that magnitude and congruity effects can be obtained with two-digit numbers in classification as well as in selection tasks. A single equation, which implies that numbers are compared with respect to reference points at both ends of the continuum, describes the results from both tasks.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Audley, R. J., &Walus, C. P. (1964). Response instructions and the speed of relative judgments: I. Some experiments on brightness discrimination.British Journal of Psychology,55, 59–73.
Banks, W. P., Fujii, M., &Kayra-Stuart, F. (1976). Semantic congruity effects in comparative judgments of magnitudes of digits.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 435–447.
Banks, W. P., &Root, M. (1979). Semantic congruity effects in judgments of loudness.Perception & Psychophysics,26, 133–142.
Buckley, P. B., &Gillman, C. B. (1974). Comparison of digits and dot patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology,103, 1131–1136.
Dehaene, S., Duroux, E., & Mehler, J. (1989).Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Duncan, E. M., &McFarland, C. E., Jr. (1980). Isolating the effects of symbolic distance and semantic congruity in comparative judgments: An additive-factors analysis.Memory & Cognition,8, 612–622.
Hinrichs, J. Y., Yurko, D. S., &Hu, J. M. (1981). Two-digit number companson: Use of place Information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 890–901.
Holyoak, K. J. (1977). The form of analog size information in memory.Cognitive Psychology,9, 31–51.
Holyoak, K. J. (1978). Comparative judgments with numerical reference points.Cognitive Psychology,10, 203–243.
Holyoak, K. J., &Mah, W. A. (1982). Cognitive reference points In judgments of symbolic magnitude.Cognitive Psychology,14, 328–352.
Jamieson, D. G, & Petrusic, W. M. (1975). Relational judgments with remembered stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,18, 373–378.
Johnson, D. M. (1939). Confidence and speed in the two-category Judgment.Archives of Psychology,241, 1–52.
Kosslyn, S. M., Murphy, G. L., Bemesderfer, M. E., &Feinstein, K. J. (1977). Category and continuum in mental comparisons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 341–375.
Marks, D. F. (1972). Relative judgment: A phenomenon and a theory.Perception & Psychophysics,11, 156–160.
Moyer, R. S. (1973). Comparing objects in memory: Evidence suggesting an Internal psychophysics.Perception & Psychophysics,13, 180–184.
Moyer, R. S., &Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgements of numerical inequality.Nature,215, 1519–1520.
Parkman, J. M. (1971). Temporal aspects of digit and letter inequality judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology,91, 191–205.
Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers.Journal of Experimental Psychology,83, 274–278.
Sekuler, R., &Mierkiewlcz, D. (1977). Children’s judgments of numerical inequality.Child Development,48, 630–633.
Sekuler, R., Rubin, E., &Armstrong, R. (1971). Processing numerical Information. A choice tune analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology,90, 75–80.
Welford, A. T. (1960). The measurement of sensory-motor performance: Survey and reappraisal of twelve years’ progress.Ergonomics,3, 189–230.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by grants from the CNRS (ASP Processus cognitifs en jeu dans la production et la comprehension du langage) and the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dehaene, S. The psychophysics of numerical comparison: A reexamination of apparently incompatible data. Perception & Psychophysics 45, 557–566 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208063
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208063