Abstract
Stelmach, Herdman, and McNeil (1994) suggested recently that the perceived duration for attended stimuli is shorter than that for unattended ones. In contrast, the attenuation hypothesis (Thomas & Weaver, 1975) suggests the reverse relation between directed attention and perceived duration. We conducted six experiments to test the validity of the two contradictory hypotheses. In all the experiments, attention was directed to one of two possible stimulus sources. Experiments 1 and 2 employed stimulus durations from 70 to 270 msec. A stimulus appeared in either the visual or the auditory modality. Stimuli in the attended modality were rated as longer than stimuli in the unattended modality. Experiment 3 replicated this finding using a different psychophysical procedure. Experiments 4-6 showed that the finding applies not only to stimuli from different sensory modalities but also to stimuli appearing at different locations within the visual field. The results of all six experiments support the assumption that directed attention prolongs the perceived duration of a stimulus.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan, L. G. (1977). The time-order error in judgments of duration.Canadian Journal of Psychology,31, 24–31.
Allan, L. G. (1979). The perception of time.Perception & Psychophysics,26, 340–354.
Block, R. A. (1994). Time-order errors. In S. L. Macey (Ed.),Encyclopedia of time (pp. 632). New York: Garland.
Brown, S. W., &West, A. N. (1990). Multiple timing and the allocation of attention.Acta Psychologica,75, 103–121.
Bush, R. R. (1963). Estimation and evaluation. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 429–469). New York: Wiley.
Carver, R. A., &Brown, V. (1997). Effects of amount of attention allocated to the location of visual stimulus pairs on perception of simultaneity.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 534–542.
Creelman, C. D. (1962). Human discrimination of auditory stimuli.Journal of the Acoustical Society,34, 582–593.
Goldstone, S., &Goldfarb, J. L. (1964). Direct comparison of auditory and visual durations.Journal of Experimental Psychology,67, 483–485.
Goodfellow, L. D. (1934). An empirical comparison of audition, vision, and touch in the discrimination of short intervals of time.American Journal of Psychology,46, 243–258.
Grondin, S., &MaCar, F. (1992). Dividing attention between temporal and nontemporal tasks: A performance operating characteristic—POC—analysis. In F. Macar, V. Pouthas, & W. Friedman (Eds.),Time, action and cognition: Towards bridging the gap (pp. 119–128). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hollmann, A. (1985).Zeitwahrnehmung in Abhängigkeit von der retinalen Exzentrizität [The relation between time perception and retinal eccentricity]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich.
Hülser, C. (1924). Zeitauffassung und Zeitschätzung verschieden ausgefüllter Intervalle unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Aufmerksamkeitsablenkung [Time perception and time estimation of filled intervals when attention is distracted].Archiv der gesamten Psychologie,49, 363–378.
Ikeda, M. (1986). Temporal impulse response.Vision Research,26, 1431–1440.
James, W. (1890).The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
Kaernbach, C. (1991). Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 227–229.
Kahneman, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Katz, D. (1906). Experimentelle Beiträge zur Psychologie des Vergleichs im Gebiete des Zeitsinns [Experimental contributions to the psychology of our sense of time].Zeitschrift für Psychologic Physiologie der Sinnesorgane,42, 302–340.
Klein, R. M., Wylie, G., & Briand, K. (1996, October).How does covert visual orienting affect absolute judgments of size and duration? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago.
Loftus, G. R., &Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subjects designs.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 476–490.
Long, G. M., &Beaton, R. J. (1980). The contribution of visual persistence to the perceived duration of brief targets.Perception & Psychophysics,28, 422–430.
Macar, E., Grondin, S., &Casini, L. (1994). Controlled attention sharing influences time estimation.Memory & Cognition,22, 673–686.
Nicholls, M. E. R. (1996). Temporal processing asymmetries between the cerebral hemispheres: Evidence and implications.Laterality,1, 97–137.
Nisly, S. J., &Wasserman, G. S. (1989). Intensity dependence of perceived duration: Data, theories, and neural integration.Psychological Bulletin,106, 483–496.
Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., &Ogden, W. C. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In H. L. Pick, Jr., & I. J. Saltzman (Eds.),Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp. 137–157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Predebon, J. (1996). The relationship between the number of presented stimuli and prospective duration estimates: The effect of concurrent task activity.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 376–379.
Quasebarth, K. (1924). Zeitschätzung und Zeitauffassung optisch und akustisch ausgefüllter Intervalle [Time estimation and time perception of optically and acoustically filled intervals],Archiv der gesamten Psychologic49, 379–432.
Rammsayer, T. (1992).Die Wahrnehmung kurzer Zeitdauern [The perception of short temporal intervals], Münster: Waxmann.
Rammsayer, T. (1996). Experimental evidence for different timing mechanisms underlying temporal discrimination. In S. Masin (Ed.),Fechner Day 96: Twelfth annual meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics (pp. 63–68). Padua: International Society for Psychophysics.
Roufs, J. A. J., &Blommaert, F. J. J. (1981). Temporal impulse and step responses of the human eye obtained psychophysically by means of a drift-correcting perturbation technique.Vision Research,21, 1203–1221.
Shore, D. I., Brehaut, J., &Enns, J. T. (1997). The duration of a brief event in the mind’s eye.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,38, 1798.
Stelmach, L. B., &Herdman, C. M. (1991). Directed attention and perception of temporal order.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 539–550.
Stelmach, L. B., Herdman, C. M, &McNeil, K. R. (1994). Attentional modulation of visual processes in motion perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 108–121.
Thomas, E. A. C., &Cantor, N. E. (1975). On the duality of simultaneous time and size perception.Perception & Psychophysics,18, 44–49.
Thomas, E. A. C., &Cantor, N. E. (1978). Interdependence between the processing of temporal and non-temporal information. In J. Requin (Ed.),Attention and performance VII (pp. 43–62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Thomas, E. A. C., &Weaver, W. B. (1975). Cognitive processing and time perception.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 363–367.
Treisman, M. (1963). Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: Implications for a model of the “internal clock”.Psychological Monographs,77, 1–31.
Tse, P., Intriligator, J., Cavanagh, P., &Rivest, J. (1997). Attention distorts the perception of time.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,38, 5379.
Underwood, G., &Swain, R. A. (1973). Selectivity of attention and the perception of duration.Perception,2, 101–105.
Zakay, D. (1993). Time estimation methods: Do they influence prospective duration estimates?Perception,22, 91–101.
Zakay, D., &Tsal, Y. (1989). Awareness of attention allocation and time estimation accuracy.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,21, 209–210.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mattes, S., Ulrich, R. Directed attention prolongs the perceived duration of a brief stimulus. Perception & Psychophysics 60, 1305–1317 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207993
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207993