Abstract
Response time can be delayed if a target stimulus appears at a location or object that was previously cued. This inhibition of return (IOR) phenomenon has been attributed to a delay in activating attentional or motor processes to a previously cued stimulus. Two experiments required subjects to localize or identify a target stimulus. In Experiment 1, the subjects’ eyes were not monitored. In Experiment 2, the subjects’ eyes were monitored, and the subjects were instructed to either execute or withhold an eye movement to a target stimulus. The results indicated that IOR was always present for location and identification responses, supporting an attentional account of IOR. However, IOR was larger when eye movements were executed, indicating that a motor component can contribute to IOR. Finally, when eye movements were withheld, IOR was larger when a target was presented alone than when it was presented with a distractor, suggesting that IOR is larger for exogenous than for endogenous covert orienting. Together, the data indicate that IOR is composed of both an oculomotor component and an attentional component.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, R. A., &Dobkin, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cueing on eye movement latencies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 467–477.
Briand, K. A., &Klein, R. M. (1987). Is Posner’s “beam” the same as Treisman’s “glue”? On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 228–241.
Cheal, M. L., &Lyon, D. R. (1991). Central and peripheral cuing of forced-choice discrimination.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43A, 859–880.
Corbetta, M., Miezin, E., Shulman, G. L., &Petersen, S. E. (1993). A PET study of visuospatial attention.Journal of Neuroscience,13, 1202–1226.
Gibson, B. S., &Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition and disinhibition of return: Evidence from temporal order judgments.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 669–680.
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In J. [B.] Long & A. [D.] Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kingstone, A., Grabowecky, M., Mangun, G. R., Valsangkar, M., &Gazzaniga, M. S. (1997). Paying attention to the brain: The study of selective visual attention in cognitive neuroscience. In J. Burak & J. Enns (Eds.),Attention, development, andpsychopathology (pp. 263–287). New York: Guilford.
Klein, R. M., Kingstone, A., &Pontefract, A. (1993). Orienting of visual attention. In K. Rayner (Ed.),Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 46–65). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Klein, R. M., Schmidt, W. C., &Müller, H. J. (1998). Disinhibition of return: Unnecessary and unlikely.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 862–872.
Klein, R. M., &Taylor, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113–150). New York: Academic Press.
Maylor, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 189–204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Müller, H. J., &Findlay, J. M. (1988). The effect of visual attention on peripheral discrimination thresholds in single and multiple element displays.Acta Psychologica,69, 129–155.
Müller, H. J., &Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 315–330.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. P. C. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., &Peterson, S. (1990). The attention system of the human brain.Annual Reviews of Neuroscience,13, 25–42.
Pratt, J., & Abrams, R. A. (1997, November).Retinal coding of inhibited eye movements to previously attended location. Poster presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia.
Pratt, J., Kingstone, A., &Khoe, W. (1997). Inhibition of return in location- and identity-based choice decision tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 964–971.
Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P. A., Brennan, C. W., &Sciolto, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 673–685.
Rafal, R. [D.], &Henik, A. (1994). The neurology of inhibition: Integrating controlled and automatic processes. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory processes in attention, memory and language (pp. 1–51). New York: Academic Press.
Schmidt, W. C. (1996). Inhibition of return is not detected using illusory line motion.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 883–898.
Tsal, Y. (1989). Further comments on feature integration: A reply to Briand and Klein.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 407–410.
Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 45–76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 121–134.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by grants to A.K. from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (0134) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (173218 and 170077) and by grants to J.P. from NSERC ( 194537).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kingstone, A., Pratt, J. Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes. Perception & Psychophysics 61, 1046–1054 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207612
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207612