Abstract
The tau effect, an effect of temporal intervals on the perception of spatial separation or sensory difference, has been observed in various sense modalities, including pitch bisection judgments in audition. However, systematic studies on the mechanism of the auditory tau effect have been rather scarce. In the present study, experiments were carried out using the AXB method to investigate the auditory tau effect on the pitch perception of pure tones (Experiment 1), the auditory tau effect on perception of the /e/-/i/, /iA/e/, /I/-/i/, and IM-lll continua (Experiment 2), and the kappa effect—an effect of sensory differences on the perception of temporal intervals—on the perception of pure tones and synthetic vowels (Experiment 3). The results demonstrated that the auditory tau effect occurs not only in the pitch perception of pure tones, but also in the phonetic perception of the fU-iil and /iA/I/ continua of synthetic vowels. The reverse pattern of results was obtained in the /e/-/i/ and /iA/e/ continua. The kappa effect was found both in the pitch perception of pure tones and in phonetic judgments of synthetic vowels. These findings suggest that the interaction between temporal interval and pitch (or phonetic) perception can be explained on the basis of the integration of forward and backward context effects, and that the auditory tau and kappa effects occur at an early stage of auditory information processing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbe, M. (1936). The spatial effect upon the perception of time.Japanese Journal of Experimental Psychology,3, 1–52,
Bill, J. C., &Teft, L. W. (1969) Space-time relations. Effects of time on perceived visual extent.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 196–199.
Christensen, J. P., &Huang, Y. L. (1979). The auditory tau effect and memory for pitch.Perception & Psychophysics,26, 489–494.
Cohen, J., Christensen, J. P., &Ono, A. (1974) Influence of temporal intervals on comparative judgments of pitch: A study of subjective relativity.Tohoku Psychological Folia,33, 76–87.
Cohen, J. Hansel, C. E. M., &Sylvester, J. D. (1953). A new phenomenon in time judgment.Nature,172, 901
Cohen, J., Hansel, C. E. M., &Sylvester, J. D. (1954). Interdependence of temporal auditory judgments.Nature,174, 642.
Crowder, R. G., &Morton, J. (1969). Precategorical acoustic storage (PAS).Perception & Psychophysics,5, 365–373.
Crowder, R G., &Repp, B. H. (1984). Single formant contrast in vowel identification.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 372–378.
Fox.R A. (1985). Within- and between-series contrast in vowel identification Full-vowel versus single-formant anchors.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 223–226.
Fujisaki, H., &Kawashima, T. (1971). A model of the mechanisms for speech perception: Quantitative analysis of categorical effects in discrimination.Annual Report of the Engineering Research Institute, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tokyo,30, 59–68.
Fujisaki, H., Nakamura, N., &Yoshimune, K. (1970). Analysis, normalization and recognition of sustained Japanese vowels.Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan,26, 152–154. (In Japanese with English summary)
Geldreigh, E. W. (1934). A lecture-room demonstration of the visual raw-effect.American Journal of Psychology,46, 483–485
Guilford, J. P. (1954)Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill
Helson, H. (1930) The tau effect—An example of psychological relativity.Science,71, 536–537
Kohler W. (1923). Zur Theorie das Sukzessivvergleichs und der Zeitfehler.Psychologische Forschung,4, 115–175.
Morjkiyo, Y. (1959). Time-order error in the successive comparison of tones: An examination by adaptation-level theory.Japanese Journal of Psychology,30, 46–55. (In Japanese with English summary)
Parducci, A. (1975) Contextual effects: A range-frequency analysis In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds),Handbook of perception (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press
Parks, T. E. (1968). The spatial separation of two light-flashes and their perceived separation in time.American Journal of Psychology,81, 92–98.
Pisoni, D. B. (1975). Auditory short-term memory and vowel perception.Memory & Cognition,3, 7–18.
Postman, L. (1946). The time-error in auditory perception.American Journal of Psychology,56, 193–219.
Price-Williams, D. R. (1954). The kappa-effect.Nature,173, 363–364.
Repp, B. H. (1978). Perceptual integration and differentiation of spectral cues for intervocalic stop consonants.Perception & Psychophysics,24, 471–485.
Repp, B. H., Healy, A. F., &Crowder, R. G. (1979). Categories and contexts in the perception of isolated steady-state vowels.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 129–145.
Sawusch, J. R., &Nusbaum, H. C. (1979). Contextual effects in vowel perception I: Anchor-induced contrast effects.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 292–302.
Sawusch, J. R., Nusbaum, H. C, &Schwab, E. C. (1980). Contextual effects in vowel perception II: Evidence for two processing mechanisms.Perception & Psychophysics,27, 421–434.
Shigeno, S., &Fujisaki, H. (1979). Effect of a preceding anchor upon the categorical judgment of speech and nonspeech stimuli.Japanese Psychological Research,21, 165–173.
Shigeno, S., &Fujisaki, H. (1980). A comparison of forward versus backward context effect in phonetic and non-phonetic judgments on synthetic vowels.Japanese Journal of Psychology,51, 287–290. (In Japanese with English summary)
Simon, H. J., &Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1978). Selective anchoring and adaptation of phonetic and nonphonetic continua.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,64, 1338–1357.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research, Ministry of Education, Science and Culture (No. 60710083), 1985.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shigeno, S. The auditory tau and kappa effects for speech and nonspeech stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics 40, 9–19 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207588
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207588