Abstract
A double response paradigm is utilized to study stimulus intensity effects upon the motor system in simple visual and auditory reaction times (RT). Subjects had to respond with both hands simultaneously upon detection of a stimulus. The RT difference of both hands is thereby of special interest, because it is considered that this variable does not contain any sensory latency and therefore allows one to study those processes that follow stimulus detection. It was found that the RT-difference distribution varies with stimulus intensity, which questions the general view that stimulus intensity affects only very early sensory stages in the processing chain. In particular, it was found that the variance of RT difference diminished with increasing stimulus intensity. This finding supports the notion of speeding up the motor process by increasing stimulus intensity. A generalization of a stochastic model by Meijers and Eijkman (1974) and Meijers, Teulings, and Eijkman (1976) is advanced to account for the findings. The central assumption is that more units (e.g., motoneurons) are activated if stimulus intensity is increased. The model’s qualitative predictions are confirmed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alechsieff, N. (1900). Reactionszeiten bei Durchgangsbeobachtungen.Philosophische Studien,16, 1–60.
Bartlett, N. R., &White, C. T. (1965). Synchronization error in attempts to move the hands simultaneously.Perception and Motor Skills,20, 933–937.
Botwinick, J., &Thompson, L. W. (1966). Premotor and motor components of reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology,71, 9–15.
Burbeck, S. L., &Luce, R. D. (1982). Evidence from auditory simple reaction times for both change and level detectors.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 117–133.
Denier van der Gon, J. J., &Thuring, J. Ph. (1965). The guiding of human writing movements.Kybernetik,2, 145–148.
Elliott, R. (1968). Simple visual and simple auditory reaction time: A comparison.Psychonomic Science,10, 335–336.
Evarts, E. V. (1966). Pyramidal tract activity associated with a conditioned hand movement in the monkey.Journal of Neurophysiology,29, 1011–1027.
Exner, S. (1875). Experimentelle Untersuchungen der einfachsten psychischen Prozesse—III.Pflügers Archiv fir die gesamte Physiologie,11, 403–589.
Fröhlich, F. W. (1929).Die Empfindungszeit. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
Gibbon, J., &Rutschmann, R. (1969). Temporal order judgement and reaction time.Science,165, 413–415.
Gilson, A. S., &Mills, W. B. (1941). Activities of single motor units in man during slight voluntary efforts.American Journal of Physiology,133, 658–669.
Goldstone, S. (1968). Reaction time to onset and termination of lights and sounds.Perceptual & Motor Skills,27, 1023–1029.
Grice, G. R. (1968). Stimulus intensity and response evocation.Psychological Review,75, 359–373.
Hazelhoff, F. F., &Wiersma, H. (1925a). Die Wahrnehmungszeit. 1. Artikel- Die Bestimmung der Schnelligkeit des Wahrnehmens von Lichtreizen nach der Lokalisationsmethode.Zeitschrift für Psychologie,96, 171–188.
Hazelhoff, F. F., &Wiersma, H. (1925b), Die Wahrnehmungszeit. 2. Artikel.Zeitschrift für Psychologie,97, 174–190.
Hazelhoff, F. F., &Wiersma, H. (1926). Die Wahrnehmungszeit. 3. Artikel.Zeitschrift für Psychologie,98, 366–377.
Hildreth, J. D. (1979). Block’s law and a poisson counting model for simple reaction time to light.Perception & Psychophysics,26, 153–162.
Kendall, M. G., &Stuart, A. (1969).The advanced theory of statistics (Vol. 1, 3rd ed.). New York: Hafner.
Kohfeld, D. L. (1971). Simple reaction time as a function of stimulus intensity in decibels of light and sound.Journal of Experimental Psychology,88, 251–257.Kohfeld, D. L. (1982).Reaction-time scales of auditory intensity. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Kohfeld, D. L., Santee, J. L., &Wallace, N. D. (1981). Loudness and reaction time: II. Identification of detection components at different intensities and frequencies.Perception & Psychophysics,29, 550–562.
Kornblum, S. (1973). Simple reaction times as a race between signal detection and time estimation: A paradigm and model.Perception & Psychophysics,13, 108–112.
Levick, W. R. (1973). Variation in the response latency of cat retinal ganglion cells.Vision Research,13, 837–853.
Luce, R D., &Green, D. M. (1972). A neural timing theory for response times and the psychophysics of intensity.Psychological Review,79, 14–57.
McGill, W. J. (1963). Stochastic latency mechanisms. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley.
Meijers, L. M. M., &Eijkman, E. G. J. (1974). The motor system in simple reaction time experiments.Acta Psychologica,38, 367–377.
Meijers, L. M. M., &Eijkman, E. G. J. (1977). Distributions of simple RT with single and double stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 41–48
Meijers, L. M. M., Teulings, J. L. H. M., &Eijkman, E. G. J. (1976) Model of the electromyographic activity during brief isometric contractions.Biological Cybernetics,25, 7–16.
Milner-Brown, H. S., Stein, R. B., &Yemm, R. (1973). The contractile properties of human motor units during voluntary isometric contractions.Journal of Physiology (London),228, 285–306.
Nakamura, R., &Saito, H. (1974). Preferred hand and reaction time in different movement patterns.Perceptual and Motor Skills,39, 1275–1281
Nakamura, R., Taniguchi, R., &Oshima, Y. (1975). Synchronization error in bilateral simultaneous flexion of elbows.Perceptual and Motor Skills,40, 527–532.
Nissen, M. J. (1977). Stimulus intensity and information processing.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 338–352.
Posner, M.I. (1975) Psychobiology of attention In M. Gazzaniga & C. Blakemore (Eds.),Handbook of psychobiology. New York: Academic Press.
Roufs, J. A. J. (1974). Dynamic properties of vision—V: Perception lag and reaction time in relation to flicker and flash thresholds.Vision Research,14, 853–869.
Shiavi, R., &Negin, M. (1975). Multivariate analysis of simultaneously active motor units in human skeletal muscle.Biological Cynbernetics,20, 9–16,
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.),Attention and performance II. Acta Psychologica,30, 276–315.
Todd, J. W. (1912). Reaction to multiple stimuli.Archives of Psychology, Whole No. 25. (Monograph)
Vaughan, H. G., Costa, L. D., &Gilden, L. (1966). The functional relation of visual evoked response and reaction time to sitmulus intensity.Vision Research,6, 645–656.
Vogelsang, K. (1925). Über die Beziehung von Empfindungszeit und Reaktionszeit im Gebiete des Gesichtssinnes.Pflügers Archiv far die gesamte Physiologie,208, 93–109.
Vorberg, D., &Hambuch, R. (1977). On the temporal control of rhythmic performance. In Requin, J. (Ed.),Attention and Performance VII. New York: Academic Press.
Wing, A. M., &Kristofferson, A. B. (1973). Response delays and the timing of discrete motor responses.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 5–12.
Wood, G. A. (1977). An electrophysiological model of human visual reaction time.Journal of Motor Behavior,9, 267–274.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Some results presented here were reported at the 23. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Trier, 1982.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ulrich, R., Stapf, K.H. A double-response paradigm to study stimulus intensity effects upon the motor system in simple reaction time experiments. Perception & Psychophysics 36, 545–558 (1984). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207515
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207515