Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A theory of phenomenal geometry and its applications

  • Published:
Perception & Psychophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The geometry of perceived space (phenomenal geometry) is specified in terms of three basic factors: the perception of direction, the perception of distance or depth, and the perception of the observer’s own position or motion. The apparent spatial locations of stimulus points resulting from these three factors thereupon determine the derived perceptions of size, orientation, shape, and motion. Phenomenal geometry is expected to apply to both veridical and illusory perceptions. It is applied here to explain a number of representative illusions, including the illusory rotation of an inverted mask (Gregory, 1970), a trapezoidal window (Ames, 1952), and any single or multiple point stimuli in which errors in one or more of the three basic factors are present. It is concluded from phenomenal geometry that the size-distance and motion-distance invariance hypotheses are special cases of the head motion paradigm, and that proposed explanations in terms of compensation, expectation, or logical processes often are unnecessary for predicting responses to single or multiple stimuli involving head or stimulus motion. Two hypotheses are identified in applying phenomenal geometry. It is assumed that the perceptual localization of stimulus points determines the same derived perceptions, regardless of the source of perceptual information supporting the localizations. This assumption of cue equivalence or cue substitution provides considerable parsimony to the geometry. Also, it is assumed that the perceptions specified by the geometry are internally consistent. Departures from this internal consistency, such as those which occur in the size-distance paradox, are considered to often reflect the intrusion of nonperceptual (cognitive) processes into the responses. Some theoretical implications of this analysis of phenomenal geometry are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, A., JR (1952) The rotating trapezoid (Cont) Explanation of visual phenomena In F. P. Kilpatrick (Ed.),Human behavior from the transactional point of view (pp. 75–86). Washington, DC: Office of Naval Research, Department of the Navy.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Biersdorf, W. R. (1966) Convergence and apparent distance as correlates of size judgments at near distances.Journal of General Psychology,75, 249–262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E. G. (1946) The perception of objects.American Journal of Physics,14, 99–107

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, J. E. (1988) Affine distortions of pictorial space Some predictions for Goldstein (1987) that La Gournerie (1859) might have made.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,14, 305–311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. (1968) Size information as a factor in visual judgments of absolute distance under reduced conditions Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, R. H., &Parks, T. E. (1989) To exorcize a ghost from the perceptual machine. In M. Hershenson (Ed),The moon illusion (pp 343–350) Hillsdale, NJ. Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Deregowski, J. B. (1980)Illusions, patterns, and pictures. A cross-cultural perspective. New York. Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, F. S. (1975) Kinetic art On my psychokinematic objects.Leonardo8, 97–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, S. R., Smith, S., &McGreevy, M. W. (1987). Distortions of perceived visual directions out of pictures.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 535–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, W., &Babler, T. (1989) Perception of slant-in-depth is automatic.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 31–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, W., Broota, K. D. (1986) Automatic and attentional components in perception of size-at-a-distance.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 256–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, W., &Landauer, A. A. (1969) Size and distance judgments under reduced conditions of viewing.Perception & Psychophysics,6, 269–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, W., &Loviits, B. E. (1985) Automatic and attentional components in perception of shape-at-a-slant.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,11, 335–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, J. M. (1965). Visual space: A scale of perceived visual direction.Proceedings of the 73rd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association,1, 49–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, J. M. (1968) Depth, size and distance in stereoscopic vision.Perception & Psychophysics,3, 265–274

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, J. M. (1972) The size-distance relation and intrinsic geometry of visual space: Implications for processing.Vision Research,12, 323–332.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1950)The perception of the visual worm Boston. Houghton Mifflin

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1966).The senses considered as perceptual systems Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillam, B. J. (1968), Perception of slant when perspective and stereopsis conflict: Experiments with amseikonic lenses.Journal of Experimental Psychology,78, 299–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C. (1954). Perception of the relative position of objects as a function of other objects In the field.Journal of Experimental Psychology,47, 335–342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C. (1965) Equidistance tendency and its consequences.Psychological Bulletin,64, 153–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C. (1969a). The effect of object familiarity on the perception of size and distance.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,21, 239–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C. (1969b) The sensing of retinal size.Vision Research,9, 1079–1094

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C. (1970). The adjacency principle and three dimensional visual illusions. In J C Baird (Ed), Human space perception: Proceedings of the Dartmouth Conference.Psychonomic Monograph Supplement,3(13, Whole No 45), 153–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C. (1971). A validity of the size-distance invariance hypothesis with cue reduction.Perception & Psychophysics,9, 92–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C. (1976) An indirect method of measuring perceived distance fiom familiar size.Perception & Psychophysics,20, 419–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C. (1977) An indirect measure of perceived distance from oculomotor cues.Perception & Psychophysics,21, 3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C. (1979a) The common occurrence of errors of perceived Distance.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 2–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C. (1979b) Induced motion as a function of the speed of the inducing objects, measured by means of two methods.Perception,8, 255–262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C. (1980) The sensing of retinal motion.Perception & Psychophysics,28, 155–163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C. (1981a) Perceived depth is a necessary factor in apparent motion concomitant with head motion A reply to Shebilske and Proffitt.Perception & Psychophysics,29, 173–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C. (1981b) The role of suggested size In distance responsesPerception & Psychophysics,30, 149–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C. (1982). Analysis of the perception of motion concomitant with a lateral motion of the head.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 241–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C. (1983) An illusory motion of a stationary target during head motion is unaffected by paradoxical retinal motion. A reply to Shebilske and Proffitt (1983).Perception & Psychophysics,34, 482–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C. (1984) The role of perceptual interrelations in figural synthesis. In P. Dodwell & T. Caelh (Eds),Figural synthesis (pp 31–82) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C., &Dasilva, J A. (1987a) Familiar size and the theory of off-sized perceptions.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 318–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C., &Dasilva, J A (1987b) A two-process theory of the response to size and distance.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 220–238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C., & Eby, D. W. (1990)The perception of visual angle in optical change. Unpublished manuscript

  • Gogel, W. C., &Harkeb, G. S. (1955) The effectiveness of size cues to relative distance as a function of lateral visual separation.Journal of Experimental Psychology,50, 309–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C., Loomis, J. M., Newman, N. J., &Sharkey, T. J. (1985) Agreement between indirect measures of perceived distance.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 17–27,

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C., &Mershon, D. H. (1977) Local autonomy in visual space Scandinavian.Journal of Psychology,18, 237–250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C., &Newton, R. E. (1969) Perception of off-sized objects.Perception & Psychophysics,5, 7–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C., &Sharkey, T. J. (1989) Measuring attention using induced motion.Perception,18, 303–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C., &Sturm, R. D. (1971) Directional separation and the size cue to distance.Psychologische Forschung,35, 57–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C., &Tietz, J. D. (1973) Absolute motion parallax and the specific distance tendency.Perception & Psychophysica,13, 284–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C., &Tietz, J. D. (1974). The effect of perceived distance on perceived movement.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 70–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C., &Tietz, J. D. (1977) Eye fixation and attention as modifiers of perceived distance.Perceptual & Motor Skills,45, 343–362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C., &Tietz, J. D. (1979). A comparison of oculomotor and motion parallax cues of egocentric distance.Vision Research,19, 1161–1170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gogel, W. C., & Tietz, J. D. (1990)Limitations of the role of cognitive factors in the perception of orientation in depth. Unpublished manuscript

  • Goldstein, E. B. (1979). Rotation of objects in pictures viewed at an angle: Evidence for different properties of two types of pictorial spaceJournal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,8, 78–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, E. B (1987). Spatial layout, orientation relative to the observer, and perceived projection in pictures viewed at an angle.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 256–266.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, E. B. (1988) Geometry or not geometry? Perceived orientation and spatial layout in pictures viewed at an angle.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 312–314

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R. L (1968, November).Visual illusions. Scientific American, pp. 66–76.

  • Gregory, R. L. (1970).The intelligent eye. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, J. C. (1968). Visual adaptation to an altered correlation between eye movement and hand movement.Science,160, 429–430.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, J. C., &Goldsmith, W. M. (1973). Space-time adaptation of visual position constancy.Journal of Experimental Psychology,99, 1–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann, E. G., Tulving, E., &Nachmias, J (1959). The effect of oculomotor adjustments on apparent size.American Journal of Psychology,72, 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holway, A. H., &Boring, E. G. (1941) Determinants of apparent visual size with distance variant.American Journal of Psychology,54, 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ittelson, W. H. (1952).The Ames demonstrations in perception (pp. 21–25). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komoda, M. K., &Ono, H. (1974). Oculomotor adjustments and size distance perception.Perception & Psychophysics,15, 353–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landauer, A. A., &Epstein, W. (1969). Does retinal size have a unique correlate in perceived size?.Perception & Psychophysics,6, 273–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz, H. W. (1971). Sensory, learned, and cognitive mechanisms of size perception.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,188, 47–62.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leubowitz, H., &Moore, D. (1966) Role of changesen accommodation and convergence in the perception of size.Journal of the Optical Society of America,56, 1120–1123.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz, H. W., Shiina, K., &Hennessy, R. T. (1972). Oculomotor adjustments and size constancy.Perception & Psychophysics,12, 497–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack, A. (1978). Three modes of visual perception. In H. L Pick, Jr., & E. Saltzman (Eds.).Modes of percerving and processing information (pp. 171–186). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCready, D. W., Jr. (1965). Size-distance perception and accommodation-convergence micropsia: A critique.Vision Research,5, 189–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCready, D. (1985). On size, distance, and visual angle perceptionPerception & Psychophysics,37, 323–334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCready, D. (1986). Moon illusions redescribed.Perception & Psychophysics,39, 64–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacCracken, P. J., Gogel, W. C., &Blum, G. S (1980). Effects of posthypnotic suggestion on perceived egocentric distance.Perception,9, 561–568.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ono, H., Muter, P., &Mitson, L. (1974). Size-distance paradox with accommodative micropsia.Perception & Psychophysics,15, 301–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. A., &Shyi, G. C.-W. (1988). The detection of real and apparent concomitant rotation in a three-dimensional cube: Implications for perceptual interactions.Perception & Psychophysics,44, 31–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Post, R. B., &Leibowitz, H. W. (1982). The effect of convergence on the vestibulo-ocular reflex and implications for perceived movement.Vision Research,22, 461–465.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rock, I. (1977). In defense of unconscious inference. In W. Epstein (Ed.),Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes (pp. 321–373). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, I. (1983).The logic of perception Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, I., Hill, A. L., &Fineman, M. (1968). Speed constancy as a function of size constancy.Perception & Psychophysics,4, 37–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rock, I., &McDermott, W. (1964) The perception of visual angleActa Psychologica,22, 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roelops, C. O. (1935) Optische Lokalisation.Archiv für Augenheilkunde,109, 395–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriver, W. (1925). Experimentelle Studien über stereoskopisches Sehen.Zeitschrift für Psychologie,96, 113–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherilske, W. L., Proffitt, D. R. (1981). The priority of perceived distance for perceiving motion has not been demonstrated: Critical comments on Gogel’s “The sensing of retinal motion”.Perception & Psychophysics,29, 170–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherilske, W. L., &Proffitt, D. R. (1983) Paradoxical retinal motions during head movements. Apparent motion without equivalent apparent displacement.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 476–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanston, M. T., &Gogel, W. C. (1986). Perceived size and motion in depth from optical expansion.Perception & Psychophysics,39, 309–326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tietz, J. D., &Gogel, W. C. (1978). Adaptation to apparent concomitant motion in the absence of physical or retinal motion.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,12, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Des Meer, H. C. (1979). Interrelation of the effects of binocular disparity and perspective cues on judgments of depth and height.Perception & Psychophysics,26, 481–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Holst, E., &Mittelstaedt, H. (1950). Das Reafferenz-Prinzip.Die Naturwissenschaften,20, 464–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, H. (1985, May). Perceiving a stable environment.Scientific American, pp. 118–124

  • Wallach, H. (1987). Perceiving a stable environment when one moves.Annual Review of Psychology,38, 1–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, H., Bacon, J., &Schulman, P. (1978). Adaptation in motion perception: Alteration of induced motion.Perception & Psychophysics,24, 509–514.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, H., &Floor, L. (1970). On the relation of adaptation to field displacement during head movements to the constancy of visual direction.Perception & Psychophysics,8, 95–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, H., &Frey, K. J. (1969). Adaptation in the constancy of visual direction measured by a one-trial method.Perception & Psychophysics,5, 249–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wist, E. R., Diener, H. C., &Dichgans, J. (1976). Motion constancy dependent upon perceived distance and the spatial frequency of the stimulus pattern.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 485–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wist, E. R., Diener, H. C., Dichgans, J., &Brandt, Th. (1975) Perceived distance and the perceived speed of self-motion: Linear vs. angular velocity?.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 549–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wist, E. R., Summons, E. (1976). Spatial and fixation conditions affecting the temporal course of changes in perceived relative distance.Psychological Research,39, 99–112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of California, 93106, Santa Barbara, CA, USA

    Walter C. Gogel

Authors
  1. Walter C. Gogel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The preparation of this article was supported by Research Grant MH 39457 from the United States National Institute of Mental Health.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gogel, W.C. A theory of phenomenal geometry and its applications. Perception & Psychophysics 48, 105–123 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207077

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207077

Keywords

Search

Navigation