Abstract
In an earlier paper (Maljkovic & Nakayama, 1994) we showed that repetition of an attention-driving feature primes the deployment of attention to the same feature on subsequent trials. Here we show that repetition of the targetposition also primes subsequent trials. Position priming shows a characteristic spatial pattern. Facilitation occurs when the target position is repeated on subsequent trials, and inhibition occurs when the target falls on a position previously occupied by a distractor. Facilitation and inhibition also exist, though somewhat diminished, for positions adjacent to those of the target and distractors. Assessing the effect of a single trial over time, we show that the characteristic memory trace exerts its strongest influence on immediately following trials and decays gradually over the succeeding, approximately five to eight, trials. Throughout this period, target-position facilitation is always stronger than distractor-position inhibition. The characteristics of position priming are also seen under conditions in which the attention-driving feature either stays the same or differs from the previous trial, suggesting that feature and position priming operate independently. In a separate experiment, using the fact that position priming is cumulative over trials, we show that position priming is largely object- or landmark-centered.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen, R. A. (1987). Inferior parietal lobule function in spatial perception and visuomotor integration. In F. Plum & V. B. Mountcastle (Eds.),Handbook of physiology: Vol. 5. The nervous system (pp. 483–518). Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society.
Andersen, R. A., &Zipser, D. (1988). The role of posterior parietal cortex in coordinate transformations for visual-motor integration.Canadian Journal of Physiology & Pharmacology,66, 488–501.
Baddeley, A. (1986).Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bajcsy, R. (1988). Active perception.Proceedings of the IEEE,76, 996–1005.
Ballard, D. H. (1989). Behavioral constraints on animate vision.Image & Vision Computing,7, 3–9.
Bravo, M. J., &Nakayama, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 465–472.
Goodale, M. M., Milner, A. D., Jakobson, L. S., &Carey, D. P. (1991). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them.Nature,349, 154–156.
Kowler, E., Martins, A. J., &Pavel, M. (1984). The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control-IV. Anticipatory smooth eye movements depend on prior target movements.Vision Research,24, 197–210.
Kröse, B. J. A., &Julesz, B. (1989). The control and speed of shifts of attention.Vision Research,29, 1607–1619.
Kwak, H.-W., &Egeth, H. (1992). Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 455–464.
Maljkovic, V., Bravo, M., &Nakayama, K. (1992). Characteristics of short-term visual memory which passively influence the guidance of focal attention.Perception,21 (Suppl. 2), 68.
Maljkovic, V., &Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features.Memory & Cognition,22, 657–672.
Maylor, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 189–207). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Maylor, E. A., &Hockey, R. J. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 777–787.
McPeek, R. M., &Nakayama, K. (1995). Linkage of attention and saccades in a visual search task.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,36(4), S354.
Menzel, R. (1987). Memory traces in honeybees. In R. Menzel & A. Mercer (Eds.),Neurobiology and behavior of honeybees (pp. 310–325). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Miller, E. K., Li, L., &Desimone, R. (1991). A neural mechanism for working recognition memory in inferior temporal cortex.Science,254, 1377–1379.
Miller, J. (1988). Components of location probability effect in visual search tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 453–471.
Nakayama, K., &Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention.Vision Research,29, 1631–1647.
Neill, W. T., Terry, K. M., &Valdes, L. A. (1994). Negative priming without probe selection.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 119–121.
Park, J., &Kanwisher, N. (1994). Negative priming for spatial locations: Identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 613–623.
Posner, M. I., Cohen, Y., Choate, L. S., Hockey, R., &Maylor, E. (1984). Sustained concentration: Passive filtering or active orienting? In S. Kornblum & J. Requin (Eds.),Preparatory states and processes (pp. 49–65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Reid, P. J., &Shettleworth, S. J. (1992). Detection of cryptic prey: Search image or search rate?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,18, 273–286.
Rovamo, J., &Virsu, V. (1979). Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor.Experimental Brain Research,37, 475–494.
Schacter, D. L., Chiu, C.-Y. P., &Ochsner, K. N. (1993). Implicit memory: A selective review.Annual Review of Neuroscience,16, 159–182.
Shapiro, K. L., &Loughlin, C. (1993). The locus of inhibition in the priming of static objects: Object token versus location.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 352–363.
Shaw, M. L. (1984). Division of attention among spatial locations: A fundamental difference between detection of letters and detection of luminance increments. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bowhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X (pp. 109–121). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Skavenski, A. A., McPeek, R. M., Maljkovic, V., &Nakayama, K. (1993). Two forms of shortened saccadic eye movement latency in a pop-out visual search task.Society for Neuroscience Abstracts,19, 426.
Snyder, C. R. R. (1972). Selection, inspection, and naming in visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology,92, 428–431.
Sutter, E. (1992). A deterministic approach to nonlinear systems analysis. In R. B. Pinter & B. Nabet (Eds.),Nonlinear vision: Determination of neural receptive fields, function, and networks (pp. 171–197). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Tanaka, Y., &Shimojo, S. (1993). Location priming and probability priming are isolatable in detection and discrimination.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,33 (Suppl.), 1234.
Tipper, S. P., Brehaut, J. C., &Driver, J. (1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 492–504.
Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., &Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centered inhibition of return of visual attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology,43A, 289–298.
Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Cameron, S., Brehaut, J. C., &Bastedo, J. (1991). Inhibitory mechanisms of attention in identification and localization tasks: Time course and disruption.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 681–692.
Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 201–237.
Treisman, A., Vieira, A., &Hayes, A. (1992). Automaticity and preattentive processing.American Journal of Psychology,105, 341–362.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., &Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 419–433.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by AFOSR Grant F49620-92-J-0016 to K.N.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maljkovic, V., Nakayama, K. Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position. Perception & Psychophysics 58, 977–991 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206826
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206826