Abstract
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin Weber’s law applied to interval timing is called thescalar property. A hallmark of timing in the secondsto-minutes range, the scalar property is characterized by proportionality between the standard deviation of a response distribution and the duration being timed. In this temporal reproduction study, we assessed whether the scalar property was upheld when participants chronometrically counted three visually presented durations (8, 16, and 24 sec) as compared with explicitly timing durations without counting. Accuracy for timing and accuracy for counting were similar. However, whereas timing variability showed the scalar property, counting variability did not. Counting variability across intervals was accurately modeled by summing a random variable representing an individual count. A second experiment replicated the first and demonstrated that task differences were not due to presentation order or practice effects. The distinct psychophysical properties of counting and timing behaviors argue for greater attention to participant strategies in timing studies.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bovens, N., &Brysbaert, M. (1990). IBM PC/XT/AT and PS/2 Turbo Pascal timing with extended resolution.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,22, 332–334.
Catania, A. C. (1970). Reinforcement schedules and psychophysical judgements: A study of some temporal properties of behavior. In W. N. Schoenfeld (Ed.), The theory of reinforcement schedules (pp. 1–42). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Church, R. M., Getty, D. J., &Lerner, N. D. (1976). Duration discrimination by rats.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,2, 303–312.
Cordes, S., Gelman, R., Gallistel, C. R., &Whalen, J. (2001). Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 698–707.
Crystal, J. D. (2001). Circadian time perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,27, 68–78.
Fetterman, J. G., &Killeen, P. R. (1990). A componential analysis of pacemaker-counter timing systems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 766–780.
Gallistel, C. R., &Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation.Cognition,44, 43–74.
Getty, D. J. (1976). Counting processes in human timing.Perception & Psychophysics,20, 191–197.
Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber’s law in animal timing.Psychological Review,84, 279–325.
Gibbon, J., &Church, R. M. (1984). Sources of variance in informationprocessing theories of timing. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.),Animal cognition (pp. 465–488). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gibbon, J., Church, R. M., &Meck, W. H. (1984). Scalar timing in memory. In J. Gibbon & L. Allan (Eds.),Timing and time perception (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 423, pp. 52–77). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Gilliland, A. R., &Martin, R. (1940). Some factors in estimating short time intervals.Journal of Experimental Psychology,27, 243–255.
Graves, R., &Bradley, R. (1987). Millisecond interval timer and auditory reaction time programs for the IBM PC.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,19, 30–35.
Grondin, S. (2001). From physical time to the first and second moments of psychological time.Psychological Bulletin,127, 22–44.
Grondin, S., Meilleur-Wells, G., &Lachance, R. (1999). When to start explicit counting in a time-intervals discrimination task: A critical point in the timing process of humans.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 993–1004.
Ivry, R. B., &Hazeltine, R. E. (1995). Perception and production of temporal intervals across a range of durations: Evidence for a common timing mechanism.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 3–18.
Killeen, P. R. (1991). Counting the minutes. In F. Macar, V. Pouthas, & W. J. Friedman (Eds.),Time, action, & cognition: Towards bridging the gap (pp. 203–214). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Killeen, P. R., &Weiss, N. A. (1987). Optimal timing and the Weber function.Psychological Review,94, 455–468.
Kruup, K. (1961). The influence of method on time judgments.Australian Journal of Psychology,13, 44–54.
Mechner, F. (1958). Probability relations within response sequences under ratio reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,1, 109–122.
Meck, W. H., &Church, R. M. (1983). A mode control model of counting and timing processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,9, 320–334.
Platt, J. R., &Johnson, D. M. (1971). Localization of position within a homogeneous behavior chain: Effects of error contingencies.Learning & Motivation,2, 386–414.
Rakitin, B. C., Gibbon, J., Penney, T. B., Malapani, C., Hinton, S. C., &Meck, W. H. (1998). Scalar expectancy theory and peakinterval timing in humans.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,24, 15–33.
Roberts, S. (1981). Isolation of an internal clock.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,7, 242–268.
Schneider, B. A. (1969). A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,12, 677–687.
Spivack, G., &Levine, M. (1964). Consistency of individual differences in time judgments.Perceptual & Motor Skills,19, 83–92.
Talton, L. E., Higa, J. J., &Staddon, J. E. R. (1999). Interval schedule performance in the goldfish Carassius auratus.Behavioural Processes,45, 193–206.
Wearden, J. H., &McShane, B. (1988). Interval production as an analogue of the peak procedure: Evidence for similarity of human and animal timing processes.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40B, 363–375.
Whalen, J., Gallistel, C. R., &Gelman, R. (1999). Nonverbal counting in humans: The psychophysics of number representation.Psychological Science,10, 130–137.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (P01 MH51358.R01 MH57836) to S.M.R. and MCW’s General Clinical Research Center (M01 RR00058).
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196587.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hinton, S.C., Rao, S.M. “One-thousandone … one-thousandtwo …”: Chronometric counting violates the scalar property in interval timing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11, 24–30 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206456
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206456