Abstract
Does the magical number four characterize our visual working memory (VWM) capacity for all kinds of objects, or is the capacity of VWM inversely related to the perceptual complexity of those objects? To find out how perceptual complexity affects VWM, we used a change detection task to measure VWM capacity for six types of stimuli of different complexity: colors, letters, polygons, squiggles, cubes, and faces. We found that the estimated capacity decreased for more complex stimuli, suggesting that perceptual complexity was an important factor in determining VWM capacity. However, the considerable correlation between perceptual complexity and VWM capacity declined significantly if subjects were allowed to view the sample memory display longer. We conclude that when encoding limitations are minimized, perceptual complexity affects, but does not determine, VWM capacity.
Article PDF
References
Alvarez, G. A., &Cavanagh, P. (2004). The capacity of visual short term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects.Psychological Science,15, 106–111.
Angelone, B. L., Levin, D. T., &Simons, D. J. (2003). The relationship between change detection and recognition of centrally attended objects in motion pictures.Perception,32, 947–962.
Green, C. S., &Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention.Nature,423, 534–537.
Luck, S. J., &Vogel, E. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.Nature,309, 279–281.
Olesen, P. J., Westerberg, H., &Klingberg, T. (2004). Increased prefrontal and parietal activity after training of working memory.Nature Neuroscience,7, 75–79.
Olson, I. R., &Jiang, Y. (2004). Visual short-term memory is not improved by training.Memory & Cognition,32, 1326–1332.
Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection.Perception & Psychophysics,44, 369–378.
Schneider, W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention.Psychological Review,84, 1–66.
Scholl, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art.Cognition,80, 1–46.
Song, J.-H., & Jiang, Y. (in press). Visual working memory for simple and complex features: An fMRI study.NeuroImage.
Spelke, E. S., Gutheil, G., &Van de Walle, G. (1995). The development of object perception. In S. M. Kosslyn & D. N. Osherson (Eds.),Visual cognition: An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 2, pp. 297–330). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., &Luck, S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performanc,27, 92–114.
Wang, Q., Cavanagh, P., &Green, M. (1994). Familiarity and pop-out in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 495–500.
Wheeler, M. E., & Treisman, A. M. (2002). Binding in short-term visual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,131, 48–64.
Zhang, W., &Luck, S. J. (2003). Slot-like versus continuous representations in visual working memory [Abstract].Journal of Vision,3, 681a.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This study was supported by NSF Grant 0345525 and the Harvard College Research Program.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eng, H.Y., Chen, D. & Jiang, Y. Visual working memory for simple and complex visual stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 1127–1133 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206454
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206454