Abstract
Subjects’ ability to override attentional capture by salient distractors during singleton search has been attributed to the adoption of an attentional set for the type of discontinuity characterizing the target (Folk, Remington, & Johnston, 1992) or to fast disengagement of attention from the salient distractor’s location (Theeuwes, Atchley, & Kramer, 2000). The present results support an alternative account by showing that temporal expectancies modulate attentional capture. In a color singleton search, an irrelevant onset preceding the target by a given time interval produced capture when the distractor-to-target interval varied unpredictably but failed to do so when this interval was predictable. Moreover, with unpredictable intervals and moderately salient stimuli, capture was overridden at the expected average interval. These findings invite caution when stimulus onset asynchrony manipulations are used to study the temporal deployment of attention, since they demonstrate that such manipulations introduce powerful temporal expectations.
Article PDF
References
Bacon, W. F., &Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 485–496.
Coull, J. T., Frith, C. D., Büchel, C., &Nobre, A. C. (2000). Orienting attention in time: Behavioral and neuroanatomical distinction between exogenous and endogenous shifts.Neuropsychologia,38, 808–819.
Coull, J. T., &Nobre, A. C. (1998). Where and when to pay attention: The neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI.Journal of Neuroscience,18, 7426–7435.
Folk, C. L., &Remington, R. [W.] (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 847–858.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Wright, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 317–329.
Kim, M.-S., &Cave, K. R. (1999). Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of interference from a salient distractor.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1009–1023.
Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 138–147.
Lamy, D., Carmel, T., Egeth, H. E., & Leber, A. B. (in press). Effects of search mode and intertrial priming on singleton search.Perception & Psychophysics.
Lamy, D., &Egeth, H. E. (2003). Attentional capture in singletondetection and feature-search modes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 1003–1020.
Lamy, D., Leber, A., &Egeth, H. E. (2004). Effects of task relevance and stimulus-driven salience within the feature search mode.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,30, 1019–1031.
Lamy, D., &Tsal, Y. (1999). A salient distractor does not disrupt conjunction search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 93–98.
Milliken, B., Lupiáñez, J., Roberts, M., &Stevanovski, B. (2003). Orienting in space and time: Joint contributions to exogenous spatial cuing effects.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 877–883.
Miniussi, C., Wilding, E. L., Coull, J. T., &Nobre, A. C. (1999). Orienting attention in time: Modulation of brain potentials.Brain,122, 1507–1518.
Niemi, P., &Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time.Psychological Bulletin,89, 133–162.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pratt, J., Sekuler, A. B., &McAuliffe, J. (2001). The role of attentional set on attentional cueing and inhibition of return.Visual Cognition,8, 33–46.
Rauschenberger, R. (2003). Attentional capture by auto- and allocues.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 814–842.
Ruz, M., &Lupiáñez, J. (2002). A review of attentional capture: On its automaticity and sensitivity to endogenous control.Psicológica,23, 283–309.
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 184–193.
Theeuwes, J. (2004). Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 65–70.
Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P., &Kramer, A. F. (2000). On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 105–124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Yantis, S., &Egeth, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 661–676.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 121–134.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Support for this research was provided by the Israel Science Foundation, Grant 1382-04 to D.L.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lamy, D. Temporal expectations modulate attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 1112–1119 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206452
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206452