Abstract
In the present study, we investigated whether faces have an advantage in retaining attention over other stimulus categories. In three experiments, subjects were asked to focus on a central go/no-go signal before classifying a concurrently presented peripheral line target. In Experiment 1, the go/no-go signal could be superimposed on photographs of upright famous faces, matching inverted faces, or meaningful objects. Experiments 2 and 3 tested upright and inverted unfamiliar faces, printed names, and another class of meaningful objects in an identical design. A fourth experiment provided a replication of Experiment 1, but with a 1,000-msec stimulus onset asynchrony between the onset of the central face/nonface stimuli and the peripheral targets. In all the experiments, the presence of an upright face significantly delayed target response times, in comparison with each of the other stimulus categories. These results suggest a general attentional bias, so that it is particularly difficult to disengage processing resources from faces.
Article PDF
References
Amir, N., Elias, J., Klumpp, H., &Przeworski, A. (2003). Attentional bias to threat in social phobia: Facilitated processing of threat or difficulty disengaging attention from threat?Behaviour Research & Therapy,41, 1325–1335.
Bradley, B. P., Mogg, K., Falla, S. J., &Hamilton, L. R. (1998). Attentional bias for threatening facial expressions in anxiety: Manipulation of stimulus duration.Cognition & Emotion,12, 737–753.
Bruce, V., &Young, A. W. (1986). Understanding face recognition.British Journal of Psychology,77, 305–327.
Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., &Hancock, P. J. B. (1999). From pixels to people: A model of familiar face recognition.Cognitive Science,23, 1–31.
Burton, A. M., &Young, A. W. (1999). Simulation and explanation: Some harmony and some discord.Cognitive Neuropsychology,16, 73–79.
De Renzi, E. (2000). Prosopagnosia. In M. J. Farah & T. E. Feinberg (Eds.),Patient-based approaches to cognitive neuroscience (pp. 85–96). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, H. M., &Tanaka, J. R. (1995). The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms.Vision Research,35, 2089–2093.
Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., &Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 681–700.
Jones, B. T., Jones, B. C., Smith, H., &Copley, N. (2003). A flicker paradigm for inducing change blindness reveals alcohol and cannabis information processing biases in social users.Addiction,98, 235–244.
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., &Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception.Journal of Neuroscience,17, 4302–4311.
Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 451–468.
Lavie, N. (2000). Selective attention and cognitive control: Dissociating attentional functions through different types of load. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 175–194). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
Mack, A., Pappas, Z., Silverman, M., &Gay, R. (2002). What we see: Inattention and the capture of attention by meaning.Consciousness & Cognition,11, 488–506.
Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., &Behrmann, M. (1997). What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,9, 555–604.
Palermo, R., &Rhodes, G. (2003). Change detection in the flicker paradigm: Do faces have an advantage?Visual Cognition,10, 683–713.
Ro, T., Russell, C., &Lavie, N. (2001). Changing faces: A detection advantage in the flicker paradigm.Psychological Science,12, 94–99.
Shelley-Tremblay, J., &Mack, A. (1999). Metacontrast masking and attention.Psychological Science,10, 508–515.
Treisman, A. M. (1993). Representing visual objects. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.),Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 163–175). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vuilleumier, P. (2000). Faces call for attention: Evidence from patients with visual extinction.Neuropsychologia,38, 693–700.
Waters, A. J., Shiffman, S., Bradley, B. P., &Mogg, K. (2003). Attentional shifts to smoking cues in smokers.Addiction,98, 1409–1417.
Yiend, J., &Mathews, A. (2001). Anxiety and attention to threatening pictures.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54A, 665–681.
Young, A. W., &Burton, A. M. (1999). Simulating face recognition: Implications for modelling cognition.Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 1–48.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by an ESRC postgraduate studentship (R42200134060) and an EPS Study Visit Grant to M.B.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bindemann, M., Burton, A.M., Hooge, I.T.C. et al. Faces retain attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 1048–1053 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206442
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206442