Abstract
The intention superiority effect (ISE) is characterized by faster response time to task material intended for future performance than to neutral material with no associated intention or material that is linked to a canceled intention. The existence of the ISE has been explored here under naturalistic conditions in which participants self-initiate an intention that is of personal relevance to them. Participants were required to remember prospective tasks that were presented under the guise of preparatory tasks for the next participant. After encoding a pair of tasks, they were informed that one task no longer needed to be performed. Subsequent lexical decision data exhibited the expected effect of faster response time for intended items than for canceled items (experimental groups in Experiments 1A and 1B). No differences in response time were observed between two sets of canceled items (control group in Experiment 1A). When an intention coexisted with the expectation that a written description of the task would be available, no reliable difference in latencies for these items and canceled items was observed (control group in Experiment 1B). The results are discussed in terms of facilitatory and inhibitory processes that may allow us to contend with many intentions in everyday scenarios.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R. (1993).Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cattell, R. B., &Cattell, A. K. S. (1960). Test of “g”: Culture Fair, scale 2, tests 2, 3 & 4. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
Dobbs, A. R., &Reeves, M. B. (1996). Prospective memory: More than memory. In M. A. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.),Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 199–225). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ellis, J. A. (1996). Prospective memory or the realization of delayed intentions: A conceptual framework. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.),Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 1–22). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Francis, W. N., Kucï era, H., &Mackie, A. W. (1982).Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Goschke, T., &Kuhl, J. (1993). Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,5, 1211–1226.
Howell, D. C. (1992).Statistical methods for psychology (3rd ed.). Boston: PWS-Kent.
Klein, S. B., &Kihlstrom, J. F. (1986). Elaboration, organization, and the self-reference effect in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 26–38.
ÏKlein, S. B., Loftus, J., &Burton, H. A. (1989). Two self-reference effects—the importance of distinguishing between self-descriptiveness judgments and autobiographical retrieval in self-referent encoding.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,56, 853–865.
Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognition-behavior consistency: Self-regulatory processes and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.),Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 101–128). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Mäntylä, T. (1993). Priming effects in prospective memory.Memory,1, 203–218.
Mäntylä, T. (1996). Activating actions and interrupting intentions: Mechanisms of retrieval sensitization in prospective memory. In M. A. Brandimonte, G.O. Einstein, & M.A. McDaniel (Eds.),Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 93–113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., &Bink, M. L. (1998). Activation of completed, uncompleted, and partially completed intentions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 350–361.
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., &Bryan, E. S. (1999). The activation of unrelated and canceled intentions.Memory & Cognition,27, 320–327.
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., &Landau, J. D. (1998). An investigation of everyday prospective memory.Memory & Cognition,26, 633–643.
Norman, D. A., &Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davison, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.),Consciousness and self-regulation (pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum.
Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., &Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,35, 677–688.
Schaefer, E. G., Kozak, M. V., &Sagness, K. (1998). The role of enactment in prospective remembering.Memory & Cognition,26, 644–650.
Shallice, T., &Burgess, P. (1991). Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man.Brain,114, 727–741.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by the award of a postgraduate research studentship to the first author from the Economic and Social Research Council: Award R00429834382.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dockree, P.M., Ellis, J.A. Forming and canceling everyday intentions: Implications for prospective remembering. Memory & Cognition 29, 1139–1145 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206383
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206383